Understanding recovery Capital in relation to categorical 12-Step involvement and abstinence social support

References

• Alcoholics Anonymous. 2001. How it works. In: Alcoholics anonymous: The big book (4th ed.). New York (NY): Alcoholics Anonymous World Services; p. 59.
   Google Scholar
• Best D, Higham D, Pickersgill G, Higham K, Hancock R, Critchlow T. 2021. Building recovery capital through community engagement: a hub and spoke model for peer-based recovery support services in England. Alcohol Treat Quart. 39(1):3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best D, Vanderplasschen W, Nisic M. 2020. Measuring capital in active addiction and recovery: the development of the strengths and barriers recovery scale (SABRS). Subst Abuse Treat Prevent Policy. 15:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen EA, Scott CF, Irish A, Nochajski T H. 2020. Psychometric properties of the assessment of recovery capital (ARC) instrument in a diverse low-income sample. Subst Use Misuse. 55:108–118.
   Google Scholar
• Cale EL, Deane FP, Kelly PJ, Lyons GC. 2015. Psychometric properties of the Recovery Assessment Scale in a sample with substance use disorder. Addict Res Theory. 23(1):71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano I, Best D, Edwards M, Lehman J. 2017. Recovery capital pathways: modelling the components of recovery wellbeing. Drug Alcohol Depend. 181:11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford PR, Longabaugh R, Beattie M. 1992. Social support and patient drinking: a validation study. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res. 16:403.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford PR, Longabaugh R. 1991. Manual for the administration of the Important People and Activities instrument: Project Match [Unpublished manual]. Providence (RI): Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud W, Granfield R. 2008. Conceptualizing recovery capital: expansion of a theoretical construct. Subst Use Misuse. 43(12–13):1971–1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello MJ, Li Y, Remers S, MacKillop J, Sousa S, Ropp C, Rush B. 2019. Effects of 12-step mutual support and professional outpatient services on short-term substance use outcomes among adults who received inpatient treatment. Addict Behav. 98:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein EE, McCrady BS, Hallgren KA, Cook S, Jensen NK, Hildebrandt T. 2018. A randomized trial of female-specific cognitive behavior therapy for alcohol dependent women. Psychol Addict Behav. 32(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granfield R, Cloud W. 2001. Social context and “natural recovery”: the role of social capital in the resolution of drug-associated problems. Subst Use Misuse. 36(11):1543–1570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groh D, Jason LA, Ferrari J, Halpert J. 2011. A longitudinal investigation of the predictability of the three-factor model of the Important People Inventory. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 37(4):259–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshkova T, Best D, White W. 2013. The assessment of recovery capital: properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug Alcohol Rev. 32(2):187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueta K, Addad M. 2015. A house of cards: the long-term recovery experience of former drug-dependent Israeli women. Women Stud Int Forum. 48:18–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy EA. 2017. Recovery capital: a systematic review of the literature. Addict Res Theory. 25(5):349–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys K, Barreto NB, Carroll KM, Crits-Christoph P, Donovan D, Kelly J, Wagner TH. 2020. Impact of 12 step mutual help groups on drug use disorder patients across six clinical trials. Drug Alcohol Depend. 215:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys K, Kaskutas LA, Weisner C. 1998. The Alcoholics Anonymous Affiliation Scale: development, reliability, and norms for diverse treated and untreated populations. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 22(5):974–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jason LA, Guerrero M, Salomon-Amend M, Stevens E, Light JM, Stoolmiller M. 2021. Context matters: home-level but not individual-level recovery social capital predicts residents’ relapse. Am J Community Psychol. 67(3–4):392–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jason LA, Stevens EB, Doogan NJ, Light JN. 2020. An empirically-based theory of the relationships among social embeddedness, economic viability, learned recovery skills and perceived quality of Life in Recovery Homes. Alcohol Treat Q. 38(1):126–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaskutas LA, Bond J, Humphreys K. 2002. Social networks as mediators of the effect of Alcoholics Anonymous. Addiction. 97(7):891–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudet AB, White WL. 2008. Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction, and stress among former poly-substance users. Subst Use Misuse. 43(1):27–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majer JM, Droege JR, Jason LA. 2010. A categorical assessment of twelve-step involvement in relation to recovery resources. J Groups Addict Recover. 5(2):155–167.
   Google Scholar
• Majer JM, Droege JR, Jason LA. 2012. Coping strategies in recovery: more evidence for categorical twelve-step involvement. J Groups Addict Recover. 7(1):3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Majer JM, Jason LA, Aase DM, Droege JR, Ferrari JR. 2013. Categorical 12-step involvement and continuous abstinence at 2 years. J Subst Abuse Treat. 44(1):46–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majer JM, Jason LA, Ferrari JR, Miller SA. 2011. 12-Step involvement among a U.S. national sample of Oxford House residents. J Subst Abuse Treat. 41(1):37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghanibashi-Mansourieh A, Alipour F, Rafiey H, Arshi M. 2020. The role of reflective capital for the recovering substance abuser population of Tehran city. J Ethnic Subst Abuse. 2020:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery HA, Miller WR, Tonigan JS. 1995. Does Alcoholics Anonymous involvement predict treatment outcome? J Subst Abuse Treat. 12(4):241–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos R. 2007. Theory-based active ingredients of effective treatments for substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 88(2–3):109–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos RH, Moos BS. 2004. Long-term influence of duration and frequency of participation in alcoholics anonymous on individuals with alcohol use disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 72(1):81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narcotics Anonymous. 2008. What can i do? In Narcotics anonymous: basic text (6th ed.). Van Nuys (CA): World Service Office; p. 54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Porcaro A, Nguyen R, Salomon-Amend M, Chaparro J, Jason LA. 2021. Developing a latent coping resources factor for recovery from substance use disorders. Addict Res Theory. 29(3):239–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rynes KN, Tonigan JS. 2012. Do social networks explain 12-step sponsorship effects? A prospective lagged mediation analysis. Psychol Addict Behav. 26(3):432–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAMHSA. 2012. SAMHSA’s working definition of recovery: 10 Guiding Principles of Recovery. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. https://store.samhsa.gov/system/files/pep12-recdef.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez J, Sahker E, Arndt S. 2020. The assessment of recovery capital (ARC) predicts substance abuse treatment completion. Addict Behav. 102:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sells D, Davidson L, Jewell C, Falzer P, Rowe M. 2006. The treatment relationship in peer-based and regular case management for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 57(8):1179–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafarodi RW, Milne AB. 2002. Decomposing global self-esteem. J Pers. 70(4):443–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timko C, DeBenedetti A, Billow R. 2006. Intensive referral to 12-step self-help groups and 6-month substance use disorder outcomes. Addiction. 101(5):678–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timko C, DeBenedetti A. 2007. A randomized controlled trial of intensive referral to 12-step self-help groups: one-year outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 90(2–3):270–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonigan JS, Pearson MR, Magill M, Hagler KJ. 2018. AA attendance and abstinence for dually diagnosed patients: a meta-analytic review. Addiction. 113(11):1970–1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss RD, Griffin ML, Gallop RJ, Najavits LM, Frank A, Crits-Christoph P, Thase ME, Blaine J, Gastfriend DR, Daley D, et al. 2005. The effect of 12-step self-help group attendance and participation on drug use outcomes among cocaine-dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 77(2):177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zywiak WH, Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW. 2002. Decomposing the relationships between pretreatment social network characteristics and alcohol treatment outcome. J Stud Alcohol. 63(1):114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zywiak WH, Neighbors CJ, Martin RA, Johnson JE, Eaton CA, Rohsenow DJ. 2009. The important people drug and alcohol interview: psychometric properties, predictive validity, and implications for treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 36(3):321–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar