Quality Matters Review of LIB 2210: Applying the QM Rubric for Higher Education to an Information Literacy Course

References

• Anderson, T. D., & Garrison, D. R. (1995). Critical thinking in distance education: Developing critical communities in an audio teleconference context. Higher Education, 29(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of College & Research Libraries. (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
   Google Scholar
• Bernnard, D., Bobish, G., Bullish, D., Hecker, J., Holden, I., Hosier, A., Jacobsen, T., & Loney, T. (2014). The information literacy user’s guide: An open, online textbook. Open SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles-Terry, M., & Donovan, C. (2016). Serving notice on the one-shot: Changing roles for instruction librarians. International Information & Library Review, 48(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1176457
   Google Scholar
• Butler, B. D., Sargent, A., & Smith, A. (2021). Introduction to college research, Cohen, C. M., Ed. Pressbooks.
   Google Scholar
• CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines, version 2.2. The UDL guidelines. UDL Guidelines. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, E., & Mitchell, M. E. (1996). “BCK2SKOL”: A networked learning model classroom. Education for Information, 14(4), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-1996-14403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coaplen, C. J., Hollis, E. T., & Bailey, R. (2013). Going beyond the content: Building community through collaboration in online teaching. The Researcher: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(3), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. (2002). Course management software: Where’s the library? EduCause. https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/article-downloads/erm0239.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dewald, N. H. (1999). Transporting good library instruction practices into the web environment: An analysis of online tutorials. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(99)80172-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, K. A. (2000). Library research success: Designing an online tutorial to teach information literacy skills to first-year students. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00025-7
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, K., Henry, J., Thompson, D. S., Vance, C. K., & Wilson, M. (2021). Using canvas commons to transform information literacy instruction. In B. Holland (Ed.), Handbook of research on library response to the COVID-19 pandemic (pp. 231–247). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6-449.3.ch012
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In P. Rogers, G. A. Berg, J. V. Boettecher, L. Justice, & K. Schenk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (4th ed., pp. 352–355). Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Getty, N. K., Burd, B., Burns, S. K., & Piele, L. (2000). Using courseware to deliver library instruction via the web: Four examples. Reference Services Review, 28(4), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320010359678
   Google Scholar
• Goodsett, M. (2017). An eLearning partnership: Applying the quality matters rubric to online library instructional materials [poster presentation] [Paper presentation].Academic Library Association of Ohio (ALAO) Annual Conference, 2017, Columbus, Ohio, United States. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/msl_facpub/148
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, L. R., & Mancilla, R. (2017). The impact of Quality Matters professional development on teaching across delivery formats. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1301145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenward, K., & O’Kelly, M. (2017). Online and hybrid instructional design for liaison librarians: A new certification program. West, B.K., Hoffman, B.K., Costello, M. (Eds.), Creative instructional design: Practical applications for librarians (pp. 243–262). Association of College & Research Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Loesch, M. F. (2011). From both sides, now: Librarians team up with computer scientist to deliver virtual computer-information literacy instruction. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 5(4), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2011.641712
   Google Scholar
• Mudd, A., Summey, T., & Upson, M. (2015). It takes a village to design a course: Embedding a librarian in course design. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 9(1–2), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2014.946349
   Google Scholar
• Newby, J., Eagleson, L., & Pfander, J. (2014). Quality Matters: New roles for librarians using standards for online course design. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(1–2), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2014.916245
   Google Scholar
• Pagowsky, N. (2021). The contested one-shot: Deconstructing power structures to imagine new futures. College & Research Libraries, 82(3), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.3.300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickens, K., & Witte, G. (2015). Circle the wagons & bust out the big guns! Tame the “wild west” of distance librarianship using Quality Matters™ benchmarks. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 9(1-2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2014.946352
   Google Scholar
• Quality Matters. (2018). Higher education rubric workbook: Standards for course design, 6th Edition for online and blended courses. MarylandOnline, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Matters. (2022). The QM higher education rubric, seventh edition revision is underway. Quality Matters.org. https://www.qualitymatters.org/qm-membership/faqs/he-rubric-seventh-edition-revision
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, E., Meiser, J. L., & Ballard, P. J. (2016). The Information Literacy project: Using QM to achieve QA in library instruction [Conference Presentation] [Paper presentation].Quality Matters Annual Conference. https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/resource-center/conference-presentations/information-literacy-project-using-qm-achieve
   Google Scholar
• Shank, J. D., & Dewald, N. H. (2003). Establishing our presence in courseware: Adding library services to the virtual classroom. Information Technology and Libraries, 22(1), 38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheets, L. A., Barry, M., & Bosch, E. K. (2022). Design matters: How a course review influenced online teaching best practices. Advances in Online Education: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, 1(1), 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Society of College, National and University Libraries. (2015). Seven pillars model of information literacy: A model defining core abilities and understandings of information literacy in higher education. SCONUL. https://www.sconul.ac.uk/page/seven-pillars-of-information-literacy
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Percent of students enrolled in distance education courses. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/TrendGenerator/app/answer/2/42
   Google Scholar
• Vega Garcia, S. A., Stacy-Bates, K. K., Alger, J., & Marupova, R. (2017). Peer evaluation of teaching in an online information literacy course. Portal, 17(3), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Yantz, J., & Lef, Y. (2018). Meeting QM standards through hybrid blended learning [Conference presentation] [Paper presentation].Quality Matters Mountain Regional Conference. https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/resource-center/conference-presentations/meeting-qm-standards-through-hybrid-blended
   Google Scholar