Relational sensitivity in participatory design

References

• Agid, S., and E. Chin. 2019. “Making and Negotiating Value: Design and Collaboration with Community Led Groups.” CoDesign 15 (1): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1563191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akama, Y. 2015. “Being Awake to Ma: Designing the Between-Ness as a Way of Becoming with.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akama, Y. 2017. “Surrendering to the Ocean: Practices of Mindfulness and Presence in Designing.” In Routledge Handbook for Sustainable Design, edited by R. B. Egenhoefer, 12. London: Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., D. Evans, S. Keen, F. McMillan, M. McMillan, and P. West. 2017. “Designing Digital and Creative Scaffolds to Strengthen Indigenous Nations: Being Wiradjuri by Practising Sovereignty.” Digital Creativity 28 (1): 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2017.1291525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., P. Hagen, and D. Whaanga-Schollum. 2019. “Problematizing Replicable Design to Practice Respectful, Reciprocal, and Relational Co-Designing with Indigenous People.” Design and Culture 11 (1): 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1571306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., and A. Light. 2018. “Practices of Readiness: Punctuation, Poise and the Contingencies of Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers – Volume 1. PDC ’18: Participatory Design Conference 2018, 1–12. Hasselt and Genk Belgium: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210594.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., and A. Light. 2020. “Readiness for Contingency: Punctuation, Poise, and Co-Design.” CoDesign 16 (1): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1722177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, P. V. K., and W. S. Mosleh. 2021. “Conflicts in Co-Design: Engaging with Tangible Artefacts in Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration.” CoDesign 17 (4): 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1740279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaam, M., Comber, R., Clarke, RE., Windlin, C., Ståhl, A., Höök, K., Fitzpatrick, G., et al. 2019. “Emotion Work in Experience-Centred Design.” Paper presented at CHI 2019, May 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Barcham, M. 2021. “Towards a Radically Inclusive Design – Indigenous Story-Telling as Codesign Methodology.” CoDesign 19 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.1982989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellini, R., A. Strohmayer, P. Olivier, and C. Crivellaro. 2019. “Mapping the Margins: Navigating the Ecologies of Domestic Violence Service Provision.” In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ’19: May 4–9, Glasgow, Scotland, 122. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, T., G. De Michelis, P. Ehn, G. Jacucci, P. Linde, and I. Wagner. 2011. Design Things. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Branco, R. M., J. Quental, and Ó. Ribeiro. 2017. “Personalised Participation: An Approach to Involve People with Dementia and Their Families in a Participatory Design Project.” CoDesign 13 (2): 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1310903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratteteig, T., and E. Stolterman. 1997. “Design in Groups—And All That Jazz.” Computers and Design in Context 289–315.
   Google Scholar
• Bustamante Duarte, A. M., M. Ataei, A. Degbelo, N. Brendel, and C. Kray. 2021. “Safe Spaces in Participatory Design with Young Forced Migrants.” CoDesign 17 (2): 188–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1654523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buur, J., and H. Larsen. 2010. “The Quality of Conversations in Participatory Innovation.” CoDesign 6 (3): 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2010.533185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. E., J. Briggs, A. Armstrong, A. MacDonald, J. Vines, E. Flynn, and K. Salt. 2019. “Socio-Materiality of Trust: Co-Design with a Resource Limited Community Organisation.” CoDesign 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Gaudio, C., C. Franzato, and A. Jefferson de Oliveira. 2020. “Co-Design for Democratising and Its Risks for Democracy.” CoDesign 16 (3): 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1557693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Détienne, F., M. Baker, and J.-M. Burkhardt. 2012. “Quality of Collaboration in Design Meetings: Methodological Reflexions.” CoDesign 8 (4): 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.729063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devos, T., and M. Loopmans. 2021. “Stimulating Embodied Intersubjectivities: Two Participatory Experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium.” CoDesign 18 (3): 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindler, C., and O. S. Iversen. 2014. “Relational Expertise in Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers – PDC’14, 41–50. Windhoek, Namibia: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661452.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., A. Clement, and V. Pipek. 2013.“Communities – Participatory Design for, with and by communities. In Routledge Handbook of Participatory Design.” edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 28. 1st ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625508.
   Google Scholar
• Ehret, C., and T. Hollett. 2016. “Affective Dimensions of Participatory Design Research in Informal Learning Environments: Placemaking, Belonging, and Correspondence.” Cognition & Instruction 34 (3): 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1169815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, L. 2022. “Relational Sensitivity and Participatory Practice: Exploring Poise and Punctuation Through an Empirical Study.” In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 –Volume 2, 186–190. Newcastle upon Tyne: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3537797.3537872.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, L. 2023. “Relational Sensitivity in Participatory Design: Thinking and making together through joint inquiry.” PhD Thesis, Mälardalen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hakio, K., and T. Mattelmäki. 2019. “Future Skills of Design for Sustainability: An Awareness-Based Co-Creation Approach.” Sustainability 11 (19): 5247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halskov, K., and P. Dalsgaard. 2007. “The Emergence of Ideas: The Interplay Between Sources of Inspiration and Emerging Design Concepts.” CoDesign 3 (4): 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701607404.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D. K.-L., J. Ma, and Y. Lee. 2011. “Empathy @ Design Research: A Phenomenological Study on Young People Experiencing Participatory Design for Social Inclusion.” CoDesign 7 (2): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.609893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, O. S., K. Halskov, and T. W. Leong. 2012. “Values-Led Participatory Design.” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. 2019. “Towards Ethical Principles for Participatory Design Practice.” CoDesign 15 (4): 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1502324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, A. 2015. “Troubling Futures: Can Participatory Design Research Provide a Constitutive Anthropology for the 21st Century?” IxD&a 26 (26): 81–94. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-026-005.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A. 2019. “Design and Social Innovation at the Margins: Finding and Making Cultures of Plurality.” Design and Culture 11 (1): 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1567985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, A., and Y. Akama. 2012. “The Human Touch: Participatory Practice and the Role of Facilitation in Designing with Communities.” In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers: Volume 1 – PDC’12, 61. Roskilde, Denmark: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347645.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and Y. Akama. 2014. “Structuring Future Social Relations: The Politics of Care in Participatory Practice.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers – PDC’14, 151–160. Windhoek, Namibia: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661438.
   Google Scholar
• Malinverni, L., and N. Pares. 2016. “An Autoethnographic Approach to Guide Situated Ethical Decisions in Participatory Design with Teenagers.” Interacting with Computers. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosely, G., L. Markauskaite, and C. Wrigley. 2021. “Design Facilitation: A Critical Review of Conceptualisations and Constructs.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 42:100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosleh, W. S., and H. Larsen. 2021. “Exploring the Complexity of Participation.” CoDesign 17 (4): 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1789172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofman, D. 2013. Core Qualities and the Core Quadrant. The Hague: Core quality international.
   Google Scholar
• Petrella, V., J. Yee, and R. E. Clarke. 2020. Mutuality and Reciprocity: Foregrounding Relationships in Design and Social Innovation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Northumbria University. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2020.177.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, C., and K. Davis. 2017. “Designing Together?: Group Dynamics in Participatory Digital Badge Design with Teens.” In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 322–327. Stanford California: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079716.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez Galleguillos, M. L., A. Eloiriachi, and A. Coşkun. 2022. “Beneath Walls and Naked Souls: Factors Influencing Intercultural Meaningful Social Interactions in Public Places of Istanbul.” In Participatory Design Conference 2022: Volume 1, 194–205. Newcastle upon Tyne: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3536169.3537793.
   Google Scholar
• Redström, J. 2017. Making Design Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandman, H., T. Meguid, and J. Levänen. 2020. “Unboxing Empathy: Reflecting on Architectural Design for Maternal Health.” CoDesign 18 (2): 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1833935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, B. G. 2010. “A Cognitive Account of Collective Emergence in Design.” CoDesign 6 (4): 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2010.533184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen, J., and O. S. Jensen. 2016. “Contact Quality in Participation: A “Sensethic” Perspective.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference Aarhus, Denmark: ACM Press, 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948076.2948084.
   Google Scholar
• Spiel, K., E. Brulé, C. Frauenberger, G. Bailley, and G. Fitzpatrick. 2020. “In the Details: The Micro-Ethics of Negotiations and in-Situ Judgements in Participatory Design with Marginalised Children.” CoDesign 16 (1): 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1722174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiel, K., E. Brulé, C. Frauenberger, G. Bailly, and G. Fitzpatrick. 2018. “Micro-Ethics for Participatory Design with Marginalised Children.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference, Hasselt and Genk Belgium, 1–12. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210603.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M. 2013. “Virtues in Participatory Design: Cooperation, Curiosity, Creativity, Empowerment and Reflexivity.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3): 945–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9380-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St John, N., and Y. Akama. 2022. “Reimagining Co-Design on Country as a Relational and Transformational Practice.” CoDesign 18 (1): 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.2001536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taoka, Y., K. Kagohashi, and C. Mougenot. 2021. “A Cross-Cultural Study of Co-Design: The Impact of Power Distance on Group Dynamics in Japan.” CoDesign 17 (1): 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1546321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. L., A. S. Wujal Wujal Council, and M. Brereton. 2022. “Tangible ‘Design Non-Proposals’ for Relationship Building in Community-Based Co-Design Projects.” In Participatory Design Conference 2022: Volume 1, 63–74. Newcastle upon Tyne: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3536169.3537780.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenberg, J., D. Socha, and W.-M. Roth. 2016. “Seeing Design Stances.” CoDesign 12 (1–2): 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1127386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjahja, C., and J. Yee. 2022. “Being a Sociable Designer: Reimagining the Role of Designers in Social Innovation.” CoDesign 18 (1): 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.2021244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mechelen, M., M. Gielen, V. Vanden Abeele, A. Laenen, and B. Zaman. 2014. “Exploring Challenging Group Dynamics in Participatory Design with Children.” In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 269–272. Aarhus Denmark: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610469.
   Google Scholar
• Wilber, K. 2000. A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science and Spirituality. Boulder Colorado: Shambhala Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., and K. Morrissey. 2022. “Modalities of Participation: Designing Beyond the Verbal.” In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 – Volume 2, 63–69. Newcastle upon Tyne: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3537797.3537812.
   Google Scholar
• Zamenopoulos, T., B. Lam, K. Alexiou, M. Kelemen, S. De Sousa, and M. Phillips. 2021. “Types, Obstacles and Sources of Empowerment in Co-Design: The Role of Shared Material Objects and Processes.” CoDesign 17 (2): 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1605383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., D. Ji, and X. Chen. 2022. “Building Trust in Participatory Design to Promote Relational Network for Social Innovation.” In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 – Volume 2, 94–102. Newcastle upon Tyne: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3537797.3537817.
   Google Scholar