The effects of age at implantation on speech intelligibility in pediatric cochlear implant users: Clinical outcomes and sensitive periods

References

• Davis J. Performance of young hearing-impaired children on a test of basic concepts. J Speech Hear Res. 1974; 17: 342–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geers AE, Kuehn G, Moog JS. EPIC: Experimental project in the instructional concentration: evaluation and results. Am Ann Deaf. 1981; 126: 929–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt H, McGarr N, Geffner D. Development of language and communication skills in hearing-impaired children: introduction. ASHA Monogr. 1987; 26: 1–8
   Google Scholar
• Moeller MP, Osberger MJ, Eccarius M. Language and learning skills of hearing-impaired students: receptive language skills. ASHA Monogr. 1986; 23: 41–53
   Google Scholar
• Osberger MJ, Moeller MP, Eccarius M, Robbins AM, Johnson D. Language and learning skills of hearing-impaired students: expressive language skills. ASHA Monogr. 1986; 23: 54–65
   Google Scholar
• Kent RD, Weismer G, Kent JF, Rosenbeck JC. Toward phonetic intelligibility testing of dysarthria. J Speech Hear Disord. 1989; 54: 482–99
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monsen RB. The oral speech intelligibility of hearing-impaired talkers. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983; 48: 286–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svirsky MA, Chin SB, Miyamoto RT, Sloan RB, Caldwell M. Speech intelligibility of profoundly deaf pediatric cochlear hearing aid users. Volta Rev. 2000; 102: 175–98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denes PB, Pinson EN. The Speech Chain: the physics and biology of spoken language2nd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York 1993; 1–2
   Google Scholar
• Smith CR. Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children. J Speech Hear Res. 1975; 18: 795–811
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monsen RB. Toward measuring how well hearing-impaired children can speak. J Speech Hear Res. 1978; 21: 197–219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markides A. The speech of deaf and partially-hearing children with special reference to factors affecting intelligibility. Br J Disord Commun. 1970; 5: 126–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John JEJ, Howarth JN. The effect of time distortions on the intelligibility of deaf children's speech. Lang Speech. 1965; 8: 127–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarr NS. The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. J Speech Hear Res. 1983; 26: 451–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudgins CV, Numbers FC. An investigation of the intelligibility of the speech of the deaf. Gen Psychol Monogr. 1942; 25: 289–392
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins CV. The development of communication skills among profoundly deaf children in an auditory training programme. Modern educational treatment of deafness, A Ewing. Manchester University Press, Manchester 1960
   Google Scholar
• Lynch JI, Fox DR. A Parent-Child Cleft Palate Curriculum: Developing Speech and Language. CC Publications;. p, Oregon 1980; 102
   Google Scholar
• Chin SB, Tsai PL, Gao S. Connected speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003; 12: 440–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Technical Report: Cochlear Implants. ASHA Suppl. 2004;24:1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison M, Roush J. Age of suspicion, identification, and intervention for infants and young children with hearing loss: a national survey. Ear Hear. 1996; 17: 55–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga-Itano C, Coulter D, Thomson V. Infant hearing impairment and universal hearing screening. J Perinatol. 2000; 20: S131–6
   Google Scholar
• Lennenberg E. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley; 1967. In: Newport EL Maturational constraints on language learning. Cogn Sci. 1990;14:11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Leiber J. Nature's experiments, society's closures. J Theory Soc Behav. 2002; 27: 325–43
   Google Scholar
• Ruben RJ. Unsolved issues around critical periods with emphasis on clinical application. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockholm) Suppl. 1986; 429: 61–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fryauf-Bertschy H, Tyler RS, Kelsay DMR, Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG. Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: the influences of age at implant and length of device use. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997; 40: 183–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT, Lento CL, Ying E, O'Neill T, Fears B. Effects of age at implantation in young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 189(Suppl)69–73
   Google Scholar
• Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT, Ying E, Perdew AE, Zuganelis H. Cochlear implantation in young children: effects of age at implantation and communication mode. Volta Rev. 2003; 102: 127–44
   Google Scholar
• Young NM. Infant cochlear implantation and anesthetic risk. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002; 111: 49–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiret L, Nivoche Y, Hatton F, Desmonts JM, Vourc'h G. Complications related to anesthesia in infants and children. A prospective survey of 40,240 anesthetics. Br J Anesth. 1998; 61: 263–9
   Google Scholar
• Keenan RL, Shapiro JH, Kane FR, Simpson PM. Bradycardia during anesthesia in infants. An epidemiologic study. Anesthesiology. 1994; 80: 976–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger MJ, Robbins AM, Todd SL, Riley AI, Miyamoto RT. Speech production skills in children with multichannel cochlear implants. Advances in cochlear implants, IJ Hochmair-Desoyer, ES Hochmair. Datenkonvertierung, Reproduktion und Druck, Manz, Vienna 1994; 503–8
   Google Scholar
• Miyamoto RT, Svirsky MA, Kirk KI, Robbins AM, Todd S, Riley AI. Speech intelligibility of children with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997; 106: 35–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky MA, Sloan RB, Caldwell M, Miyamoto RT. Speech intelligibility of prelingually deafened children with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000; 109: 123–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snik AFM, Vermuelen AM, Brokx JPL. Long-term speech perception in children with cochlear implants compared with children with conventional hearing aids. Am J Otol. 1997; 18: 129–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svirsky MA, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci. 2000; 11: 153–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RF, Svirsky MA. Communication outcomes as a function of age at cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf infants and children: is younger always better? Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, New Orleans, LA; February, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Peng SC, Spencer LJ, Tomblin JB. Speech intelligibility of pediatric cochlear implant recipients with seven years of device experience. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004; 47: 1227–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky MA, Teoh S, Neuburger H. Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol. 2004; 9: 224–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberger MJ, Robbins AM, Todd SL, Riley AI. Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants. Volta Rev. 1994; 96: 169–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsen RB (1983) . A usable test for the speech intelligibility of deaf talkers. Am Ann Deaf. 1981;126:845–52. In: Monsen RB The oral speech intelligibility of hearing-impaired talkers. J Speech Hear Disord. ;48:286–96.
   Google Scholar
• Tobey EA, Geers AE, Brenner C, Altuna D, Gabbert G. Factors associated with development of speech production skills in children implanted by age five years. Ear Hear Suppl. 2003; 24: S36–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JE, Newport E. Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Brain development and cognition, MJ Johnson. Blackwell, Oxford 1993; 248–82
   Google Scholar