Collaborative critical making in higher education: a case study of a community-centred storytelling effort to transform harmful narratives of gun violence in Boston

References

• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2007. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcham, M. 2023. “Towards a Radically Inclusive Design – Indigenous Story-Telling As Codesign Methodology.” CoDesign 19 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.1982989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendiner-Viani, G. 2019. Contested City: Art and Public History As Mediation at New York’s Seward Park Urban Renewal Area. Ames, IA: University of Iowa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., C. Dindler, O. S. Iversen, and R. C. Smith. 2022. Participatory Design. New York: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., and M. Kyng. 2018. “Participatory Design That Matters—Facing the Big Issues.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25:1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, O. V. 2022. Making Trouble: Design and Material Activism. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Campanella, M., B. Kirshner, J. Mendy, M. Landa-Posas, K. Terrazas Hoover, S. Lopez, L.-E. Porras-Holguin, and M. Estrada Martin. 2022. “Co-Construction Knowledge for Action in Research Practice Partnerships.” Social Sciences 11 (3): 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11030140.
   Google Scholar
• Charney, D. 2011. Power of Making. London: V&A Publishing and Crafts Council. http://conceptlab.com/criticalmaking/PDFs/CriticalMaking2012Hertz-Manifestos-pp01to06-Charny-PowerOfMaking.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. 2020. Design Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. 2022. Design As Democratic Inquiry: Putting Experimental Civics into Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. 2014. Listening for Democracy: Recognition, Representation, Reconciliation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DuBois, W. E. B. 1957. The Education of Black People: Ten Critiques, 1906–1960. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence and Coalition to Stop Gun Violence. 2021. “A Public Health Crisis Decades in the Making: A Review of 2019 CDC Gun Mortality Data.” http://efsgv.org/2019CDCdata.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. W. 2024. The American Scholar: An Oration delivered before the Phi Beta Kappa Society, at Cambridge, August 31, 1837. Accessed March 13, 2024. https://emersoncentral.com/texts/nature-addresses-lectures/addresses/the-american-scholar/.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, K. 2019. Generous Thinking: A Radical Approach to Changing the University. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Friess, E. 2010. “The Sword of Data: Does Human-Centered Design Fulfill Its Rhetorical Responsibility?” Design Issues 26 (3): 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, A., and D. Tatar. 2020. “P for Political: Participation without Agency Is Not Enough.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2, 45–49. Manizales Colombia: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385142.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, E. M. 1941. “An Experiment in the Development of Critical Thinking.” Masters Thesis, New York: Columbia Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E., and G. Mugar. 2020. Meaningful Inefficiencies: Civic Design in an Age of Digital Expediency. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haber, J. 2020. Critical Thinking. MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hector, P., and A. Botero. 2022. “Generative Repair: Everyday Infrastructuring Between DIY Citizen Initiatives and Institutional Arrangements.” CoDesign 18 (4): 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.1912778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, G., and S. Levitsky. 2004. “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, G. 2012. “Critical Making.” self published. http://conceptlab.com/criticalmaking/PDFs/CriticalMaking2012Hertz-Introduction-pp01to10-Hertz-MakingCriticalMaking.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, G. 2023. Art + DIY. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., H. Benesch, and J. Geib. 2017. “Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalbert, K. 2016. “Building Knowledge Infrastructures for Empowerment: A Study of Grassroots Water Monitoring Networks in the Marcellus Shale.” Science and Technology Studies 29 (2): 26–43. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55740.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, N., and K. Jensen eds. 1991. A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karasti, H., and J. Blomberg. 2018. “Studying Infrastructuring Ethnographically.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 27 (2): 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9296-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korn, M., R. Wolfgang, R. Tobias, and S. David. 2019. “Infrastructuring Publics: A Research Perspective.” In Infrastructuring Publics, edited by M. Korn, W. Reißmann, T. Röhl, and D. Sittler, 11–47. Medien Der Kooperation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20725-0_2.
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Gun Deaths: 2019. 2019. “The Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence.” https://efsgv.org/state/massachusetts/.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, B., S. Doherty, P. Worthy, and J. Reid. 2023. “Design Thinking, Wicked Problems and Institutioning Change: A Case Study.” CoDesign 19 (3): 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2022.2034885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlebrook, J., and K. Maines. 2016. “The Introductory Architecture Studio Revisited: Exploring the Educational Potential of Design-Build within a Liberal Arts Context.” Journal of Architectural Education 70 (1): 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2016.1122494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. D. 2008. “Traditional Vs. Critical Service-Learning: Engaging the Literature to Differentiate Two Models.” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 14 (2): 50–65. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mjcsl/3239521.0014.2*?g=mjcslg;rgn=full+text;xc=1.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. D., D. M. Donahue, and C. Young-Law. 2012. “Service Learning As a Pedagogy of Whiteness.” Equity & Excellence in Education 45 (4): 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2012.715534.
   Google Scholar
• Morsy, L., and R. Rothstein. 2016. “Mass Incarceration and Children’s Outcomes: Criminal Justice Policy Is Education Policy.” Economic Policy Institute. December 15, 2016. https://www.epi.org/publication/mass-incarceration-and-childrens-outcomes/.
   Google Scholar
• Niewöhnr, J. 2015. “Infrastructures of Society.” In International Encylopedia of the Social and Behaviorial Sciences, edited by D. W. James, 119–125, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Pipek, V., and V. Wulf. 2009. “Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (5): 447–473. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratto, M. 2011. “Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life.” The Information Society 27 (4): 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salam, M., D. Nurfatimah Awang Iskandar, D. Hanani Abang Ibrahim, and M. Shoaib Farooq. 2019. “Service Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review.” Asia Pacific Education Review 20 (4): 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09580-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serpa, B., I. Portela, M. Costard, and S. Batista. 2020. “Political-Pedagogical Contributions to Participatory Design from Paulo Freire.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise -Traditional vs. Critical Service-Learning: Engaging the Literature to Differentiate Two Models Volume 2, 170–174. Manizales Colombia: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385149.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Z., J. R. Zubizarreta, M. Giuriato, K. A. Koh, and C. A. Sacks. 2023. “Firearm Injuries in Children and Adolescents: Health and Economic Consequences Among Survivors and Family Members.” Health Affairs 42 (11): 1541–1550. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and G. Bowker. 2002. “How to Infrastructure.” In Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs, edited by L. Lievrouw and S. Livingston, 151–162. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Still, B., and K. Crane. 2017. Fundamentals of User-Centered Design: A Practical Approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., and K. Thelen. 2005. Beyond Continuity Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Workbook: BPD Shots Fired Dashboard. 2022. Boston.gov. 2022. https://dashboard.boston.gov/t/Guest_Access_Enabled/views/ShotsFiredDashboard_16244869752910/ShotsFiredDashboard?%3Adisplay_count=n&%3Aembed=y&%3AisGuestRedirectFromVizportal=y&%3Aorigin=viz_share_link&%3AshowAppBanner=false&%3AshowVizHome=n.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2017. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar