Dual mobility acetabular cups for total hip arthroplasty: advantages and drawbacks

References

• Bousquet G, Argenson C, Godeneche JL, et al. Recovery after aseptic loosening of cemented total hip arthroplasties with Bousquet’s cementless prosthesis. Apropos of 136 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1986;72(Suppl 2):70–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charnley J, Kamangar A, Longfield MD. The optimum size of prosthetic heads in relation to the wear of plastic sockets in total replacement of the hip. Med Biol Eng. 1969;7:31–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, et al. A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop. 2014;38:1125–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyer D, Caton JH. Once upon a time…. dual mobility: history. Int Orthop. 2017;41:611–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farizon F, de Lavison R, Azoulai JJ, et al. Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility. A Twelve-Year Follow-Up Study. Int Orthop. 1998;22:219–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer B, Neri T, Di Iorio A, et al. The linear penetration rate is not relevant for evaluating wear of dual mobility cups: an explant study. Int Orthop. 2017;41:599–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geringer J, Boyer B, Farizon F. Understanding the dual mobility concept for total hip arthroplasty. Investigations on a multiscale analysis-highlighting the role of arthrofibrosis. Wear. 2011;271:2379–2385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer B, Neri T, Geringer J, et al. Long-term wear of dual mobility total hip replacement cups: explant study. Int Orthop. 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer B, Neri T, Geringer J, et al. Understanding wear in dual mobility total hip replacement: first generation explant wear patterns. Int Orthop. 2017;41:529–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbert L, Geringer J, Boyer B, et al. Wear analysis of hip explants, dual mobility concept: comparison of quantitative and qualitative analyses. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol. 2012;226:838–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neri T, Boyer B, Geringer J, et al. Intraprosthetic dislocation of dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: still occurring? Int Orthop. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer B, Neri T, Geringer J, et al. Letter to the Editor on “Contemporary dual mobility head penetration at five years: concern for the additional convex bearing surface?”. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Jul 21]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540318305588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neri T, Philippot R, Farizon F, et al. Results of primary total hip replacement with first generation Bousquet dual mobility socket with more than twenty five years follow up. About a series of two hundred and twelve hips. Int Orthop. 2017;41:557–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippot R, Farizon F, Camilleri J-P, et al. Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthopédique Réparatrice Appar Mot. 2008;94:e23–e27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop. 2012;36:511–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massin P, Orain V, Philippot R, et al. Fixation failures of dual mobility cups: a mid-term study of 2601 hip replacements. Clin Orthop. 2012;470:1932–1940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq S, Benoit JY, de Rosa JP, et al. Evora® chromium-cobalt dual mobility socket: results at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2013;99:923–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudhon J-L, Ferreira A, Verdier R. Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at ten years of follow-up. Int Orthop. 2013;37:2345–2350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippot R, Meucci JF, Boyer B, et al. Modern dual-mobility cup implanted with an uncemented stem: about 100 cases with 12-year follow-up. Surg Technol Int. 2013;23:208–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vermersch T, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, et al. Prospective longitudinal study of one hundred patients with total hip arthroplasty using a second-generation cementless dual-mobility cup. Int Orthop. 2015;39:2097–2101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurendon L, Philippot R, Neri T, et al. Ten-year clinical and radiological outcomes of 100 total hip arthroplasty cases with a modern cementless dual mobility cup. Surg Technol Int. 2018;32:331–336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferreira A, Prudhon J-L, Verdier R, et al. Contemporary dual-mobility cup regional and private register: methodology and results. Int Orthop. 2017;41:439–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond OJ, Konan S, Greidanus NV, et al. An early report of the use of a modular dual mobility articulation in revision acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2961–2966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutter EG, McClellan TR, Attarian DE, et al. Outcomes of modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:S220–S224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow BT, Ortiz PA, Boles JW, et al. What are normal metal ion levels after total hip arthroplasty? A serologic analysis of four bearing surfaces. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:1535–1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam D, Salih R, Brown KM, et al. Metal ion levels in young, active patients receiving a modular, dual mobility total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:1581–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubriot JH, Lesimple P, Leclercq S. Study of Bousquet’s non-cemented acetabular implant in 100 hybrid total hip prostheses (Charnley type cemented femoral component). Average 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg. 1993;59(Suppl 1):267–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, et al. The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop. 2011;35:225–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldinger PR, Jung AW, Pritsch M, et al. Uncemented grit-blasted straight tapered titanium stems in patients younger than fifty-five years of age. Fifteen to Twenty-Year Results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1432–1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Park J-S. The 27 to 29-year outcomes of the PCA total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years old. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:2256–2261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon TR, Rowe S-M, Kim M-S, et al. Fifteen- to 20-year results of uncemented tapered fully porous-coated cobalt-chrome stems. Int Orthop. 2008;32:317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant P, Nordsletten L. Total hip arthroplasty with the Lord prosthesis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:2636–2641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bojescul JA, Xenos JS, Callaghan JJ, et al. Results of porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty without cement at fifteen years: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1079–1083.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Della Valle CJ, Mesko NW, Quigley L, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1130–1135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wroblewski BM. 15–21-year results of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1986;(211):30–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, et al. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:171–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan JJ, Templeton JE, Liu SS, et al. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:690–695.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epinette J-A. Clinical outcomes, survivorship and adverse events with mobile-bearings versus fixed-bearings in hip arthroplasty-a prospective comparative cohort study of 143 ADM versus 130 trident cups at 2 to 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigdorchik JM, D’Apuzzo MR, Markel DC, et al. Lack of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty with a new dual mobility acetabular design. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther. 2015;25:34–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecuire F, Benareau I, Rubini J, et al. [Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket]. Rev Chir Orthopédique Réparatrice Appar Mot. 2004;90:249–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F. Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop. 2013;471:965–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klement MR, Hubbard EW, Wellman SS, et al. Acute intraprosthetic dissociation of a dual-mobility hip in the United States. Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ. 2017;46:E154–E159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Odland AN, Sierra RJ. Intraprosthetic dislocation of a contemporary dual-mobility design used during conversion THA. Orthopedics. 2014;37:e1124–e1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell BS, De Martino I, Sculco T, et al. Total hip arthroplasty dislocations are more complex than they appear: a case report of intraprosthetic dislocation of an anatomic dual-mobility implant after closed reduction. Ochsner J. 2016;16:185–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi V, Akinbo O. Early intraprosthetic dislocation of a dual mobility acetabular construct after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Case Rep. 2017;7:21–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loubignac F, Felts E, Allal R. Early intraprosthetic dislocation of a total hip replacement with dual mobility socket: clinical presentation and update review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol. 2012;22(Suppl 1):85–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Martino I, Triantafyllopoulos GK, Sculco PK, et al. Dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2014;5:180–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cvetanovich GL, Fillingham YA, Della Valle CJ, et al. Intraprosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility bearings associated with closed reduction: a report of two cases. JBJS Case Connect. 2015;5:e26.
   Google Scholar
• Di Laura A, Hothi HS, Henckel J, et al. Retrieval evidence of impingement at the third articulation in contemporary dual mobility cups for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2017;41:2495–2501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabry C, Langlois J, Hamadouche M, et al. Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Int Orthop. 2016;40:901–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois J, El Hage S, Hamadouche M. Intraprosthetic dislocation: a potentially serious complication of dual mobility acetabular cups. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43:1013–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nebergall AK, Freiberg AA, Greene ME, et al. Analysis of dual mobility liner rim damage using retrieved components and cadaver models. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:1595–1602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsen KLJ, Pollag KE, Yoo JY, et al. Serum metal ion levels following total hip arthroplasty with modular dual mobility components. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:186–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernigou P, Dubory A, Potage D, et al. Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision. Int Orthop. 2017;41:481–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, et al. The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop. 2009;33:927–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq S, Benoit J-Y, de Rosa J-P, et al. Résultat à cinq ans de la cupule à double mobilité Evora. Rev Chir Orthopédique Réparatrice Appar Mot. 2008;94:37–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, et al. Unconstrained tripolar implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:849–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauchu P, Bonnard O, Cyprès A, et al. The dual-mobility POLARCUP: first results from a multicenter study. Orthopedics. 2008;31(12 Suppl 2). pii: orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=37180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchet R, Mercier N, Saragaglia D. Posterior approach and dislocation rate: a 213 total hip replacements case-control study comparing the dual mobility cup with a conventional 28-mm metal head/polyethylene prosthesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2011;97:2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudhon JL. Dual-mobility cup and cemented femoral component: 6 year follow-up results. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther. 2011;21:713–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combes A, Migaud H, Girard J, et al. Low rate of dislocation of dual-mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2013;471:3891–3900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed R, Hayward K, Mulay S, et al. Outcomes of dual-mobility acetabular cup for instability in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol Off J Ital Soc Orthop Traumatol. 2015;16:9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamadouche M, Arnould H, Bouxin B. Is a cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option? Clin Orthop. 2012;470:3048–3053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batailler C, Fary C, Verdier R, et al. The evolution of outcomes and indications for the dual-mobility cup: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2017;41:645–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippot R, Neri T, Boyer B, et al. Bousquet dual mobility socket for patient under fifty years old. More than twenty year follow-up of one hundred and thirty one hips. Int Orthop. 2017;41:589–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan JJ, Forest EE, Sporer SM, et al. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult. Clin Orthop. 1997;(344):257–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epinette J-A, Béracassat R, Tracol P, et al. Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients? J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1323–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puch J-M, Derhi G, Descamps L, et al. Dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty five years and over ten years of follow-up : A prospective and comparative series. Int Orthop. 2017;41:475–480.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:1788–1792.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, et al. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop. 2006;447:19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips CB, Barrett JA, Losina E, et al. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen R, Ovesen O, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, et al. Constrained liners for recurrent dislocations in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther. 2007;17:78–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan RJK, Fick D, Alakeson R, et al. A constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:870–876.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shrader MW, Parvizi J, Lewallen DG. The use of a constrained acetabular component to treat instability after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:2179–2183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carulli C, Macera A, Matassi F, et al. The use of a dual mobility cup in the management of recurrent dislocations of hip hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol Off J Ital Soc Orthop Traumatol. 2016;17:131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civinini R, Carulli C, Matassi F, et al. A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions. Clin Orthop. 2012;470:3542–3548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangin A, Boulat S, Farizon F, et al. Prevention of dislocation risk during hip revision surgery with the dual mobility concept; study of a new generation of dual mobility cups. Surg Technol Int. 2016;29:314–319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G, et al. Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. Clin Orthop. 2009;467:465–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haen TX, Lonjon G, Vandenbussche E. Can cemented dual-mobility cups be used without a reinforcement device in cases of mild acetabular bone stock alteration in total hip arthroplasty? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2015;101:923–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, et al. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:442–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamadouche M, Biau DJ, Huten D, et al. The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Clin Orthop. 2010;468:3248–3254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamadouche M, Ropars M, Rodaix C, et al. Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Int Orthop. 2017;41:513–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen T, Kappel A, Hansen F, et al. The dislocating hip replacement - revision with a dual mobility cup in 56 consecutive patients. Open Orthop J. 2014;8:268–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jauregui JJ, Pierce TP, Elmallah RK, et al. Dual mobility cups: an effective prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasties for preventing dislocations. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther. 2016;26:57–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlais FL, Ropars M, Gaucher F, et al. Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop. 2008;466:389–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiber-Wackenheim F, Brunschweiler B, Ehlinger M, et al. Treatment of recurrent THR dislocation using of a cementless dual-mobility cup: a 59 cases series with a mean 8 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2011;97:8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massin P, Besnier L. Acetabular revision using a press-fit dual mobility cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2010;96:9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertl P, Combes A, Leiber-Wackenheim F, et al. Recurrence of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty revision using dual mobility cups was rare in 180 hips followed over 7 years. HSS J Musculoskelet J Hosp Spec Surg. 2012;8:251–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pattyn C, Audenaert E. Early complications after revision total hip arthroplasty with cemented dual-mobility socket and reinforcement ring. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78:357–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippot R, Adam P, Reckhaus M, et al. Prevention of dislocation in total hip revision surgery using a dual mobility design. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2009;95:407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer DR, Botero HG, Berend KR, et al. Salvage of monoblock metal-on-metal acetabular components using a dual-mobility bearing. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:846–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer DR, Christy JM, Sporer SM, et al. Dual-Mobility Articulations for Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:131–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudhon JL, Steffann F, Ferreira A, et al. Cementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision. Int Orthop. 2014;38:2463–2468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saragaglia D, Ruatti S, Refaie R. Relevance of a press-fit dual mobility cup to deal with recurrent dislocation of conventional total hip arthroplasty: a 29-case series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol. 2013;23:431–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider L, Philippot R, Boyer B, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2011;97:807–813.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simian E, Chatellard R, Druon J, et al. Dual mobility cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: dislocation rate and survival after 5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2015;101:577–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snir N, Park BK, Garofolo G, et al. Revision of failed hip resurfacing and large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility components. Orthopedics. 2015;38:369–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heumen M, Heesterbeek PJC, Swierstra BA, et al. Dual mobility acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty for persistent dislocation: no dislocations in 50 hips after 1–5 years. J Orthop Traumatol Off J Ital Soc Orthop Traumatol. 2015;16:15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegrzyn J, Pibarot V, Jacquel A, et al. Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull cross-plate, structural allograft and cemented dual-mobility cup in revision THA at a minimum 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:432–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegrzyn J, Tebaa E, Jacquel A, et al. Can dual mobility cups prevent dislocation in all situations after revision total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:631–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom MP, Lehman AP, Buly RL, et al. Acetabular revision with the Contour antiprotrusio cage: 2- to 5-year followup. Clin Orthop. 2006;453:188–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pieringer H, Auersperg V, Böhler N. Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone-deficiency: the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:489–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawanabe K, Akiyama H, Onishi E, et al. Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:26–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adam P, Philippe R, Ehlinger M, et al. Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2012;98:296–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarasevicius S, Busevicius M, Robertsson O, et al. Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation rate after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensen AS, Jakobsen T, Krarup N. Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation and re-operation when used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop. 2014;38:1241–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Wood AM, Keenan ACM, et al. Does body mass index affect clinical outcome post-operatively and at five years after primary unilateral total hip replacement performed for osteoarthritis? A multivariate analysis of prospective data. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1178–1182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadr Azodi O, Adami J, Lindström D, et al. High body mass index is associated with increased risk of implant dislocation following primary total hip replacement: 2,106 patients followed for up to 8 years. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:141–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Morshed S, Joseph T, et al. Clinical impact of obesity on stability following revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2006;453:142–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernigou P, Trousselier M, Roubineau F, et al. Dual-mobility or constrained liners are more effective than preoperative bariatric surgery in prevention of THA dislocation. Clin Orthop. 2016;474:2202–2210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernigou P, Auregan JC, Potage D, et al. Dual-mobility implants prevent hip dislocation following hip revision in obese patients. Int Orthop. 2017;41:469–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael BS, Dines JS, Akerman M, et al. Long-term followup of total hip arthroplasty in patients with cerebral palsy. Clin Orthop. 2010;468:1845–1854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder K, Hauck C, Wiedenhöfer B, et al. Long-term results of hip arthroplasty in ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy. Int Orthop. 2010;34:335–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin C, Ursu C, Delecourt C. Total hip replacement in young non-ambulatory cerebral palsy patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2016;102:845–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders RJM, Swierstra BA, Goosen JHM. The use of a dual-mobility concept in total hip arthroplasty patients with spastic disorders: no dislocations in a series of ten cases at midterm follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133:1011–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehr RJ, Enneking WF, Scarborough MT. Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop. 1996;(322):207–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolovski VA, Voloshin VP, Aliev MD, et al. Total hip replacement for proximal femoral tumours: our midterm results. Int Orthop. 2006;30:399–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippeau J-M, Durand J-M, Carret J-P, et al. Dual mobility design use in preventing total hip replacement dislocation following tumor resection. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR. 2010;96:2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bus MPA, Szafranski A, Sellevold S, et al. LUMiC® endoprosthetic reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection: short-term results. Clin Orthop. 2017;475:686–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar