Recovery and desistance: what the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending

References

• Alcoholics Anonymous. 1939. Alcoholics Anonymous (The Big Book). New York: Anonymous Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alcoholics Anonymous World Services. 2001. Alcoholics Anonymous: the story of how many thousands of men and women have recovered from alcoholism. 4th ed. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton M. 2007. The new abstentionists. Druglink, July/August.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett T, Holloway K. 2004. Drug use and offending: summary results of the first two years of the NEW-ADAM programme. The Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. London: Home Office. Findings 179.
   Google Scholar
• Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. 2007. What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. J Subst Abuse Treat. 33:221–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Laudet A. 2010. The potential of recovery capital. London: RSA.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Lubman I, Savic M, Wilson A, Dingle G, Alexander Haslam S, Jetten J. 2014. Social and transitional identity: exploring social networks and their significance in a therapeutic community setting. Therapeutic Communities. 35:10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Savic M. 2015. Substance abuse and offending: pathways to recovery. In: Sheehan R, Ogloff J, editors. Working within the forensic paradigm: cross-discipline approaches for policy and practice. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Beckwith M, Haslam C, Haslam A, Jetten J, Mawson E, Lubman D. 2016a. Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: The Social Identity Model of Recovery (SIMOR). Addict Res Theory. 24:111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Gow J, Knox T, Taylor A, Groshkova T, White W. 2012. Mapping the recovery stories of drinkers and drug users in Glasgow: quality of life and its associations with measures of recovery capital. Drug Alcohol Rev. 31:334–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Bamber S, Battersby A, Gilman M, Groshkova T, Honor S, White W. 2010. Recovery and straw men: An analysis of the objections raised to the transition to a recovery model in UK addiction services. J Groups Addict Recover. 5:264–288.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Day E, Homayoun S, Lenton H, Moverley R, Openshaw M. 2008. Treatment retention in the Drug Intervention Programme: do primary drug users fare better than primary offenders? Drugs: Educ Prev Policy. 15:201–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Beswick T, Hodgkins S, Idle M. 2016b. Recovery, ambitions and aspirations: an exploratory project to build a recovery community by generating a skilled recovery workforce. Alcohol Treat Q. 34:3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki P. 1986. Pathways from heroin addiction: recovery without treatment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms A, Shapland A, Costello A, Holmes D, Muir G. 2004. Towards desistance: theoretical underpinnings for an empirical study. Howard J. 43:368–389.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J. 1989. Crime, shame and reintegration. Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett R, Maruna S. 2006. The kindness of prisoners: strength-based resettlement in theory and in action. Criminology Criminal Justice. 6:83–106.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett R, McNeill F. 2005. The place of the officer–offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. Probation J. 52:247–268.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud W, Granfield R. 2001. Natural recovery from substance dependency: lessons for treatment providers. J Soc Work Pract Addict. 1:83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud W, Granfield R. 2009. Conceptualising recovery capital: expansion of a theoretical construct. Subst Use Misuse. 43:1971–1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colman C, Vander Laenen F. 2012. “Recovery Came First”: desistance versus recovery in the criminal careers of drug-using offenders. Sci World J; [cited 2015 Feb 29]. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2012/657671/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan P, Kurabawa S, O'Shaughnessy J. 2009. The public stigma of mental illness and drug addiction: findings from a stratified random sample. J Social Work. 9:139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan P. 1996. Recovery as a journey of the heart. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 19:91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon G. 2000. The therapeutic community: theory, model and method. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• De Maeyer J, Vanderplasschen W, Broekaert E. 2009. Exploratory study on drug users' perspectives on quality of life: more than health-related quality of life? Soc Indic Res. 90:107–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Maeyer J, Vandesplasschen W, Lammertyn J, van Nieuwehuizen C, Sabbe B, Broekaert E. 2011. Current quality of life and its determinants among opiate-dependent individuals five years after starting methadone treatment. Qual Life Res. 20:139–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingle GA, Stark C, Cruwys T, Best D. 2014. Breaking good: breaking ties with social groups may be good for recovery from substance misuse. Br J Soc Psychol. 54:236–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donati P. 2011. Relational sociology: a new paradigm for the social sciences. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Draine J, Wolff N, Jacoby JE, Hartwell S, Duclos C. 2006. Understanding community re‐entry of former prisoners with mental illness: a conceptual model to guide new research. Behav Sci Law. 23:689–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrall S. 2002. Rethinking what works with offenders: probation, social context and desistance from crime. Devon: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Farrall S, Calverley A. 2006. Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and justice series. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrall S, Hunter B, Sharpe G, Calverley A. 2014. Citizenship values and desistance from crime: exploring change over time. In: Criminal careers in transition: the social context of desistance from crime. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrall S, Maruna S. 2004. Desistance-focused criminal justice policy research: introduction to a special issue on desistance from crime and public policy. Howard J. 43:358–367.
   Google Scholar
• Frings D, Albery I. 2015. The social identity model of cessation maintenance: formulation and initial evidence. Addict Behav. 44:35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano PC, Cernkovich SA, Rudolph JL. 2002. Gender, crime and desistance: towards a theory of cognitive transformation. Am J Sociol. 107:990–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glueck S, Glueck E. 1950. Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D. 1998. NTORS at one year. The National Treatment Outcome Research Study: changes in substance use, health and criminal behaviour at one year after intake. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Marsden J, Stewart D. 2001. NTORS after five years: the national treatment outcome research study: changes in substance use, health and criminal behaviour during the five years after intake. London: National Addiction Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Gossop M, Trakada K, Stewart D, Witton J. 2005. Reductions in criminal convictions after addiction treatment: 5-year follow-up. Drug Alcohol Depend. 79:295–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granfield R, Cloud W. 1996. The elephant that no one sees: natural recovery among middle-class addicts. J Drug Issues. 26:45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshkova T, Best D, White W.. 2012. The assessment of recovery capital: properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug Alcohol Rev. 32:187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam C, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Bevins A, Ravenscroft S, Tonks J. 2010. The social treatment: benefits of group reminiscence and group activity for the cognitive performance and well-being of older adults in residential care. Psychol Aging. 25:157–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam SA. 2014. Making good theory practical: five lessons for an Applied Social Identity Approach to challenges of organizational, health, and clinical psychology. Br J Soc Psychol. 53:1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam SA, Stephen DR, Levine M. 2012. When other people are heaven, when other people are hell: how social identity determines the nature and impact of social support. p. 157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway K, Bennet T, Farrington D. 2005. The effectiveness of criminal justice and treatment programmes in reducing drug-related crime: a systematic review. Home Office Online Report. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. 2010. Drug Strategy 2010 Reducing Demand, Restricting Supply, Building Recovery: Supporting People to Live a Drug Free Life [Internet]; [cited 2015 May 25]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/118336/drug-strategy-2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys K, Lembke A. 2013. Recovery-oriented policy and care systems in the UK and USA. Drug Alcohol Rev. 33:12–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inter-Ministerial Group on Drugs. 2012. Putting Full Recovery First; [cited 2015 May 25]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/98010/recovery-roadmap.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Irving J. 2016. Alcoholics anonymous – sustaining behavioural change. In: Robinson A, Hamilton P, editors. Transforming identities: seeking successful lives. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam SA (Eds.). 2012. The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam SA, Dingle G, Jones JM. 2014. How groups affect our health and well-being: the path from theory to policy. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 8:103–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laub JH, Sampson RJ. 2003. Shared beginnings, divergent lives: delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laub JH, Sampson RJ. 2006. Shared beginnings, divergent lives. London, UK: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laub J, Sampson R, Sweeten G. 2011. Assessing Sampson and Laub's life-course theory of crime. In: Cullen FT, John W, Kristie B, editors. Taking stock: the status of criminological theory. vol. 1. New Brunswick, US: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. 2011. A conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 199:445–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBel T, Burnett R, Maruna S, Bushway S. 2008. The ‘chicken and egg’ of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. Eur J Criminol. 5:131–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemert EM. 1951. Social pathology. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lofland J. 1969. Deviance and identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW, Zywiak WH, O'Malley SS. 2010. Network support as a prognostic indicator of drinking outcomes: the COMBINE study'. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 71:837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh B. 2011. Narrating desistance: identity change and the 12-step script. Ir Probat J. 8:49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna S. 2012. Elements of successful desistance signalling. Criminol Public Policy. 11:73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna S, Le Bel TP, Naples M, Mitchell N. 2010. Looking-glass identity transformation: Pygmalion and Golem in the rehabilitation process. In: Veysey B, Christian J, Martinez DJ, editors. How offenders transform their lives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna S, Farrall S. 2004. Desistance from crime: a theoretical reformulation. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 43: 171–194.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna S, Lebel TP, Mitchell N, Naples M. 2004. Pygmalion in the reintegration process: desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychol Crime Law. 10:271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna S, LeBel TP. 2003. Welcome home? Examining the “Re-entry Court” concept from a strength based perspective. West Crim Rev. 4:91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna S. 2001. Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh J, McKeganey N. 2000. Identity and recovery from dependant drug use: the addict's perspective. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 8:47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurran M, Ward T. 2004. Motivating offenders to change in therapy: an organizing framework. Law Criminol Psychol. 9:295–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill F, Farrall S, Lightowler C, Maruna S. 2012. How and why people stop offending: discovering desistence. Institute for Research and Innovation in Social Services; [cited 2015 Mar 12]. Available from: http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/79860/1/79860.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill F. 2006. A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminol Crim Just. 6:39–62.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill F, Anderson K, Colvin S, Overy K, Sparks R, Tett L. 2011. Kunstprojecten en What Works; een stimulans voor desistance?’ (Trans. ‘Inspiring Desistance? Arts projects and ‘what works?’). Justitiele verkenningen. 37: 80–101; [cited 2013 Aug 29]. Available from: http://blogs.iriss.org.uk/discoveringdesistance/files/2011/09/McNeill-et-al.-2011-Inspiring-Desistance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill F, Maruna S. 2007. Giving up and giving back: desistance, generativity and social work with offenders. In: McIvor G, Raynor P. editors. Developments in social work with offenders. Research highlights in social work. vol. 48. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill F. 2014. Discovering desistance: three aspects of desistance? [cited 2015 Jul 31]. Available from: http://blogs.iriss.org.uk/discoveringdesistance/2014/05/23/three-aspects-of-desistance.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill F, Whyte B. 2007. Reducing reoffending: social work and community justice in Scotland. Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill F, Weaver B. 2010. Changing lives? Desistance research and offender management. Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research; [cited 2013 Aug 30]. Available from: http://www.sccjr.ac.uk/documents/Report%202010%2003%20-%20Changing%20Lives.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. 2010. Breaking the cycle: effective punishment, rehabilitation and sentencing of offenders; [cited 2015 Mar 29]. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120119200607/http:/www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/docs/breaking-the-cycle.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moos R. 2007. Theory-based processes that promote remission of substance use disorders. Clin Psychol Rev. 27:537–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale J, Nettleton S, Pickering L. 2011. What is the role of harm reduction when drug users say they want abstinence? Int J Drug Policy. 22:189–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyserman D, Fryberg SA, Yoder N. 2007. Identity-based motivation and health. J Pers Soc Psychol. 93:1011–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patternoster R, Bushway S. 2009. Desistance and the ‘feared self’: towards an identity theory of criminal desistance. J Crim Law Criminol. 99:1103–1156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam RD. 2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Reith G, Dobbie F. 2012. Lost in the game: narratives of addiction and identity in recovery from problem gambling. Addict Res Theory. 20:511–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex S. 1999. Desistance from offending: experiences of Probation. How J Crim Justice. 38:366–383.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson G, Shapland J. 2008. Reducing recidivism a task for restorative justice?. Br J Criminol. 48:337–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe M, Clayton A, Benedict P, Bellamy C, Antunes K, Miller R, Pelletier J-F, Stern E, O'Connell M. 2012. Going to the source: creating a citizenship outcome measure by community-based participatory research methods. Psychiatr Serv. 63:445–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson RJ, Laub JH. 1992. Crime and deviance in the life course. Ann Rev Sociol. 18:63–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson RJ, Laub JH. 2003. Life‐course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70*. Criminology. 41:555–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2008. The Road to Recovery; [cited 2015 May 26]. Available from: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/attachements.cfm/att_53209_EN_Scotland%20Strategy%202008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon T. 2000. Explaining the drug–crime link: theoretical, policy and research issues. J Soc Policy. 29:95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapland J, Bottoms A. 2011. Reflections on social values, offending and desistance among young adult recidivists. Punishment Soc. 13:256–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shover N. 1996. Great pretenders: pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith AR. 2007. The social world of alcoholics anonymous. Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2014. Recovery and recovery support [Internet]; [cited 2014 Oct 31]. Available from: http://www.samhsa.gov/recovery.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel, S. editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. p. 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Drug Policy Commission. 2008. Reducing drug use, reducing offending: are programmes for problem drug-using offenders in the UK supported by the evidence?. London, England: United Kingdom Drug Policy Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan B. 2007. The internal narrative of desistance. Br J Criminol. 47:390–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward T, Maruna S. 2007. Rehabilitation: beyond the risk paradigm. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver B, McNeill F. 2010. Travelling hopefully: desistance research and probation practice. In: Brayford J, Cowe F, Deering J, editors. What else works? Creative work with offenders. Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver B. 2012. The relational context of desistance: some implications and opportunities for social policy. Social Policy Admin. 46:395–412.
   Google Scholar
• White W. 2008a. Recovery management and recovery-oriented systems of care: scientific rationale and promising practices. Chicago, IL: Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center and Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation Services.
   Google Scholar
• White WL. 2008b. Recovery: old wine, flavor of the month or new organizing paradigm? Subst Use Misuse. 43:1987–2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White W. 2009. Peer-based addiction recovery support: history, theory, practice, and scientific evaluation. Chicago, IL: Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center and Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation Services.
   Google Scholar
• Wilton R, DeVerteuil G. 2006. Spaces of sobriety/sites of power: examining social model alcohol recovery programs as therapeutic landscapes. Soc Sci Med. 63:649–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winick C. 1962. Maturing out of narcotic addiction. Bull Narcotics. 14: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. 2001. The World Health Report. Mental Health: new understandings, new hope. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Zywiak W, Neighbors C, Martin R, Johnson J, Eaton C, Rosenhow D. 2009. The important people drug and alcohol interview: psychometric properties, predictive validity and implications for treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 36:321–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar