International addiction researchers’ perspectives on the needs of persons with addictions, the use of neuroscientific research for prevention and treatment, and future foci in addictions research

References

• Barnett A, Hall W, Fry CL, Dilkes-Frayne E, Carter A. 2018. Drug and alcohol treatment providers’ views about the disease model of addiction and its impact on clinical practice: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Rev. 37(6):697–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett Anthony, Fry CL. 2015. The clinical impact of the brain disease model of alcohol and drug addiction: exploring the attitudes of community-based AOD clinicians in Australia. Neuroethics. 8(3):271–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell S, Carter A, Mathews R, Gartner C, Lucke J, Hall W. 2014. Views of addiction neuroscientists and clinicians on the clinical impact of a ‘brain disease model of addiction.’. Neuroethics. 7(1):19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson M. 2016. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open. 2:8–14.
   Google Scholar
• bepress 2019. Disciplines: digital commons three-tiered taxonomy of academic disciplines. Berkley (USA): Bepress. https://www.bepress.com/reference_guide_dc/disciplines/
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist J, Koski-Jännes A, Cunningham J. 2014. How should substance use problems be handled? Popular views in Sweden, Finland, and Canada. Drugs and Alcohol Today. 14(1):19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2013. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Clarivate Analytics 2020. InCites. Journal Citation Reports. https://jcr.clarivate.com/JCRLandingPageAction.action?Init=Yes&SrcApp=IC2LS&SID=H2-df99yIL4cJl6UwfMeLJ4aGhm4LxxfYKbxx-18x2dw2WrWm8OCrVTPTpUU0DGKQx3Dx3DfSGlX5b5cUHfUSkbx2BdEkmgx3Dx3D-qBgNuLRjcgZrPm66fhjx2Fmwx3Dx3D-h9tQNJ9Nv4eh45yLvkdX3gx3Dx3D.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. 2018. Designing and conducting mixed methods research (Third Edition). Los Angeles (CA): SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dackis C, O'Brien C. 2005. Neurobiology of addiction: treatment and public policy ramifications. Nat Neurosci. 8(11):1431–1436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingel MJ, Hicks AD, Robinson ME, Koenig BA. 2012. Integrating genetic studies of nicotine addiction into public health practice: stakeholder views on challenges, barriers and opportunities. Public Health Genom. 15(1):46–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingel MJ, Karkazis K, Koenig BA. 2012. Framing nicotine addiction as a ‘disease of the brain’: social and ethical consequences. Soc Sci Q. 92(5):1363–1388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar D, Kushner HI, Vrecko S. 2010. Drugs, addiction and society. BioSocieties. 5(1):2–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall W, Carter A, Forlini C. 2015a. The brain disease model of addiction: is it supported by the evidence and has it delivered on its promises? The Lancet. Psychiatry. 2(1):105–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall W, Carter A, Forlini C. 2015b. Brain disease model of addiction: misplaced priorities? The Lancet. Psychiatry. 2(10):867.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall W, Carter L, Morley KI. 2003. Addiction, neuroscience and ethics. Addiction. 98(7):867–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer R, Dingel MJ, Ostergren JE, Nowakowski KE, Koenig BA. 2012. The experience of addiction as told by the addicted: incorporating biological understandings into self-story. Cult Med Psychiatry. 36(4):712–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heather N, Best D, Kawalek A, Field M, Lewis M, Rotgers F, Wiers RW, Heim D. 2018. Challenging the brain disease model of addiction: European launch of the addiction theory network. Addict Res & Theory. 26(4):249–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilig M, MacKillop J, Martinez D, Rehm J, Leggio L, Vanderschuren LJMJ. 2021a. Addiction as a brain disease revised: why it still matters, and the need for consilience. Neuropsychopharmacology. 46(10):1715–1723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilig M, MacKillop J, Martinez D, Rehm J, Leggio L, Vanderschuren LJMJ. 2021b. Response to ‘Addiction is a social disease: just as tenable as calling it a brain disease. Neuropsychopharmacology:. 46(10):1713–1714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim D. 2014. Addiction: not just brain malfunction. Nature. 507(7490):40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman M, Egerer M, Stoneham J, Forberger S, Ochterbeck D, Rundle S. 2022. Addiction and the brain: knowledge, beliefs and ethical considerations from a social perspective. Springer Nature, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• International Society of Addiction Journal Editors 2020. ISAJE home. London (UK): ISAJE. https://www.isaje.net/.
   Google Scholar
• Jack Oller D, Kelly JF, Magidson JF, Wakeman SE. 2019. Asking how our patients understand addiction. Am JlMed. 132(3):269–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski-Jännes A, Hirschovits-Gerz T, Pennonen M. 2012. Population, professional, and client support for different models of managing addictive behaviors. Subst Use Misuse. 47(3):296–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz U. 2018. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung (4. Auflage). Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Pleasant A, Walt G. 2006. Describing the impact of health research: a research impact framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 6:134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshner AI. 1997. Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science. 278(5335):45–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring P. 2015. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (12., überarbeitete Auflage). Weinheim & Basel: Beltz Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meurk C, Fraser D, Weier M, Lucke J, Carter A, Hall W. 2016. Assessing the place of neurobiological explanations in accounts of a family member’s addiction. Drug Alcohol Rev. 35(4):461–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meurk C, Partridge B, Carter A, Hall W, Morphett K, Lucke J. 2014. Public attitudes in Australia towards the claim that addiction is a (brain) disease: is addiction a (brain) disease? Drug Alcohol Rev. 33(3):272–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morphett K, Carter A, Hall W, Gartner C. 2017. Framing tobacco dependence as a ‘brain disease’: implications for policy and practice. Nicotine Tob Res. 19(7):774–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morphett K, Carter A, Hall W, Lucke J, Partridge B, Gartner C. 2018. Do neurobiological understandings of smoking influence quitting self-efficacy or treatment intentions? Nicotine Tob Res. 20(7):827–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan A, Hall L, Raphael E. 2013. Peer review in a changing world: an international study measuring the attitudes of researchers. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 64(1):132–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). 2018. Membership roster NACDA (National Advisory Council on Dug Abuse). https://www.drugabuse.gov/about-nida/advisory-boards-groups/national-advisory-council-drug-abuse-nacda/council-roster.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse, (NIDA) 2020. Drugs, Brains, and Behavior: The Science of Addiction; Drugs and the Brain. National Institute on Drug Abuse. https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugs-brains-behavior-science-addiction/drugs-brain.
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2018. Membership roster PDMA (Pathophysiological Basis of Mental Disorders and Addictions Study Section Center For Scientific Review). Pathophysiological Basis of Mental Disorders and Addictions Study Section Center For Scientific Review (PDMA): Membership Roster. https://internet.csr.nih.gov/Rosters/MemberRoster.aspx?s=PMDA.
   Google Scholar
• Nature E. 2014. Animal farm. Nature. 506(7486):5–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale J, Miller P, West R. 2014. Reporting quantitative information in qualitative research: guidance for authors and reviewers. Addiction. 109(2):175–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peele S. 2016. People control their addictions: no matter how much the ‘chronic’ brain disease model of addiction indicates otherwise, we know that people can quit addictions - with special reference to harm reduction and mindfulness. Addict Behav Rep. 4:97–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pickard, H., & Ahmed, S. H. (Eds.) 2020. The Routledge handbook of philosophy and science of addiction (First issued in paperback). London (NY): Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes T, Coomber R. 2010. Qualitative methods and theory in addictions research. In P. G. Miller, J. Strang, & P. M. Miller (Eds.), Addiction research methods. (p. 59–78. Oxford (UK): Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Room R. 2021. No level has primacy in what is called addiction: ‘addiction is a social disease’ would be just as tenable. Neuropsychopharmacology 46(10):1712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale C. 1999. The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas DR. 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am JEval. 27(2):237–246.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson M, Rudan I, Saxena S, Swartz L, Tsai AC, Patel V. 2009. Setting priorities for global mental health research. Bull. World Health Organ. 87(6):438–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl GR, Koob GF, Cable J. 2019. The neurobiology of addiction. Ann N. Y Acad of Sciences. 1451(1):5–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkow ND, Boyle M. 2018. Neuroscience of addiction: relevance to prevention and treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 175(8):729–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkow ND, Koob G. 2015. Brain disease model of addiction: why is it so controversial? The Lancet. Psychiatry. 2(8):677–679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Volkow ND, Koob GF, McLellan AT. 2016. Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of Addiction. N Engl J Med. 374(4):363–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens TK, Walker LJ. 2015. The chronic disease concept of addiction: helpful or harmful? Addict Res Theory. 23(4):309–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar