159
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Time perspective and substance use: an examination across three adolescent samples

, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 112-118 | Received 08 Sep 2020, Accepted 23 Jun 2021, Published online: 15 Jul 2021

References

  • Andretta JR, Worrell FC, Mello ZR. 2014. Predicting educational outcomes and psychological well-being in adolescents using time attitude profiles. Psychol Schs. 51(5):434–451.
  • Chavarria J, Allan NP, Moltisanti A, Taylor J. 2015. The effects of present hedonistic time perspective and past negative time perspective on substance use consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 152:39–46.
  • Cottle TJ. 1967. The circles test: an investigation of perceptions of temporal relatedness and dominance. J Proj Tech Pers Assess. 31(5):58–71.
  • Daugherty JR, Brase GL. 2010. Taking time to be healthy: predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Person Individ Differ. 48(2):202–207.
  • Fieulaine N, Martinez F. 2010. Time under control: time perspective and desire for control in substance use. Addict Behav. 35(8):799–802.
  • Griva F, Tseferidi S-I, Anagnostopoulos F. 2015. Time to get healthy: associations of time perspective with perceived health status and health behaviors. Psychol Health Med. 20(1):25–33.
  • Henson JM, Carey MP, Carey KB, Maisto SA. 2006. Associations among health behaviors and time perspective in young adults: model testing with boot-strapping replication. J Behav Med. 29(2):127–137.
  • Laghi F, Liga F, Baumgartner E, Baiocco R. 2012. Time perspective and psychosocial positive functioning among Italian adolescents who binge eat and drink. J Adolesc. 35(5):1277–1284.
  • Levy B, Earleywine M. 2004. Discriminating reinforcement expectancies for studying from future time perspective in the prediction of drinking problems. Addict Behav. 29(1):181–190.
  • Linden AN, Lau-Barraco C, Hollis BF. 2014. Associations between psychological distress and alcohol outcomes as mediated by time perspective orientation among college students. Ment Health Subst Use. 7(2):134–143.
  • Marko KW, Savickas ML. 1998. Effectiveness of a career time perspective intervention. J Vocat Behav. 52(1):106–119.
  • McKay MT, Andretta JR, Magee J, Worrell FC. 2014. What do temporal profiles tell us about adolescent alcohol use? Results from a large sample in the United Kingdom. J Adolesc. 37(8):1319–1328.
  • McKay M, Healy C, O'Donnell L. 2020. The Adolescent and Adult Time Inventory-time attitudes scale: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of psychometric studies. J Person Assess.
  • McKay MT, Morgan GB, Wells KE, Worrell FC, Cole JC, Andretta JR. 2019. The influence of time attitudes on adolescent alcohol use behaviours: a 33-month prospective study in the United Kingdom. Addict Res Theory. 27(3):189–197.
  • McKay MT, Percy A, Cole JC. 2013. Present orientation, future orientation and alcohol use in Northern Irish adolescents. Addict Res Theory. 21(1):43–51.
  • McKay MT, Perry JL, Cole JC, Worrell FC. 2018. What time is it? Temporal psychology measures relate differently to alcohol-related health outcomes. Addict Res Theory. 26(1):20–27.
  • Mello ZR. 2019. A construct matures: time perspective's multidimensional, developmental, and modifiable qualities. Res Hum Dev. 16(2):93–101.
  • Mello ZR, Finan LJ, Worrell FC. 2013. Introducing an instrument to assess time orientation and time relation in adolescents. J Adolesc. 36(3):551–563.
  • Mello ZR, Walker EB, Finan LJ, Stiasny A, Wiggers ICS, McBroom KA, Worrell FC. 2018. Time perspective, psychological outcomes, and risky behavior among runaway adolescents. Appl Dev Sci. 22(3):233–243.
  • Mello ZR, Worrell FC. 2010. The adolescent and adult time inventory: preliminary technical manual. Colorado Springs, CO & Berkeley, CA.
  • Mello ZR, Worrell FC. 2015. The past, the present, and the future: A conceptual model of time perspective in adolescence. In: Stolarski M, van Beek W, Fieulaine N, editors. Time perspective theory: review, research and application. Essays in honor of Philip Zimbardo. Springer International Publishing.
  • Miech RA, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, Patrick ME. 2019. Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2018: volume I, secondary school students. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
  • Nurmi J-E. 1991. How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Dev Rev. 11(1):1–59.
  • Oyserman D, Markus HR. 1990. Possible selves and delinquency. J Pers Soc Psychol. 59(1):112–125.
  • Smart RG. 1968. Future time perspectives in alcoholics and social drinkers. J Abnorm Psychol. 73(1):81–83.
  • Stolarski M, Wiberg B, Osin E. 2015. Assessing temporal harmony: the issue of a balanced time perspective. In: Stolarski M, Fieulaine N, van Beek W, editors. Time perspective theory; review, research and application: essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo. New York: Springer International Publishing; p. 57–71.
  • Stolarski M, Zajenkowski M, Jankowski KS, Szymaniak K. 2020. Deviation from the balanced time perspective: a systematic review of empirical relationships with psychological variables. Person Individ Differ. 156:109772.
  • Warner RM. 2007. Applied statistics: from bivariate through multivariate techniques. 1st ed. London: Sage Publications.
  • Wills TA, Sandy JM, Yaeger AM. 2001. Time perspective and early-onset substance use: a model based on stress-coping theory. Psychol Addict Behav. 15(2):118–125.
  • Worrell FC, Mello ZR. 2009. Convergent and discriminant validity of time attitude scores on the adolescent time perspective inventory. Res Child Adolesc Dev/Diskur Kindheits Jugendforschung. 4:185–196.
  • Worrell FC, Mello ZR, Buhl M. 2013. Introducing English and German versions of the Adolescent Time Attitude Scale. Assessment. 20(4):496–510.
  • Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. 1999. Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J Person Soc Psychol. 77(6):1271–1288.
  • Zimbardo PG, Keough KA, Boyd JN. 1997. Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Person Individ Differ. 23(6):1007–1023.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.