Socio-material practices in classrooms that lead to the social participation or social isolation of disabled pupils

References

• Angrosino, M. V. 2005. “Recontextualizing Observation: Ethnography, Pedagogy, and the Prospects of Progressive Political Agendas.” In The Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 729–746. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arthanat, S., S. M. Bauer, J. A. Lenker, S. M. Nochajski, and Y. W. B. Wu. 2007. “Conceptualization and Measurement of Assistive Technology Usability.” Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2 (4): 235–248. doi: 10.1080/17483100701343665
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailey, J. 1998. “Inclusion through Categorisation.” In From Them to Us: An International Study of Inclusion in Education, edited by R. Booth and M. Ainscow, 171–185. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boer, de A., S. J. Pijl, and A. Minnaert. 2011. “Regular Primary Schoolteachers' Attitudes towards Inclusive Education: A Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 15 (3): 331–353. doi: 10.1080/13603110903030089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossaert, G., H. Colpin, S. J. Pijl, and K. Petry. 2013. “Truly Included? A Literature Study Focusing on the Social Dimension of Inclusion in Education.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 17 (1): 60–79. doi:10.1080/13603116.2011.580464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. 2013. “Hidden Contradictions and Conditionality: Conceptualisations of Inclusive Education in International Human Rights Law.” Disability & Society 28 (2): 232–244. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.699282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coster, W., and M. A. Khetani. 2008. “Measuring Participation of Children with Disabilities: Issues and Challenges.” Disability and Rehabilitation 30 (8): 639–648. doi:10.1080/09638280701400375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craddock, G. 2006. “The AT Continuum in Education: Novice to Power User.” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 1 (1–2): 17–27. doi: 10.1080/09638280500167118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobransky, K., and E. Hargittai. 2006. “The Disability Divide in Internet Access and Use.” Information, Communication & Society 9 (3): 313–334. doi:10.1080/13691180600751298.
   Google Scholar
• Education Act. 1997. Om lov om grunnskolen og den videregående opplæringa [About Act on Compulsory Schools and High School]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gable, A. S. 2013. “Disability Theorizing and Real-world Educational Practice: A Framework for Understanding.” Disability & Society 29 (1): 86–100. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.776485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggin, G., and C. Newell. 2006. “Editorial Comment: Disability, Identity, and Interdependence: ICTs and New Social Forms.” Information, Communication & Society 9 (3): 309–311. doi:10.1080/13691180600751272.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., and B. Lundman. 2004. “Qualitative Content Analysis in Nursing Research: Concepts, Procedures and Measures to Achieve Trustworthiness.” Nurse Education Today 24 (2): 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, A., J. Tøssebro, and R. Traustadòttir. 2005. “Introduction: Approaches and Perspectives in Nordic Disability Research.” In Resistance, Reflection and Change Nordic Disability Research, edited by A. Gustavsson, J. Sandvin, R. Traustadòttir, and J. Tøssebro, 23–44. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson, H., H. Lindström, and L. Nygård. 2009. “Use of Assistive Technology Devices in Mainstream Schools: Students' Perspective.” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 63 (4): 463–472. doi: 10.5014/ajot.63.4.463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, I.-C., D. Sugden, and S. Beveridge. 2009. “Children's Perceptions of Their Use of Assistive Devices in Home and School Settings.” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 4 (2): 95–105. doi:10.1080/17483100802613701.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ICF-CY. 2007. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Children & Youth Version: ICF-CY. Geneva: WHO. ISBN 978 92 4 1547321.
   Google Scholar
• Kermit, P., A. M. Tharaldsteen, G. M. D. Haugen, and C. Wendelborg. 2014. En av flokken? Inkludering og ungdom med sansetap – muligheter og begrensninger [One of the Flock? Inclusion and Young People with Sensory Loss – Opportunities and Limitations]. Rapport 2014 Mangfold og inkludering, Trondheim: NTNU Samfunnsforskning AS.
   Google Scholar
• Lalvani, P. 2013. “Privilege, Comprise, or Social Justice: Teachers' Conceptualizations of Inclusive Education.” Disability & Society 28 (1): 14–27. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.692028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2008. En ny sociologi for et nyt samfund Introduktion til Aktør-Netværk-teor.i [A New Sociology for a New Society: Introduction to Actor-network Theory]. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. 2010. “Perceptions of Health Care Workers Prescribing Augmentative and Alternative Communication Devices to Children.” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 5 (3): 209–222. doi: 10.3109/17483101003718195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markussen, E., M. Strømstad, T. C. Carlsten, R. Hausstätter, and T. Nordahl. 2007. “Inkluderende spesialundervisning? [Inclusive Special Education?].” Report No. 19/2007. Oslo: NIFU STEP and the University College of Hedmark.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, I. B. 2003. Road Traffic Accidents: The Ordering of Subjects, Bodies and Disability. Oslo: Unipub AS.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, I. 2006. “Sociotechnical Practices and Differences on the Interference between Disability, Gender, and Class.” Science, Technology and Human Values 31 (5): 537–564. doi:10.1177/0162243906289611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, I. B., and J. Law. 2003. “Making Voices: New Media Technologies, Disabilities, and Articulation.” In Digital Media Revisited: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains, edited by G. Liestøl, A. Morrison, and T. Rasmussen, 491–520. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murchland, S., and H. Parkyn. 2010. “Using Assistive Technology for Schoolwork: The Experience of Children with Physical Disabilities.” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 5 (6): 438–447. doi:10.3109/17483107.2010.481773.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate of Health. 2008. Universal Design in Public Sector. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Østensjø, S., E. B. Carlberg, and N. K. Vøllestad. 2005. “The Use and Impact of Assistive Devices and Other Environmental Modifications on Everyday Activities and Care in Young Children with Cerebal Palsy.” Disability and Rehabilitation 27 (14): 849–861. doi: 10.1080/09638280400018619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape, T. L. B., J. Kim, and B. Weiner. 2002. “The Shaping of Individual Meanings Assigned to Assistive Technology: A Review of Personal Factors.” Disability and Rehabilitation 24 (1–3): 5–20. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekkedal, A. M. 2013. “Teachers' Use of Assistive Listening Devices in Inclusive Schools.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 16 (4): 297–315. doi:10.1080/15017419.2012.761152.
   Google Scholar
• Riddle, S. 2007. “A Sociology of Special Education.” In The Sage Handbook of Special Education, edited by L. Florian, 34–45. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shevlin, M., E. Winter, and P. Flynn. 2013. “Developing Inclusive Practices: Teacher Perceptions of Opportunities and Constraints in the Republic of Ireland.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 17 (10): 1119–1133. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2012.742143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. H. 2013. “Deaf Adults: Retrospective Narratives of School Experiences and Teacher Expectations.” Disability & Society 28 (5): 673–686. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.732537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström, S. 2012. “Disabled Pupils’ Use of Assistive ICT in Norwegian Schools.” In Assistive Technologies, edited by F. A. Auat Cheein, 25–48. Kroatia: InTech. ISBN 978-953-51-0348-6.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström, S., and B. Ytterhus. 2010. “The Use and Non-use of Assistive Technologies from the World of Information and Communication Technology by Visually Impaired Young People: A Walk on the Tightrope of Peer-inclusion.” Disability & Society 25 (3): 303–315. doi: 10.1080/09687591003701215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Insurance Administration. 2003. The Provision of Assistive Aids – Part of a Larger System Information about the Provision of Assistive Aids. Oslo: National Insurance Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Tøssebro, J., and H. Lundeby. 2002. Å vokse opp med funksjonshemming [To Grow up with a Disability]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Wendelborg, C. 2014. “Fra barnehage til videregående skole – veien ut av jevnaldermiljøet [From Kindergarten to High School – The Road out of the Peer Group].” In Oppvekst med funksjonshemming Familie, livsløp og overganger [Family, Life Course and Transitions], edited by J. Tøssebro and C. Wendelborg, 35–79. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Wendelborg, C., and Tøssebro, J. 2010. “Marginalisation Processes in Inclusive Education in Norway: A Longitudinal Study of Classroom Participation.” Disability & Society 25 (6): 701–714. doi:10.1080/09687599.2010.505744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wielandt, T., K. McKenna, L. Tooth, and J. Strong. 2006. “Factors that Predict the Post-charge Use of Recommended Assistive Technology (AT).” Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 1 (1–2): 29–40. doi: 10.1080/09638280500167159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Witsø, A. E. 2013. “Participation in Older Adults – In the Context of Receiving Home-based Services.” Doctoral thesis, NTNU.
   Google Scholar