2,076
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of implementation outcomes in an integrated mental healthcare trial in South Africa

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 1940761 | Received 12 Jul 2020, Accepted 04 Jun 2021, Published online: 17 Aug 2021

References

  • Vigo DV, Patel V, Becker A, et al. A partnership for transforming mental health globally. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6:350–12.
  • Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, et al. The Lancet commission on global mental health and sustainable development. Lancet. 2018;392:1553–1598.
  • Lund C, Tomlinson M, Patel V. Integration of mental health into primary care in low-and middle-income countries: the prime mental healthcare plans. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208:s1–s3.
  • Patel V, Chisholm D, Parikh R, et al. Addressing the burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet. 2016;387:1672–1685.
  • Valentijn P, Boesveld I, van der Klauw D, et al. Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study. Int J Integr Care. 2015;15.
  • England E, Lester H. Integrated mental health services in england: a policy paradox. Int J Integr Care. 2005;5:e24.
  • Petersen I, Janse van Rensburg A, Kigozi F, et al. Scaling up integrated primary mental health in six low-and-middle income countries: obstacles, synergies and implications for systems reform. Br J Psychiatry. 2019;5:e69.
  • Lund C, Tomlinson M, De Silva M, et al. Prime: a programme to reduce the treatment gap for mental disorders in five low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001359.
  • Petersen I, Bhana A, Fairall LR, et al. Evaluation of a collaborative care model for integrated primary care of common mental disorders comorbid with chronic conditions in south africa. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19:107.
  • Petersen I, Bhana A, Folb N, et al. Collaborative care for the detection and management of depression among adults with hypertension in south africa: study protocol for the prime-sa randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:192.
  • Selohilwe O, Bhana A, Garman EC, et al. Evaluating the role of levels of exposure to a task shared depression counselling intervention led by behavioural health counsellors: outcome and process evaluation. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019;13:42.
  • Petersen I, Fairall L, Zani B, et al. Effectiveness of a task-sharing collaborative care model for identification and management of depressive symptoms in patients with hypertension attending public sector primary care clinics in south africa: pragmatic parallel cluster randomised controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2020;282:112–121.
  • Edwards N, Barker PM. The importance of context in implementation research. JAIDS. 2014;67:S157–S162.
  • Grant A, Treweek S, Dreischulte T, et al. Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting. Trials. 2013;14:15.
  • Limbani F, Goudge J, Joshi R, et al. Process evaluation in the field: global learnings from seven implementation research hypertension projects in low-and middle-income countries. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:953.
  • Meffert SM, Neylan TC, Chambers DA, et al. Novel implementation research designs for scaling up global mental health care: overcoming translational challenges to address the world’s leading cause of disability. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016;10:19.
  • Betancourt TS, Chambers DA. Optimizing an era of global mental health implementation science. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:99–100.
  • Pfadenhauer LM, Gerhardus A, Mozygemba K, et al. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Implement Sci. 2017;12:21.
  • Lund C, Tomlinson M, Patel V. Integration of mental health into primary care in low- and middle-income countries: the prime mental healthcare plans. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208:s1–s3.
  • van Rensburg AJ, Fourie P. Health policy and integrated mental health care in the sadc region: strategic clarification using the rainbow model. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016;10:49.
  • Petersen I, Fairall L, Bhana A, et al. Integrating mental health into chronic care in south africa: the development of a district mental healthcare plan. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208:s29–s39.
  • Hanlon C, Luitel NP, Kathree T, et al. Challenges and opportunities for implementing integrated mental health care: a district level situation analysis from five low- and middle-income countries. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e88437.
  • Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2009.
  • Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual. 2008;13:544–559.
  • Ragin C. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzysets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2008.
  • Legewie N. An introduction to applied data analysis with qualitative comparative analysis. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2013;14:3.
  • Schneider CQ, Wagemann C. Qualitative comparative analysis (qca) and fuzzy-sets: agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique. Comp Sociol. 2010;9:376–396. .
  • Ragin C. Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsqca). Configurational Comp Methods. 2009;512009:87–121.
  • Chatterley C, Javernick-Will A, Linden KG, et al. A qualitative comparative analysis of well-managed school sanitation in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:6.
  • Warren J, Wistow J, Bambra C. Applying qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in public health: a case study of a health improvement service for long-term incapacity benefit recipients. J Public Health. 2013;36:126–133.
  • Breuer E, Subba P, Luitel N, et al. Using qualitative comparative analysis and theory of change to unravel the effects of a mental health intervention on service utilisation in nepal. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3:e001023.
  • Pattyn V, Molenveld A, Befani B. Qualitative Comparative Analysis as an evaluation tool: lessons From an application in development cooperation. Am J Eval. 2019;40:55–74.
  • Ragin C, Davey S. FS/QCA. 3.0. Irvine: University of California; 2017.
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–613.
  • Kohrt BA, Jordans MJ, Rai S, et al. Therapist competence in global mental health: development of the enhancing assessment of common therapeutic factors (enact) rating scale. Behav Res Ther. 2015;69:11–21.
  • Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.
  • Thomann E, Maggetti M. Designing research with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): approaches, challenges, and tools. Sociol Methods Res. 2020;49:356–386.
  • Kent R. Using FSQCA: a brief guide and workshop for fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. 2008. Available at: http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/cmist/archive-publications/working-papers/2008/2008-10-teaching-paper-fsqca.pdf
  • Byrne D. Evaluating complex social interventions in a complex world. Evaluation. 2013;19:217–228.
  • Luig T, Asselin J, Sharma AM, et al. Understanding implementation of complex interventions in primary care teams. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31:431–444.
  • May C, Finch T, Mair F, et al. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the Normalization Process Model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:148.
  • Cragun D, Pal T, Vadaparampil ST, et al. Qualitative comparative analysis: a hybrid method for identifying factors associated with program effectiveness. J Mix Methods Res. 2016;10:251–272. .
  • Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, et al. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2:40.
  • Pérez D, Van Der Stuyft P, Zabala M, et al. A modified theoretical framework to assess implementation fidelity of adaptive public health interventions. Implement Sci. 2016;11:91.
  • Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:65–76.
  • Rojas-Andrade R, Bahamondes LL. Is implementation fidelity important? A systematic review on school-based mental health programs. Contemp Sch Psychol. 2019;23:339–350. .
  • Kutash K, Cross B, Madias A, et al. Description of a fidelity implementation system: an example from a community-based children’s mental health program. J Child Fam Stud. 2012;201:21.
  • Breitenstein SM, Gross D, Garvey CA, et al. Implementation fidelity in community-based interventions. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33:164–173.
  • Visagie S, Schneider M. Implementation of the principles of primary health care in a rural area of South Africa. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2014;6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v6i1.562
  • Edwards N, Davies B, Ploeg J, et al. Implementing nursing best practice guidelines: impact on patient referrals. BMC Nurs. 2007;6:4.
  • Anthony JS, Baik S-Y, Bowers BJ, et al. Conditions that influence a primary care clinician’s decision to refer patients for depression care. Rehabilitation Nurs. 2010;35:113–122. .
  • Archer J, Bower P, Gilbody S, et al. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:Cd006525.
  • Vera M, Perez-Pedrogo C, Huertas SE, et al. Collaborative care for depressed patients with chronic medical conditions: a randomized trial in puerto rico. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61:144–150.
  • Bower P, Knowles S, Coventry PA, et al. Counselling for mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;7:Cd001025.
  • Hall P. Interprofessional teamwork: professional cultures as barriers. J Interprof Care. 2005;19:188–196.
  • Ødegård A, Strype J. Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration within child mental health care in norway. J Interprof Care. 2009;23:286–296.
  • Salhani D, Coulter I. The politics of interprofessional working and the struggle for professional autonomy in nursing. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:1221–1228.
  • Knowles SE, Chew-Graham C, Coupe N, et al. Better together? A naturalistic qualitative study of inter-professional working in collaborative care for co-morbid depression and physical health problems. Implement Sci. 2013;8:110.
  • Mitchell R, Parker V, Giles M, et al. Review: toward realizing the potential of diversity in composition of interprofessional health care teams: an examination of the cognitive and psychosocial dynamics of interprofessional collaboration. Med Care Res Rev. 2010;67:3–26.
  • Suter E, Arndt J, Arthur N, et al. Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. J Interprof Care. 2009;23:41–51.
  • Christensen C, Larson JR Jr. Collaborative medical decision making. Med Decis Making. 1993;13:339–346.
  • Berg-Schlosser D, De Meur G, Rihoux B, et al. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach. Configurational Comp Methods. 2009;12009:18.
  • Baumgartner M. Parsimony and causality. Qual Quant. 2015;49:839–856.
  • Baumgartner M, Thiem A. Model ambiguities in configurational comparative research. Sociol Methods Res. 2017;46:954–987.
  • Cooper B, Glaesser J. Paradoxes and pitfalls in using fuzzy set qca: illustrations from a critical review of a study of educational inequality. Sociol Methods Res. 2011;16:106–119.
  • Hoeft TJ, Fortney JC, Patel V, et al. Task-sharing approaches to improve mental health care in rural and other low-resource settings: a systematic review. J Rural Health. 2018;34:48–62.
  • Petersen I, van Rensburg A, Gigaba SG, et al. Health systems strengthening to optimise scale-up in global mental health in low- and middle-income countries: lessons from the frontlines. A re-appraisal. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020;29:e135–e135.