Epistasis-Driven Bias in the Estimates of Additive and Dominance Genetic Variance in Dolichos Bean (Lablab Purpureus L.) Var. Lignosus

REFERENCES

• Baker, R. J. 1984. Quantitative genetic principles in plant breeding. In Gene manipulation in plant improvement, ed. J. P. Gustafson, 147 −176. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barona, M. A. A., J. M. C. Filho, V. D. S. Santos, and I. O. Geraldi. 2012. Epistatic effects on grain yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Crop Breeding Applications Biotechnic 12:231–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chahal, G. S., T. H. Singh, and D. S. Virk. 1991. Measurement and utilization of non-allelic interactions in plant breeding. India: Crop Improvement Society.
   Google Scholar
• Cockerham, C. C., and H. Tachida. 1987. Evolution and maintenance of quantitative Genetic Variation by Mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 84:6205–09. doi:10.1073/pnas.84.17.6205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravois, K. A. 1994. Diallel analysis of head rice percentage, total milled rice percentage, and rough rice yield. Crop Science 34:42–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. B. 2001. Epistasis and plant breeding. Plant Breeder Reviews 21:27–92.
   Google Scholar
• Jinks, J. L. 1981. The genetic frame work of plant breeding Phil. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 292:407–19. doi:10.1098/rstb.1981.0036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinks, J. L., and J. M. Perkins. 1970. A general method for the detection of additive, dominance and epistatic components of variation. III. F2 and backcross populations. Heredity 25:419–29. doi:10.1038/hdy.1970.42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinks, J. L., J. M. Perkins, and E. L. Breese. 1969. A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. II. Application to inbred lines. Heredity 24:45–57. doi:10.1038/hdy.1969.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinks, J. L., and D. S. Virk. 1977. A modified triple test-cross analysis to test and allow for inadequate testers. Heredity 39:165–70. doi:10.1038/hdy.1977.53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearsey, M. J., and J. L. Jinks. 1968. A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits I. Theory . Heredity 23:403–09. doi:10.1038/hdy.1968.52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearsey, M. J., and H. S. Pooni. 1996. The genetical analysis of quantitative traits, 1st ed. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Keerthi, C. M., S. Ramesh, M. Byregowda, A. M. Rao, B. S. Rajendra Prasad, and P. V. Vaijayanthi. 2014. Genetics of growth habit and photoperiodic response to flowering time in dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet). Journal of Genetics 93:203–06. doi:10.1007/s12041-014-0336-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketata, H., E. L. Smith, L. K. Edwards, and R. W. McNew. 1976. Detection of epistatic, additive, and dominance variation in winter wheat. Crop Science 16:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak, G. S., M. A. Haq, M. Ashraf, and G. R. Tahir. 2002. Triple test cross analysis for some morphological traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Euphytica 126:413–20. doi:10.1023/A:1019987620535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., B. C. Sood, T. R. Sharma, R. K. Chahota, and S. Sood. 2011. Determination of gene action for some biometrical traits in Lens culinaris Medik. under mid-hill conditions of north-western Himalayas. Journal of Genetics 90:493–97. doi:10.1007/s12041-011-0106-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal, C., K. Hariprasanna, B. M. Chikani, and H. K. Gor. 2014. Inter-allelic interactions in the inheritance of physical-quality traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Australian Journal Crop Sciences 8(7):1049–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, T. F. C. 2013. Epistasis and quantitative traits: Using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions. Nature Reviews Genetics 15(1):22–33. doi:10.1038/nrg3627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magoon, M. L., S. Amar, and K. L. Mehra. 1974. Improved field been for dryland forage. Indian Farming 24(2):5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moreto, A. L., M. A. P. Ramalho, and A. T. Bruzi. 2012. Epistasis in an Andean  × Mesoamerican cross of common bean. Euphytica 186:755–60. doi:10.1007/s10681-011-0578-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nene, Y. L. 2006. Indian pulses through millennia. Asian Agri-history 10(3):179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Pawar, I. S., M. Yunus, S. Singh, and V. P. Singh. 1994. Detection of additive, dominance, and epistatic variation in wheat using triple test cross method. Indian Journal Genetics 54(3):275–80.
   Google Scholar
• Pooni, H. S., and J. L. Jinks. 1981. The true nature of the non-allelic interactions in Nicotiana rustica revealed by association crosses. Heredity 47:253–58. doi:10.1038/hdy.1981.81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pooni, H. S., and J. L. Jinks. 1982. Comparative analysis of association and dispersion crosses to detect linkage and epistatic components of variation. Heredity 49:211–20. doi:10.1038/hdy.1982.87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, D. 2000. Plant breeding: Analysis and exploitation of variation. New Delhi, India: Narosa Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., G. Singh, Y. Singh, and S. Sood. 2008. Detection of genetic components of variation for biometrical traits in garden pea. International Journal of Vegetable Science 14:67–81. doi:10.1080/19315260801890658.
   Google Scholar
• Shivashankar, G., and R. S. Kulkarni. 1989. Field bean [Dolichos lablab (L.), var. lignosus Prain. Indian Horticulture 34:24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., S. Kumar, I. S. Pawar, and I. Singh. 1992. Detection and estimation of additive and dominance components and their interactions with sowing date in the presence and absence of epistasis in wheat. Haryana Agricultural University Journal Researcher 22:165–69.
   Google Scholar
• Srinives, P., and W. Tangbunitivong. 1991. Genetic study of yield and yield components in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) grown in dry and wet seasons. Journal of the National Research Council of Thailand 23(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya, H. D., and S. N. Nigam. 1998. Epistasis for vegetative and reproductive traits in peanut. Crop Science 38:44–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virk, D. S., and J. L. Jinks. 1977. The consequences of using inadequate testers in the simplified triple test-cross. Heredity 38:237–51. doi:10.1038/hdy.1977.29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishwanatha, S. R., G. Shivashankar, and A. Manjunath. 1971. Nonseason-bound Dolichos lablab with new plant type. Current Science 40:667–68.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, W. E. 1982. Selection in segregating generations of autogamous species. I. selection response for combined selection. Euphytica 31:493–502. doi:10.1007/BF00021668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar