Spotlight on the delivery of photosensitizers: different approaches for photodynamic-based therapies

References

• Celli JP, Spring BQ, Rizvi I, et al. Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization. Chem Rev. 2010;110:2795–2838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans DE, Fukumura D, Jain RK. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:380–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castano AP, Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part one-photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2004;1:279–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oniszczuk A, Wojtunik-Kulesza KA, Oniszczuk T, et al. The potential of photodynamic therapy (PDT) – experimental investigations and clinical use. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016;83:912–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte C, Maiolino S, Pellosi DS, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles for cancer photodynamic therapy. In: light-responsive nanostructured systems for applications in nanomedicine. Gewerbestrasse: Springer. 2016;61–112.
   Google Scholar
• Erkiert-Polguj A, Halbina A, Polak-Pacholczyk I, et al. Light-emitting diodes in photodynamic therapy in non-melanoma skin cancers own observations and literature review. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016;18:105–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng Y, Zou C, Madiyalakan R, et al. Water-soluble and biocompatible sono/photosensitizer nanoparticles for enhanced cancer therapy. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2010;5:1559–1569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duco W, Grosso V, Zaccari D, et al. Generation of ROS mediated by mechanical waves (ultrasound) and its possible applications. Methods. 2016;109:141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon I, Li JZ, Shim YK. Advance in photosensitizers and light delivery for photodynamic therapy. Clin Endosc. 2013;46:7–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kempa M, Kozub P, Kimball J, et al. Physicochemical properties of potential porphyrin photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Spectrochim Acta A. 2015;146:249–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormond AB, Freeman HS. Dye sensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Materials. 2013;6:817–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty C, Das M, Sahoo SK. Emerging role of nanocarriers to increase the solubility and bioavailability of curcumin. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9:1347–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang YY, Sharma SK, Dai T, et al. Can nanotechnology potentiate photodynamic therapy? Nanotech Rev. 2012;1:111–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deda DK, Araki K. Nanotechnology, light and chemical action: an effective combination to kill cancer cells. J Braz Chem Soc. 2015;26:2448–2470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz J, Kaser-Hotz B, Khan T, et al. Optimizing photodynamic therapy: in vivo pharmacokinetics of liposomal meta-(tetrahydroxyphenyl) chlorin in feline squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:7538–7544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai LY, Yang XQ, An J, et al. Multifunctional magnetic-hollow gold nanospheres for bimodal cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy. Nanotechnology. 2015;26:315701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Wu M, Zeng Y, et al. Chlorin e6 conjugated poly (dopamine) nanospheres as PDT/PTT dual-modal therapeutic agents for enhanced cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:8176–8187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellosi DS, Tessaro AL, Moret F, et al. Pluronic® mixed micelles as efficient nanocarriers for benzoporphyrin derivatives applied to photodynamic therapy in cancer cells. J Photochem Photobiol A. 2016;314:143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie L, Wang G, Zhou H, et al. Functional long circulating single walled carbon nanotubes for fluorescent/photoacoustic imaging-guided enhanced phototherapy. Biomaterials. 2016;103:219–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolfarini GC, Siqueira-Moura MP, Demets GJ, et al. In vitro evaluation of combined hyperthermia and photodynamic effects using magnetoliposomes loaded with cucurbituril zinc phthalocyanine complex on melanoma. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2012;115:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hussein A, Mfouo-Tynga I, Abdel-Harith M, et al. Comparative study between the photodynamic ability of gold and silver nanoparticles in mediating cell death in breast and lung cancer cell lines. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2015;153:67–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganoth A, Merimi KC, Peer D. Overcoming multidrug resistance with nanomedicines. Expert Opin Drug Del. 2015;12:223–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee N, Yoo D, Ling D, et al. Iron oxide based nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and magnetoresponsive therapy. Chem Rev. 2015;115:10637–10689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Souza GG, Weissig V. Subcellular targeting: a new frontier for drug-loaded pharmaceutical nanocarriers and the concept of the magic bullet. Expert Opin Drug Del. 2009;6:1135–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua S, Mitragotri1 S. Challenges associated with penetration of nanoparticles across cell and tissue barriers: a review of current status and future prospects. Nano Today. 2014;9:223–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadell B. Sizing up the safety of nanomaterials. Eur J Nanomed. 2015;7:141–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vllasaliu D, Fowler R, Stolnik S. PEGylated nanomedicines: recent progress and remaining concerns. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014;11:139–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram J, Zhu M, Yang Y, et al. Y. Safety of nanoparticles in medicine. Curr Drug Targets. 2015;16:1671–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du B, Han S, Li H, et al. Multi-functional liposomes showing radiofrequency-triggered release and magnetic resonance imaging for tumor multi-mechanism therapy. Nanoscale. 2015;7:5411–5426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemesh CS, Moshkelani D, Zhang H. Thermosensitive liposome formulated indocyanine green for near-infrared triggered photodynamic therapy: in vivo evaluation for triple-negative breast cancer. Pharm Res. 2015;32:1604–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy GR, Bhojani MS, McConville P, et al. Vascular targeted nanoparticles for imaging and treatment of brain tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6677–6686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Ho W, Zhang X, et al. Cancer nanomedicine: from targeted delivery to combination therapy. Trends Mol Med. 2015;21:223–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong EJ, Choi DG, Shim MS. Targeted and effective photodynamic therapy for cancer using functionalized nanomaterials. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2016;6:297–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang HD, Tang J, Halliwell M. Sonoporation, drug delivery, and gene therapy. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010;224:343–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielichowska A, Saczko J, Garbiec A, et al. The photodynamic effect of far-red range phthalocyanines (AlPc and Pc green) supported by electropermeabilization in human gastric adenocarcinoma cells of sensitive and resistant type. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;69:145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josefsen LB, Boyle RW. Unique diagnostic and therapeutic roles of porphyrins and phthalocyanines in photodynamic therapy, imaging and theranostics. Theranostics. 2012;2:916–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Di Y, Chen D, et al. Combined chemo-and photo-thermal therapy delivered by multifunctional theranostic gold nanorod-loaded microcapsules. Nanoscale. 2015;7:8884–8897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellosi DS, Calori IR, de Paula LB, et al. Multifunctional theranostic pluronic mixed micelles improve targeted photoactivity of verteporfin in cancer cells. Mat Sci Eng C. 2017;71:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellosi DS, Moret F, Fraix A, et al. Pluronic® P123/F127 mixed micelles delivering sorafenib and its combination with verteporfin in cancer cells. Int J Nanomed. 2016;11:4479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rishi P, Rishi E, Bhende M, et al. Comparison of photodynamic therapy, ranibizumab/bevacizumab or combination in the treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularisation: a 9-year-study from a single centre. Br J Ophthal. 2016;bjophthalmol-2015:307802.
   Google Scholar
• Tan X, Pang X, Lei M, et al. An efficient dual-loaded multifunctional nanocarrier for combined photothermal and photodynamic therapy based on copper sulfide and chlorin e6. Int J Pharm. 2016;503:220–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calixto GMF, Bernegossi J, De Freitas LM, et al. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for photodynamic therapy of cancer: A review. Molecules. 2016;21:342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopelman R, Koo YEL, Philbert M, et al. Multifunctional nanoparticle platforms for in vivo MRI enhancement and photodynamic therapy of a rat brain cancer. J Magn Magn Mater. 2005;293:404–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siqueira-Moura MP, Primo FL, Espreafico EM, et al. Development, characterization, and photocytotoxicity assessment on human melanoma of chloroaluminum phthalocyanine nanocapsules. Mat Sci Eng C. 2013;33:1744–1752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuser PE, Fernandes AC, Nele M, et al. Simultaneous encapsulation of magnetic nanoparticles and zinc phthalocyanine in poly (methyl methacrylate) nanoparticles by miniemulsion polymerization and in vitro studies. Colloid Surface B. 2015;135:357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandoth N, Kirejev V, Monti S, et al. Two-photon fluorescence imaging and bimodal phototherapy of epidermal cancer cells with biocompatible self-assembled polymer nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:1768–1776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng L, Luo L, Pan Y, et al. In vivo targeted magnetic resonance imaging and visualized photodynamic therapy in deep-tissue cancers using folic acid-functionalized superparamagnetic-upconversion nanocomposites. Nanoscale. 2015;7:8946–8954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Das GK, Vijayaragavan V, et al. “Smart” theranostic lanthanide nanoprobes with simultaneous up-conversion fluorescence and tunable T1-T2 magnetic resonance imaging contrast and near-infrared activated photodynamic therapy. Nanoscale. 2014;6:12609–12617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haedicke K, Kozlova D, Grafe S, et al. Multifunctional calcium phosphate nanoparticles for combining near-infrared fluorescence imaging and photodynamic therapy. Acta Biomater. 2015;14:197–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Paula LB, Primo FL, Pinto MR, et al. Combination of hyperthermia and photodynamic therapy on mesenchymal stem cell line treated with chloroaluminum phthalocyanine magnetic-nanoemulsion. J Magn Magn Mat. 2015;380:372–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y, Zhao KK, Feng D, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of anti-VEGF monotherapy versus PDT and intravitreal anti-VEGF combination treatment in AMD: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9:1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YW, Su YL, Hu SH, et al. Functionalized graphene nanocomposites for enhancing photothermal therapy in tumor treatment. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2016;105(Pt B):190–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Zhao X, Wang S, et al. Biologically inspired polydopamine capped gold nanorods for drug delivery and light-mediated cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:24368–24384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Shi S, Huang Y, et al. Simultaneous photodynamic and photothermal therapy using photosensitizer-functionalized Pd nanosheets by single continuous wave laser. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:8878–8885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KS, Kim J, Lee JY, et al. Stimuli-responsive magnetic nanoparticles for tumor-targeted bimodal imaging and photodynamic/hyperthermia combination therapy. Nanoscale. 2016;8:11625–11634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanase S, Nomura J, Matsumura Y, et al. Synergistic interaction of 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy with simultaneous hyperthermia in an osteosarcoma tumor model. Int J Oncol. 2006;29:365–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Wang C, Cui W, et al. Combined photothermal and photodynamic therapy delivered by PEGylated MoS2 nanosheets. Nanoscale. 2014;6:11219–11225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Jiao X, Chen Q, et al. A multi-functional nanoplatform for tumor synergistic phototherapy. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:085104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu A, Lee JH, Lee HG, et al. Prussian blue/serum albumin/indocyanine green as a multifunctional nanotheranostic agent for bimodal imaging guided laser mediated combinatorial phototherapy. J Control Release. 2016;236:90–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Yang G, Gai S, et al. Au 25 cluster functionalized metal–organic nanostructures for magnetically targeted photodynamic/photothermal therapy triggered by single wavelength 808 nm near-infrared light. Nanoscale. 2015;7:19568–19578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taratula O, Doddapaneni BS, Schumann C, et al. Naphthalocyanine-based biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles for image-guided combinatorial phototherapy. Chem Mater. 2015;27:6155–6165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang BP, Hu LF, Wang DJ, et al. Graphene loading water-soluble phthalocyanine for dual-modality photothermal/photodynamic therapy via a one-step method. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2:7141–7148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Huang H, Huang J, et al. Noncovalent ruthenium (II) complexes-single-walled carbon nanotube composites for bimodal photothermal and photodynamic therapy with near-infrared irradiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:23278–23290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byarugaba DK. Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries and responsible risk factors. Int J Antimicrob Ag. 2004;24:105–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulos RA. Antimicrobial dyes and mechanosensitive channels. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2013;104:155–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatansever F, De Melo WC, Avci P, et al. Antimicrobial strategies centered around reactive oxygen species–bactericidal antibiotics, photodynamic therapy, and beyond. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37:955–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor PW, Stapleton PD, Luzio JP. New ways to treat bacterial infections. Drug Discov Today. 2002;7:1086–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalieri F, Tortora M, Stringaro A, et al. Nanomedicines for antimicrobial interventions. J Hosp Infect. 2014;88:183–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro JBP, Miranda-Vilela AL, Graziani D, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic miltefosine associated with photodynamic therapy with liposomal chloroaluminium phthalocyanine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (L.) amazonensis in C57BL/6 mice. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2016;13:282–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmello JC, Alves F, Ribeiro APD, et al. In vivo photodynamic inactivation of Candida albicans using chloro-aluminum phthalocyanine. Oral Dis. 2016;22:415–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spagnul C, Turner LC, Boyle RW. Immobilized photosensitizers for antimicrobial applications. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2015;150:11–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immordino ML, Dosio F, Cattel L. Stealth liposomes: review of the basic science, rationale, and clinical applications, existing and potential. Int J Nanomed. 2006;1:297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivest V, Phivilay A, Julien C, et al. Novel liposomal formulation for targeted gene delivery. Pharmaceut Res. 2007;24:981–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy-Nissenbaum E, Radovic-Moreno AF, Wang AZ, et al. Nanotechnology and aptamers: applications in drug delivery. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:442–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranz S, Guellmar A, Volpel A, et al. Photodynamic suppression of Enterococcus faecalis using the photosensitizer mTHPC. Lasers Surg Med. 2011;43:241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagahara A, Mitani A, Fukuda M, et al. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy using a diode laser with a potential new photosensitizer, indocyanine green-loaded nanospheres, may be effective for the clearance of Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Periodontal Res. 2013;48:591–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Freitas LM, Calixto GMF, Chorilli M, et al. Polymeric nanoparticle-based photodynamic therapy for chronic periodontitis in vivo. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planas O, Bresolí-Obach R, Nos J, et al. Synthesis, photophysical characterization, and photoinduced antibacterial activity of methylene blue-loaded amino-and mannose-targeted mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Molecules. 2015;20:6284–6298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Liu T, Zou Q, et al. Water-soluble benzylidene cyclopentanone based photosensitizers for in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ristic BZ, Milenkovic MM, Dakic IR, et al. Photodynamic antibacterial effect of graphene quantum dots. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4428–4435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinholc M, Nakonieczna J, Fila G, et al. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with fulleropyrrolidine: photoinactivation mechanism of Staphylococcus aureus, in vitro and in vivo studies. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2015;99:4031–4043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dizaj SM, Mennati A, Jafari S, et al. Antimicrobial activity of carbon-based nanoparticles. Adv Pharm Bull. 2015;5:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, Francis WR, et al. Transforming healthcare through regenerative medicine. BMC Med. 2016;14:115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• França CM, Anders JJ, Lanzafame RJ. Photobiomodulation in wound healing: what are we not considering? Photomed Laser Surg. 2016;34:51–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadur-Andrade N, Barbosa AM, Carlos FP, et al. Effects of photobiostimulation on edema and hemorrhage induced by Bothrops moojeni venom. Laser Med Sci. 2012;27:65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loreti EH, Pascoal VLW, Nogueira BV, et al. Use of laser therapy in the healing process: a literature review. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015;33:104–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passarella S, Karu T. Absorption of monochromatic and narrow band radiation in the visible and near IR by both mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial photoacceptors results in photobiomodulation. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2014;140:344–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barolet D, Christiaens F, Hamblin MR. Infrared and skin: friend or foe. J J Photochem Photobiol B. 2016;155:78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen AC, Arany PR, Huang YY, et al. Low-level laser therapy activates NF-kB via generation of reactive oxygen species in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Plos One. 2011;6:e22453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pillouer-Prost A, Cartier H. Photodynamic photorejuvenation: a review. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42:21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen K, Bjerring P, Troilius A. 5-ALA for photodynamic photorejuvenation – optimization of treatment regime based on normal-skin fluorescence measurements. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39:302–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simioni AR, Coulomb B, Couty L, et al. Photodynamic therapy preservers elastic network from degradation in an ex vivo human skin model. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:A80.
   Google Scholar
• Jesus PC, Saeki SI, Tedesco AC. An ex vivo study of photobiostimulation in the treatment of skin pathologies. J Biophotonics. 2016;9:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyhimi P, Khademi H, Birang R, et al. Histological evaluation of wound healing process after photodynamic therapy of rat oral mucosal ulcer. J Dent. 2016;17:43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Carneiro VSM, De Vasconcelos Catao MHC, Menezes RF, et al. Methylene blue photodynamic therapy in rats’ wound healing: 21 days follow-up. Int Soc Optic Photonics. 2015;9531:1S.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Dai T, Hamblin MR. Effect of red and near-infrared wavelengths on low-level laser (light) therapy-induced healing of partial-thickness dermal abrasion in mice. Laser Med Sci. 2014;29:257–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arany PR. Craniofacial wound healing with photobiomodulation therapy new insights and current challenges. J Dent Res. 2016;95:977–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar