References and suggested readings
- Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 114. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40236733
- Bromme, R., & Goldman, S. R. (2014). The public's bounded understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.921572
- Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(1), 6–10.
- Bullock, O. M., Colón Amill, D., Shulman, H. C., & Dixon, G. N. (2019). Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: Evidence from metacognition. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 845–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519865687
- Cahill, M., Joo, S., Howard, M., Ingraham Dwyer, J., King-Oaks, K., & Yates, B. (2020). What is storytime good for and what makes storytime good? A survey of public library directors. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(4), 1000–1014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619898224
- Cooper, T. B. (2019). The impromptu rhetorical situation. Communication Teacher, 33(4), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2019.1575429
- Frey, T. K. (2021). Overcoming technological barriers to instruction: Situating Gen Z students as reverse mentors. Frontiers in Communication: Culture and Communication, 6, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.630899
- Gerson, M. S. (2015). Writing that works: A teacher’s guide to technical writing. Kansas Curriculum Center. http://toefl.uobabylon.edu.iq/papers/itp_2015_ 41931767.pdf
- Last, S. (2019). Technical writing essentials. University of Victoria. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/technicalwriting/
- McHendry Jr, G. F., Kirby, E. L., & Leighter, J. L. (2018). John Oliver’s long rants: Teaching the modes of persuasion in an online public speaking class. In J. S. Seiter, J. Peeples, & M. L. Sanders (Eds.), Communication in the classroom: A collection of G.I.F.T.S (pp. 65–68). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
- Penrose, R. B. (2023). Normalizing disability using children’s literature. Communication Teacher, 37(3), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2022.2162558
- Punyanunt-Carter, N. M., & Arias, V. S. (2018). Acting out: An interactive activity for reducing ineffective public speaking behaviors. In J. S. Seiter, J. Peeples, & M. L. Sanders (Eds.), Communication in the classroom: A collection of G.I.F.T.S (pp. 79–81). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
- Tijerina, T., Powell, T., Arnett, J., Logan, M., Race, C., Linimon, L., & Monroe, J. (2017). Open technical communication. University System of Georgia. https://oer.galileo.usg.edu/communication-textbooks/2
- Zaelzer, C. (2020). The value in science-art partnerships for science education and science communication. Eneuro, 7(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0238-20.2020