Attentional bias variability and cued attentional bias for alcohol stimuli

References

• Badura-Brack AS, Naim R, Ryan TJ, Levy O, Abend R, Khanna MM, McDermott TJ, Pine DS, Bar-Haim Y. 2015. Effect of attention training on attention bias variability and PTSD symptoms: randomized controlled trials in Israeli and U.S. combat veterans. Am J Psychiatry. 172:1233–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh JA. 1994. The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, intention, efficiency and control in social cognition. In: Wyer R, Srull T, editors. Handbook of social cognition. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. p. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh JA, Ferguson MJ. 2000. Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychol Bull. 126:925–945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley KA, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ, Williams EC, Frank D, Kivlahan DR. 2007. AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 31:1208–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. 1998. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory care quality improvement project (ACQUIP). Alcohol use disorders identification test. Arch Intern Med. 158:1789–1795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen P, Mansfield R, Duckworth J, Field M, Jones A. 2015. Internal reliability of the alcohol-related visual probe task is increased by utilising personalised stimuli and eye-tracking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 155:170–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisler JM, Koster EHW. 2010. Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: an integrative review. Clin Psychol Rev. 30:203–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dear BF, Sharpe L, Nicholas MK, Refshauge K. 2011. The psychometric properties of the dot-probe paradigm when used in pain-related attentional bias research. J Pain. 12:1247–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Uyl TE, Gladwin TE, Wiers RW. 2014. Transcranial direct current stimulation, implicit alcohol associations and craving. Biol Psychol. 105:37–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Cox WM. 2008. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 97:1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Duka T. 2002. Cues paired with a low dose of alcohol acquire conditioned incentive properties in social drinkers. Psychopharmacology. 159:325–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field M, Mogg K, Zetteler J, Bradley BP. 2004. Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: the roles of initial orienting and maintained attention. Psychopharmacology. 176:88–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin TE, Figner B. 2014. “Hot” cognition and dual systems: introduction, criticisms, and ways forward. In: Wilhelms E, Reyna VF, editors. Frontiers of cognitive psychology series: neuroeconomics, judgment and decision making. New York: Psycholoy Press. pp. 157–180.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwin TE, Figner B, Crone EA, Wiers RW. 2011. Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 1:364–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin TE, Rinck M, Eberl C, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J, Wiers RW. 2015. Mediation of cognitive bias modification for alcohol addiction via stimulus-specific alcohol avoidance association. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 39:101–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin TE, Ter Mors-Schulte MHJ, Ridderinkhof KR, Wiers RW. 2013. Medial parietal cortex activation related to attention control involving alcohol cues. Front Psychiatry. 4:174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gladwin TE, Wiers CE, Wiers RW. 2016. Cognitive neuroscience of cognitive retraining for addiction medicine: from mediating mechanisms to questions of efficacy. Prog Brain Res. 224:323–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladwin TE, Wiers RW. 2011. How do alcohol cues affect working memory? Persistent slowing due to alcohol-related distracters in an alcohol version of the Sternberg task. Addict Res Theory. 20:284–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon AJ, Maisto SA, McNeil M, Kraemer KL, Conigliaro RL, Kelley ME, Conigliaro J. 2001. Three questions can detect hazardous drinkers. J Fam Pract. 50:313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gual A, Segura L, Contel M, Heather N, Colom J. 2002. Audit-3 and audit-4: effectiveness of two short forms of the alcohol use disorders identification test. Alcoholism. 37:591–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann W, Friese M, Strack F. 2009. Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci. 4:162–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hogarth L, Dickinson A, Duka T. 2005. Explicit knowledge of stimulus-outcome contingencies and stimulus control of selective attention and instrumental action in human smoking behaviour. Psychopharmacology. 177:428–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth L, Dickinson A, Hutton SB, Elbers N, Duka T. 2006. Drug expectancy is necessary for stimulus control of human attention, instrumental drug-seeking behaviour and subjective pleasure. Psychopharmacology. 185:495–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben K, Rothermund K, Wiers RW. 2009. Predicting alcohol use with a recoding-free variant of the implicit association test. Addict Behav. 34:487–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben K, Wiers RW. 2006. A test of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the alcohol-IAT. Exp Psychol. 53:292–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacoviello BM, Wu G, Abend R, Murrough JW, Feder A, Fruchter E, Levinstein Y, Wald I, Bailey CR, Pine DS et al. 2014. Attention bias variability and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress. 27:232–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster EHW, Crombez G, Verschuere B, De Houwer J. 2004. Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. Behav Res Ther. 42:1183–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pelley ME, Vadillo M, Luque D. 2013. Learned predictiveness influences rapid attentional capture: Evidence from the dot probe task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 39:1888–1900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogg K, Bradley BP. 1999. Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness. Cogn Emot. 13:713–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogg K, Field M, Bradley BP. 2005. Attentional and approach biases for smoking cues in smokers: an investigation of competing theoretical views of addiction. Psychopharmacology. 180:333–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naim R, Abend R, Wald I, Eldar S, Levi O, Fruchter E, Ginat K, Halpern P, Sipos ML, Adler AB, et al. 2015. Threat-related attention bias variability and posttraumatic stress. Am J Psychiatry. 172:1242–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noël X, Colmant M, Van Der Linden M, Bechara A, Bullens Q, Hanak C, Verbanck P. 2006. Time course of attention for alcohol cues in abstinent alcoholic patients: the role of initial orienting. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 30:1871–1877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notebaert L, Crombez G, Van Damme S, De Houwer J, Theeuwes J. 2011. Signals of threat do not capture, but prioritize, attention: a conditioning approach. Emotion. 11:81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ode S, Robinson MD, Hanson DM. 2011. Cognitive-emotional dysfunction among noisy minds: predictions from individual differences in reaction time variability. Cogn Emot. 25:307–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider W, Chein JM. 2003. Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cogn Sci. 27:525–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenmakers TM, de Bruin M, Lux IFM, Goertz AG, Van Kerkhof DHAT, Wiers RW. 2010. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 109:30–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin RM, Schneider W. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol Rev. 84:127–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townshend JM, Duka T. 2001. Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology. 157:67–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townshend JM, Duka T. 2007. Avoidance of alcohol-related stimuli in alcohol-dependent inpatients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 31:1349–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Damme S, Crombez G, Notebaert L. 2008. Attentional bias to threat: a perceptual accuracy approach. Emotion. 8:820–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollstädt-Klein S, Loeber S, von der Goltz C, Mann K, Kiefer F. 2009. Avoidance of alcohol-related stimuli increases during the early stage of abstinence in alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol Alcoholism. 44:458–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van Den Wildenberg E, Thush C, Engels RC, Sher KJ, Grenard J, Ames SL, Stacy AW. 2007. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 86:263–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar