Towards a tinkering participatory research method in mental health

References

• Barnes, M. 1999. “Users as Citizens: Collective Action and the Local Governance of Welfare.” Social Policy & Administration 33 (1): 73–90. doi: 10.1111/1467-9515.00132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentall, R. 2009. “Roll Over Kraepelin.” In Mental Health Still Matters, edited by J. Reynolds, R. Muston, S. Heller, J. Leach, M. McCormick, J. Wallcraft, and M. Walsh, 16–23. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2002. “User Involvement in Research and Evaluation: Liberation or Regulation?” Social Policy and Society 1 (02): 95–105. doi:10.1017/S1474746402000222.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2012. “The Theory and Philosophy Behind User Involvement.” In Social Care, Service Users and User Involvement, edited by P. Beresford and S. Carr, 21–36. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., and K. Boxal. 2013. “Where Do Service Users’ Knowledges sit in Relation to Professional and Academic Understandings of Knowledge?” In Mental Health Service Users in Research: Critical Sociological Perspectives, edited by K. Boxal and P. Staddon, 69–86. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, M., and K. Kristiansen. 2004. “Recovery-Oriented Professionals: Helping Relationships in Mental Health Services.” Journal of Mental Health 13 (5): 493–505. doi:10.1080/09638230400006809 x.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. 2009. Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cowden, S., and G. Singh. 2007. “The ‘User’: Friend, foe or Fetish? A Critical Exploration of User Involvement in Health and Social Care.” Critical Social Policy 27 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1177/0261018307072205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, M. L., and N. Crossley. 2001. “‘Patient’ Voices, Social Movements and the Habitus; How Psychiatric Survivors ‘speak out.’” Social Science & Medicine 52 (10): 1477–1489. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00257-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, K., L. Todres, and K. Galvin. 2009. “Lifeworld-led Healthcare Is More Than Patient-led Care: An Existential View of Well-Being.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (3): 265–271. doi:10.1007/s11019-008-9174-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L. 2003. Living Outside Mental Illness: Qualitative Studies of Recovery in Schizophrenia. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D., P. Ridgway, T. Schmutte, and M. O’Connell. 2009. “Purposes and Goals of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research.” In Handbook of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research, edited by J. Wallcraft, M. Amering, and B. Schrank, 87–98. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dehue, T. 2010. Changing the Rules: Psychology in the Netherlands, 1900–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• El Enany, N., G. Currie, and A. Lockett. 2013. A Paradox in Healthcare Service Development: Professionalization of Service Users. Social Science & Medicine 80: 24–30. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. 2002. “Negotiating the Swamp: The Opportunity and Challenge of Reflexivity in Research Practice.” Qualitative Research 2 (2): 209–230. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200205
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. 2009. Debating Phenomenological Research Methods. Phenomenology and Practice 3 (1): 6–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power & the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. 1996. The Enigma of Health: The Art of Healing in a Scientific Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, K., and L. Todres. 2011. “Research Based Empathic Knowledge for Nursing: A Translational Strategy for Disseminating Phenomenological Research Findings to Provide Evidence for Caring Practice.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 48 (4): 522–530. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendlin, E. 2003. Focusing. London: Rider.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. 1987. “Probabilistic Thinking and the Fight Against Subjectivity.” In The Probabilistic Revolution. Volume 2: Ideas in Science, edited by J. Krüger, G. Gigerenzer, and M. S. Morgan, 11–33. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A. 1985. “Towards a Phenomenologically Based Unified Paradigm for Psychology.” In The Changing Reality of Modern Man: Essays in Honour of Jan Hendrik van den Berg, edited by D. Kruger, 20–34. Pittsburg, PA: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A. 2009. The Descriptive Phenomenological Method in Psychology: A Modified Husserlian Approach. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, A. 2004. “The Role of Theory in Disability Research – Springboard or Strait-Jacket?” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 6 (1): 55–70. doi: 10.1080/15017410409512639
   Google Scholar
• Keat, R., N. Abercrombie, and N. Whiteley. 1994. The Authority of the Consumer. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F., N. T. Hasan, M. C. Roberts, and J. E. Barnett. 2008. “Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology.” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 39 (6): 658–662. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.39.6.658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 2002. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• May, R., E. Angel, and H. F. Ellenberger, eds. 1958. Existence: A New Dimension in Psychiatry and Psychology. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. 2009. “What’s in a Name: ‘Client’, ‘Patient’, ‘Customer’, ‘Consumer’, ‘Expert by Experience’, ‘Service User’ – What’s Next?” British Journal of Social Work 39 (6): 1101–1117. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWade, B., D. Milton, and P. Beresford. 2015. “Mad Studies and Neurodiversity: A Dialogue.” Disability & Society 30 (2): 305–309. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.1000512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1986. “Social Policy and Disability: Some Theoretical Issues.” Disability, Handicap & Society 1 (1): 5–17. doi:10.1080/02674648666780021.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2): 101–114. doi:10.1080/02674649266780141.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1997. “Emancipatory Research: Realistic Goal or Impossible Dream?” In Doing Disability Research, edited by C. Barnes and G. Mercer, 15–31. Leeds: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, S., L. Clarke-Jones, R. Rees, R. Milne, P. Buchanan, J. Gabbay, G. Gyte, A. Oakley, and K. Stein. 2004. “Involving Consumers in Research and Development Agenda Setting for the NSH: Developing an Evidence-Based Approach.” Health Technology Assessment 8 (15): 1–148. doi: 10.1017/S026646230400073X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., and B. Sapey. 2006. Social Work with Disabled People. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pethick, S. 2015. Affectivity and Philosophy after Spinoza and Nietzsche: Making Knowledge the Most Powerful Affect. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Plumb, A. 2011. “Distress or Disability: A Discussion Document.” In Distress or Disability? Proceedings of A Symposium Held at Lancaster University, 15–16 November 2011, edited by J. Anderson, B. Sapey, and H. Spandler, 3–12. Lancaster: Centre for Disability Research.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. P. 2006. “An Agenda for the Second Generation of Qualitative Studies.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 1 (2): 68–77. doi: 10.1080/17482620500539248
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, K. C., and D. Evans. 2013. “Theorising Service User Involvement from a Researcher Perspective.” In Mental Health Service Users in Research: Critical Sociological Perspectives, edited by P. Staddon, 39–51. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, D. 2015. “Psycho-emotional Disablism in the Lives of People Experiencing Mental Distress.” In Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement, edited by H. Spandler, J. Anderson, and B. Sapey, 99–112. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rissmiller, D. J., and J. H. Rissmiller. 2006. “Evolution of the Antipsychiatry Movement into Mental Health Consumerism.” Psychiatric Services 57 (6): 863–866. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.6.863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. 2012. “Critical Disability Studies: Rethinking the Conventions for the Age of Postmodernity.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by N. Watson, A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas, 30–41. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2001. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Electric Book.
   Google Scholar
• Spring, B. 2007. “Evidence-Based Practice in Clinical Psychology: What It Is, Why It Matters; What You Need to Know.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 63 (7): 611–631. doi:10.1002/jclp.20373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staddon, P. 2013. Mental Health Service Users in Research: Critical Sociological Perspectives. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staley, K., T. Kabir, and G. Szmukler. 2013. “Service Users as Collaborators in Mental Health Research: Less Stick, More Carrot.” Psychological Medicine 43 (6): 1121–1125. doi:10.1017/S0033291712001663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, E., and M. Priestley. 1996. “Parasites, Pawns and Partners: Disability Research and the Role of Non-Disabled Researchers.” The British Journal of Sociology 47 (4): 699–716. doi:10.2307/591081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenaeus, F. 2000. The Hermeneutics of Medicine and the Phenomenology of Health: Steps Towards a Philosophy of Medical Practice (vol. 5). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, A. 2009. This Is Survivor Research. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Szmukler, G. 2009. “Service Users in Research and a ‘well ordered science.’” Journal of Mental Health 18 (2): 87–90. doi: 10.1080/09638230902835028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N. 2013. Antifragile: Things that Gain from Disorder. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tangvald-Pedersen, O., and R. Bongaardt. 2011. “Tid og tilhørighet: Opplevelsen av god psykisk helse og dens implikasjoner for godt psykisk helsearbeid. [Time and Belonging: The Experience of Good Mental Health and its Implications for Good Mental Health Work].” Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid 8 (2): 100–108.
   Google Scholar
• Todres, L. 2007. Embodied Enquiry: Phenomenological Touchstones for Research, Psychotherapy and Spirituality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Todres, L., K. Galvin, and K. Dahlberg. 2007. “Lifeworld-led Healthcare: Revisiting a Humanising Philosophy that Integrates Emerging Trends.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (1): 53–63. doi:10.1007/s11019-006-9012-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Todres, L., and I. Holloway. 2004. “Descriptive Phenomenology: Life-World as Evidence.” In New Qualitative Methodologies in Health and Social Care Research, edited by F. Rapport, 79–96. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wallcraft, J., M. Amering, and B. Schrank, eds. 2009. Handbook of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., and P. Beresford, eds. 2002. Madness, Distress and Postmodernity: Putting the Record Straight. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar