An Experimental Study on the Effect of Visual Tasks on Discomfort Due to Peripheral Glare

References

• Aarts S, Van De Akker M, Winkens B. 2014. The importance of effect sizes. Eur J Gen Pract. 20:61–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altomonte S, Kent MG, Tregenza PR, Wilson R. 2016. Visual task difficulty and temporal influences in glare response. Build Environ. 95:209–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman SM, Bullimore MA, Jacobs RJ, Bailey IL, Gandhi N. 1994. An objective measure of discomfort glare. J Illum Eng Soc. 23:40–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce PR. 2014. Human factors in lighting. 3rd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent DE. 1958. Perception and communication. Applied Psychology Unit of the Medical Research Council, Cambridge. London (UK): Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• [CIBSE] Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. 1994. Code for interior lighting. London (UK): CIBSE.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission International de L’Eclairage. 1995. Discomfort glare in interior lighting. CIE. Publication No. CIE 117-1995. Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• [CIE] Commission International de L’Eclairage. 2016. ILV: international lighting vocabulary. 2nd ed. CIE. Publication No. DIS 017/E: 2016. Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1965. Some statistical issues in psychological research. In: Wolman BB, Editor. Handbook of clinical psychology. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer JB, Schreuder DA. 1967. Glare as a criterion for quality in street lighting. IESTrans. 32(2):117–35.
   Google Scholar
• DiCiccio EB. 1996. Bootstrap confidence intervals. Stat Sci. 11(3):189–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver J. 2001. A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. Br J Psychol. 92:53–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B. 1987. Better bootstrap confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc. 82(397):171–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis PD. 2010. The essential guide to effect sizes: statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson CJ. 2009. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 40(5):532–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. London (UK): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Field A, Wilcox RR. 2017. Robust statistical methods: A primer for clinical psychologists and experimental psychopathology researchers. Behav Res Ther. 98:19–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotios S, Uttley J, Cheal C. 2016. Research note: maintaining foveal fixation during a peripheral detection task. Lighting Res Technol. 48(7):898–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellatly AW, Weintraub DJ. 1990. User reconfigurations of the de Boer rating scale for discomfort glare. Ann Arbor (MI): The University of Michigan: Transportation Research Institute. UMTRI-90-20.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkinson RG. 1960. A note on the use of indices of glare discomfort for a code of lighting. IESTrans. 25(3):135–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkinson RG. 1972. Glare from daylighting in buildings. Appl Ergon. 3(4):206–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkinson RG, Bradley RC. 1960. A study of glare from very large sources. Illum Eng. 55(5):288–94.
   Google Scholar
• [IESNA] Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. 2011. Tenth edition. New York (NY): IESNA.
   Google Scholar
• Iwata T, Shukuya M, Somekawa N, Kimura K. 1992. Experimental study on discomfort glare caused by windows: subjective response to glare from a simulated window. Journal Archit Plann Environ Engng. 432:21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kent MG, Altomonte S, Wilson R, Tregenza PR. 2017b. Temporal effects on glare response from daylight. Build Environ. 113:49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent MG, Fotios S, Altomonte S. 2017a. Discomfort glare evaluation: the influence of anchor bias in luminance adjustments. Lighting Res Technol. doi:10.1177/1477153517734280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent MG, Fotios S, Altomonte S. 2018. Order effects when using Hopkinson’s multiple criterion scale of discomfort due to glare. Build Environ. 136:54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane RD, Chua PML, Dolan RJ. 1999. Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures. Neuropsychologia. 37:989–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang PJ, Greenwald MK, Bradley MM, Hamm AO. 1993. Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioural reactions. Psychophysiology. 30:261–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logadóttir A, Christoffersen J, Fotios S. 2011. Investigating the use of an adjustment task to set the preferred illuminance in a workspace environment. Lighting Res Technol. 43:403–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logadóttir A, Fotios S, Christoffersen J, Hansen SS, Corell DD, Dam-Hansen C. 2013. Investigating the use of adjustment task to set preferred colour of ambient illumination. Color Res Appl. 38(1):46–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckiesh M, Guth SK. 1949. Brightnesses in visual field at borderline between comfort and discomfort (BCD). Illumin Eng. 44:650–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacGowan D. 2010. Correspondence. Lighting Res Technol. 42:121.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews G, Davies DR, Holley PJ. 1990. Extravision, arousal and visual sustained attention: the role of resource availability. Pers Individ Dif. 11(11):1159–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhaus WKE, Bailey IL 1992. Large area glare sources and their effect on discomfort and visual performance at computer workstations. Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting; Houston, Texas, October 4–9. p. 1825–29.
   Google Scholar
• Paul BM, Einhorn HD. 1999. Discomfort glare from small light sources. Lighting Res Technol. 31(4):139–44.
   Google Scholar
• Petherbridge P, Hopkinson RG. 1950. Discomfort glare and the lighting of buildings. IESTrans. XV(2):39–79.
   Google Scholar
• Pulpitlova J, Detkova P. 1993. Impact of the cultural and social background on the visual perception in living and working perception. Proceedings of the International Symposium: Design of Amenity; Fukuoka, Japan, October 5–8. p. 92–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sivak M, Flannagan M, Ensing M, Simmons CJ. 1989. Discomfort glare is task dependent. Report No: UMTRI-89-27. Ann Arbor (MI): The University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Stone PT, Harker SDP. 1973. Individual and group differences in discomfort glare responses. Lighting Res Technol. 5(1):41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Tuaycharoen N, Tregenza PR. 2005. Discomfort glare from interesting images. Lighting Res Technol. 37(4):329–41.
   Google Scholar
• Tuaycharoen N, Tregenza PR. 2007. View and discomfort glare from windows. Lighting Res Technol. 39(2):185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velds M. 2002. User acceptance studies to evaluate discomfort glare in daylit rooms. Solar Energy. 73(2):95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuilleumier P. 2005. How brains beware: neural mechanism of emotional attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 9(12):585–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienold J, Christoffersen J. 2006. Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energ Buildings. 38:743–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Z, Yu D, Wang L, Zhu X, Guo J, Wang Z. 2016. Effects of valance and arousal on emotional word processing are modulated by concreteness: behavioural and EPR evidence from a lexical decision task. Int J Psychophysiol. 110:231–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar