Authentic advice for authentic problems? Legal information in Australian classroom drug education

References

• Amonini C, Donovan R. 2006. The relationship between youth’s moral and legal perceptions of alcohol, tobacco and marijuana and use of these substances. Health Educ Res. 21:276–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi C. 2009. Analysing policy: What is the problem represented to be? Sydney: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi C. 2015. Problematizations in alcohol policy: WHO’s ‘alcohol problems’. Contemp Drug Probl. 42:130–147.
   Google Scholar
• Barratt M, Lenton S, Allen M. 2013. Internet content regulation, public drug websites and growth in hidden Internet services. Drugs. 20:195–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck J. 1998. 100 Years of just say no versus "just say know. Reevaluating drug education goals for the coming century. Eval Rev. 22:15–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessant J. 2008. Hard wired for risk: neurological science, ‘the adolescent brain’ and developmental theory. J Youth Stud. 11:347–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessant J, Watts R. 2012. The mismeasurement of youth: why adolescent brain science is bad science. Contemp Social Sci. 7:181–196.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman S. 2004. ‘Chilling Out’: The cultural politics of substance consumption, youth and drug policy. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgois P. 2003. Crack and the political economy of social suffering. Addict Res Theory. 11:31–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brochu S, Duff C, Asbridge M, Erickson P. 2011. ‘There’s what’s on paper and then there’s what happens, out on the sidewalk’: Cannabis users’ knowledge and opinion of Canadian drug laws. J Drug Issues. 41:95–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Training. 2001. Cannabis: Know the risks! Drug education Unit: Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education Science & Training. 2003. Cannabis and Consequences. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2014. Drugs & The Law: What you need to know. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre. University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Farrugia A. 2014. Assembling the dominant accounts of youth drug use in Australian harm reduction drug education. Int J Drug Policy. 25:663–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrugia A. 2016. Assembling realities, assembling capacities: Young people and drug consumption in Australian drug education. PhD thesis, Curtin University, Perth. Available online: https://espace.curtin.edu.au/handle/20.500.11937/51622 (accessed May 31, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Farrugia A. 2017. Gender, reputation and regret: The ontological politics of Australian drug education. Gend Educ. 29:281–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrugia, A, Fraser, S. 2017a. Science and scepticism: Drug information, young men and counterpublic health. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1363459315628042 (accessed June 22, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Farrugia A, Fraser S. 2017b. Young brains at risk: Co-constituting youth and addiction in neuroscience-informed Australian drug education. BioSocieties. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41292-017-0047-2 (accessed June 21, 2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser S. 2004. ‘It’s your life!’: Injecting drug users, individual responsibility and hepatitis c prevention. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine. 8:199–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser S, Moore D. 2011. Governing through problems: the formulation of policy on amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) in Australia. Int J Drug Policy. 22:498–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz M, MacKinnon D, Williams J, Goldberg L, Moe E, Elliot D. 2005. Analysis of baseline treatment interactions in a drug prevention and health promotion program for high school male athletes. Addict Behav. 30:1001–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Western Australia. 2009. Choices: Alcohol and other drugs. School Drug Education and Road Aware. Government of Western Australia: East Perth.
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski D, Ramussen K. 2014. Authenticity in health education for adolescents: A qualitative study of hour health courses. Health Educ. 114:86–100.
   Google Scholar
• Grigg J, Lenton S, Scott J, Barratt M. 2015. Social supply of cannabis in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Heale P, Hawks D, Lenton S. 2000. Public awareness, knowledge and attitudes regarding the CEN system in South Australia. Drug Alcohol Revs. 19:271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes C, Ritter A, Cowdery C, Sindicich N. 2014. ‘Trafficking’ or ‘personal use’: do people who regularly inject drugs understand Australian drug trafficking laws? Drug Alcohol Rev. 33:658–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton F. 2012. Harm reduction, students and pleasure: an examination of student responses to a binge drinking campaign. Int J Drug Policy. 23:229–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Committee on Drugs (IGCD). 2015. National Drug Strategy 2016–2025 Draft: For Public Consultation. Canberra: Intergovernmental Committee on Drugs, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson P. 2008. Explaining small effects of information-based drug prevention: the importance of considering preintervention levels in risk perceptions. J Alcohol Drug Educ. 52:9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Korf D. 2002. Dutch coffee shops and trends in Cannabis use. Addict Behav. 27:851–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster K. 2014. Social construction and the evidence-based drug policy endeavour. Int J Drug Policy. 25:940–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster K, Ritter A. 2014. Examining the construction and representation of drugs as a policy problem in Australia’s National Drug Strategy documents 1985-2010. Int J Drug Policy. 25:81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster K, Duke K, Ritter A. 2015. Producing the ‘problem of drugs’: A cross national-comparison of ‘recovery’ discourse in two Australian and British reports. Int J Drug Policy. 26:617–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster K, Ritter A, Matthew-Simmons F. 2013. Young people’s opinions on alcohol and other drug issues. Drug Policy Modelling Program. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre. University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Leahy D. 2014. Assembling a health[y] subject: risky and shameful pedagogies in health education. Crit Public Health. 24:171–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy D, Malins P. 2015. Biopedagogical assemblages: Exploring school drug education in action. Cult Stud Crit Methodol. 15:398–406.
   Google Scholar
• Lenton S, Chanteloup F, Fetherston J, Sutton A, Hawks DV, Barratt MJ, Farringdon F. 2005. An evaluation of the impact of changes to cannabis law in WA – Summary of the Year 1 findings. National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund, Monograph No. 12. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Lesko N. 2001. Act your age! A cultural construction of adolescence. New York: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Loutzenheiser L. 2015. ‘Who are you calling a problem?’: Addressing transphobia and homophobia through school policy. Crit Stud Educ. 56:99–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midford R. 2007. Is Australia 'fair dinkum' about drug education in schools? Drug Alcohol Rev. 26:421–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore D. 2010. Beyond disorder, danger, incompetence and ignorance: Rethinking the youthful subject of alcohol and other drug policy. Contemp Drug Probl. 37:475–498.
   Google Scholar
• Moore D, Fraser S. 2006. Putting at risk what we know: reflecting on the drug-using subject in harm reduction and its political implications. Soc Sci Med. 62:3035–3047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre. (2014. Cannabis and Consequences II. Sydney: National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre, University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Department of Education. 2001. Cannabis: Know the Risks! Sydney: Drug Education Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson T, Duncan D, White J, Stickle F. 2013. Focusing on abuse, not use, in drug education. J Subst Use. 18:431–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker H, Williams L, Aldridge J. 2002. The normalization of sensible recreational drug use: more evidence from the North West England longitudinal study. Sociology. 36:941–964.
   Google Scholar
• Petraglia J. 2009. The importance of being authentic: persuasion, narration, and dialogue in health communication and education. Health Commun. 24:176–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes T. 2002. The ‘risk environment’: A framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. Int J Drug Policy. 31:85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Romer D, Hennessy M. 2007. A biosocial-affect model of adolescent sensation seeking: the role of affect evaluation and peer-group influence in adolescent drug use. Prev Sci. 8:89–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seear K, Fraser S. 2014. The addict as victim: producing the ‘problem’ of addiction in Australian victims of crime compensation. Int J Drug Policy. 25:826–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens L, Hunter L, Pendergast D, Carrington V, Bahr N, Kapitzke C, Mitchell J. 2007. ReConceptualising the Possible Narratives of Adolescence. Aust Educ Res. 34:107–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes T, Moore D. 2001. On the qualitative in drugs research: Part one. Addict Res Theory. 9:279–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter A, Cameron J. 2006. A review of the efficacy and effectiveness of harm reduction strategies for alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs. Drug Alcohol Rev. 25:611–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seear K, Farrugia A, Fraser S. (in preparation) Compliance, ambivalence, resistance: Young men’s perceptions of drug prohibition in Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan J, Butler R. 2010. ‘They’re legal so they’re safe, right?’ What did the legal status of BZP-party pills mean to young people in New Zealand? Int J Drug Policy. 21:77–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey M. 2016. The teacher ‘problem’: an analysis of the NSW education policy Great Teaching, Inspired Learning. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Published early online February 07, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson C. 2012. Cannabis use: What’s law got to do with it? Perceptions and knowledge of cannabis policy from the user perspective in Northern Ireland. Drugs. 19:129–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tupper K. 2008. Teaching teachers to just say ‘know’: Reflections on drug education. Teach Teach Educ. 24:356–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter R, Fraser S, Booker N, Treloar C. 2013. Authenticity and diversity: Enhancing Australian hepatitis C prevention messages. Contemp Drug Probl. 40:505–529.
   Google Scholar
• Wyn J, White R. 1997. Rethinking youth. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar