The Role of Morality in Individuals’ Willingness to Offend Within a Rational Choice Perspective

References

• Agnew, R. (2014). Social concern and crime: Moving beyond the assumption of simple self-interest. Criminology, 52(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Pine Forge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the Inner City. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Antonaccio, O., & Tittle, C. R. (2008). Morality, self-control, and crime. Criminology, 46(2), 479–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustyn, M. B., & McGloin, J. M. (2013). The risk of informal socializing with peers: Considering gender differences across predatory delinquency and substance use. Justice Quarterly, 30(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.597417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avdija, A. S. (2008). Evidence-based policing: A comparative analysis of eight experimental studies focused in the area of targeted policing. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 3(2), 110–128.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, R., Paternoster, R., & Ward, S. (1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law & Society Review, 26(2), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., & Regalia, C. (2001). Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton-Crosby, J. (2020). The nature and role of morality in situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820977099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton-Crosby, J., & Hirtenlehner, H. (2020). The role of morality and self-control in conditioning the criminogenic effect of provocation. A partial test of situational action theory. Deviant Behavior, 42(10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1738645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. In G. Becker & W. Landes (Eds.), Essays in the economics of crime and punishment (pp. 1–54). NBER.
   Google Scholar
• Burkett, S. R., & Ward, D. A. (1993). A note on perceptual deterrence, religiously based moral condemnation, and social control. Criminology, 31(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01124.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway, S. D. (2013). Is there any logic to using logit: Finding the right tool for the increasingly important job of risk prediction. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(3), 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. C. N., Wu, A. M. S., & Hung, E. P. W. (2010). Invulnerability and the intention to drink and drive: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(6), 1549–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention. Crime and Justice, 19, 91–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/449230
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, J. K. (2015). Moral propensity, setting, and choice: A partial test of situational action theory. Deviant Behavior, 37(7), 811–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1145024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish, C., & Clarke, R. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cozens, P., & Sun, M. Y. (2018). Exploring crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) and students’ fear of crime at an Australian university campus using prospect and refuge theory. Property Management, 37(2), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-04-2018-0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currit, N. (2002). Inductive regression: Overcoming OLS limitations with the general regression neural network. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26(4), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00045-X
   Google Scholar
• Exum, M. L., Turner, M. G., & Hartman, J. L. (2012). Self-reported intentions to offend: All talk and no action? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(4), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-011-9148-9
   Google Scholar
• Feng, C., Wang, H., Lu, N., Chen, T., He, H., Lu, Y., & Tu, X. M. (2014). Log-transformation and its implications for data analysis. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26(2), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.02.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson, L. M., & Wormith, J. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of moral reconation therapy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(9), 1076–1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X12447771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallupe, O., & Baron, S. W. (2014). Morality, self-control, deterrence, and drug use: Street youths and situational action theory. Crime & Delinquency, 60(2), 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128709359661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. (2018, March 15). You need 16 times the sample size to estimate an interaction than to estimate a main effect. Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science. https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2018/03/15/need16/
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. P. (1968). Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. The Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 48(4), 515–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H. G., & Bursik, R. J. (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law & Society Review, 24(3), 837–862. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H. G., & Green, D. E. (1980). Legal punishment, social disapproval and internalization as inhibitors of illegal behavior. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 71(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1142704
   Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H. G., & Green, D. E. (1981). Deterrence and the morally committed. The Sociological Quarterly, 22(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1981.tb02204.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H., Tittle, C., Bursik, R., Jr., & Arneklev, B. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, S., & Pogarsky, G. (2020). Morality, deterrability, and offender decision making. Justice Quarterly, 39(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1709884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, R., Vugteveen, J., Warrens, M. J., & Kruyen, P. M. (2019). An empirical analysis of alleged misunderstandings of coefficient alpha. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(4), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1547523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B. A. (2010). Deterrence and deterrability. Criminology, 48(2), 417–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00191.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaynes, C. M., & Loughran, T. A. (2019). Social preferences as an individual difference in offender decision-making. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56(1), 129–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427818798684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J., & Chalfin, A. (2022). Ambient lighting, use of outdoor spaces and perceptions of public safety: Evidence from a survey experiment. Security Journal, 35(3), 694–724. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-021-00296-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Little, G. L. (2001). Meta-analysis of MRT recidivism research on post-incarceration adult felony offenders. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 10(3/4), 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Qiu, G., & Zhang, S. (2022). Situational action theory and school bullying: Rethinking the moral filter. Crime & Delinquency, 68(4), 572–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720974318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (1997). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (Vol. 7). Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, T. A., Pogarsky, G., Piquero, A. R., & Paternoster, R. (2012). Re-examining the functional form of the certainty effect in deterrence theory. Justice Quarterly, 29(5), 712–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.583931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBee, M. (2010). Modeling outcomes with floor or ceiling effects: An introduction to the Tobit model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210379095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review, 27(3), 467–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1994). Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implications of a theory of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology, 32(4), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, F. I. (1958). Family relationships and delinquent behavior. John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2002). Notes on the use of data transformations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(6), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, D. W., Finken, L. L., & McMorris, B. J. (2002). Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance II: Tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(4), 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021198509929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., Jaynes, C. M., & Wilson, T. (2017). Rational choice theory and interest in the “fortune of other.” The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(6), 847–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427817707240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., & Simpson, S. (1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law & Society Review, 30(3), 549–584. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, L. J. R., Svensson, R., & Hirtenlehner, H. (2018). Testing situational action theory: A narrative review of studies published between 2006 and 2015. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piliavin, I., Gartner, R., Thornton, C., & Matsueda, R. L. (1986). Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review, 51(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., Bouffard, J. A., Piquero, N. L., & Craig, J. M. (2016). Does morality condition the deterrent effect of perceived certainty among incarcerated felons? Crime & Delinquency, 62(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713505484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., Paternoster, R., Pogarsky, G., & Loughran, T. (2011). Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7(1), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A., & Tibbetts, S. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders’ decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly, 13(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600093061
   Google Scholar
• Pogarsky, G. (2002). Identifying “deterrable” offenders: Implications for research on deterrence. Justice Quarterly, 19(3), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogarsky, G. (2007). Deterrence and individual differences among convicted offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-006-9019-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckless, W. (1961). The crime problem. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, S. P., Pickett, J. T., Intravia, J., & Thompson, A. J. (2022). On the measurement of subjective apprehension risk. Criminal Justice Review, 47(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016820978827
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M., Smoak, N. D., & Liu, J. (2006). Self-reported deviant computer behavior: A big-5, moral choice, and manipulative exploitive behavior analysis. Deviant Behavior, 27(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620600605333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, C. (2022). To speed or not to speed: Applying situational action theory to speeding behavior. Deviant Behavior, 44(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2022.2114865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, Z. R., Kan, E., Frick, P. J., & Cauffman, E. (2022). Not (entirely) guilty: The role of co-offenders in diffusing responsibility for crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 59(4), 415–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278211046256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers, D., & Reinecke, J. (2018). Conditional relevance of controls: A simultaneous test of the influences of self-control and deterrence on criminal behaviour in the context of situational action theory. European Journal of Criminology, 15(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817732191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, E. P., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., & Fagan, J. (2011). Moral disengagement among serious juvenile offenders: A longitudinal study of the relations between morally disengaged attitudes and offending. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1619–1632. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. R., & Silver, E. (2020). The nature and role of morality in offending: A moral foundations approach. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 343–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, R., McCutcheon, M., & Lal, D. (2020). Reducing speeding via inanimate police presence: An evaluation of a police‐directed field study regarding motorist behavior. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(3), 997–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinella, M. (2007). Normative data and a short form of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450600588881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, R. (2015). An examination of the interaction between morality and deterrence in offending: A research note. Crime & Delinquency, 61(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713486068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, R., Weerman, F. M., Pauwels, L. J. R., Bruinsma, G. J. N., & Bernasco, W. (2013). Moral emotions and offending: Do feelings of anticipated shame and guilt mediate the effect of socialization on offending?. European Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370812454393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeten, G. (2012). Scaling criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(3), 533–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-011-9160-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. J., & Mccuddy, T. (2019). Affinity, affiliation, and guilt: Examining between- and within-person variability in delinquent peer influence. Justice Quarterly, 37(4), 715–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1634752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tittle, C. (1977). Sanction fear and the maintenance of social order. Social Forces, 55(3), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2577457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tittle, C. R., Antonaccio, O., Botchkovar, E., & Kranidioti, M. (2010). Expected utility, self-control, morality, and criminal probability. Social Science Research, 39(6), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, L. R. (2017). Moral reconation therapy and Its effect on moral reasoning [ Doctoral dissertation, California Lutheran University ProQuest].
   Google Scholar
• Walters, G. (2020). Moral disengagement as a mediator of the co-offending–delinquency relationship in serious juvenile offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 44(5), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, P.-O. H. (2004). Crime as alternative: Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In J. McCord (Ed.), Beyond empiricism: Institutions and intentions in the study of crime, advances in criminological theory (1st ed., Vol. 13, pp. 1–37). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, P.-O. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2006). The explanation of crime: Context, mechanisms and development. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, P. O. H., & Svensson, R. (2008). Why are English youths more violent than Swedish youths?: A comparative study of the role of crime propensity, lifestyles and their interactions in two cities. European Journal of Criminology, 5(3), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370808090835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. R., & Hawkins, R. (1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. Law & Society Review, 20(4), 545. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T., Loughran, T., & Brame, R. (2020). Substantial bias in the Tobit estimator: Making a case for alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 37(2), 231–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1517220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. R. E., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Paternoster, R. (2004). Does the perceived risk of punishment deter criminally prone individuals? Rational choice, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(2), 180–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427803260263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar