Devices to enhance organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

References

• Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: a Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139(10):e56–e528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen MP, Eisenberg MS, Cummins RO, et al. Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a graphic model. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22(11):1652–1658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naim MY, Sutton RM, Friess SH, et al. Blood Pressure- and Coronary Perfusion Pressure-Targeted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves 24-Hour Survival From Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(11):e1111–e1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lautz AJ, Morgan RW, Karlsson M, et al. Hemodynamic-Directed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Neurologic Outcomes and Mitochondrial Function in the Heart and Brain. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(3):e241–e249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friess SH, Sutton RM, French B, et al. Hemodynamic directed CPR improves cerebral perfusion pressure and brain tissue oxygenation. Resuscitation. 2014;85(9):1298–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman L. Toilet Plunger Is the Model For Device to Restart Hearts. New York Times. June 3, 1992:14.
   Google Scholar
• Steen S, Sjöberg T, Olsson P, et al. Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2005;67(1):25–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaisance P, Adnet F, Vicaut E, et al. Benefit of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a prehospital advanced cardiac life support. A randomized multicenter study. Circulation. 1997;95(4):955–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen S, Liao Q, Pierre L, et al. Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2002;55(3):285–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson C, Nestin J, Svensson L, et al. Clinical consequences of the introduction of mechanical chest compression in the EMS system for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-a pilot study. Resuscitation. 2006;71(1):47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smekal D, Johansson J, Huzevka T, et al. A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCASTM device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2011;82(6):702–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311(1):53–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2015;385(9972):947–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SU, Lone AN, Talluri S, et al. Efficacy and safety of mechanical versus manual compression in cardiac arrest - A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2018;130:182–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu N, Chen Q, Jiang Z, et al. A meta-analysis of the resuscitative effects of mechanical and manual chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2019;23(1):100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu M, Shuai Z, Ai J, et al. Mechanical chest compression with LUCAS device does not improve clinical outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(44):e17550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox J, Fiechter R, Gerstl P, et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression CPR under ground ambulance transport conditions. Acute Card Care. 2013;15(1):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gässler H, Ventzke -M-M, Lampl L, et al. Transport with ongoing resuscitation: a comparison between manual and mechanical compression. Emerg Med J EMJ. 2013;30(7):589–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gässler H, Kümmerle S, Ventzke -M-M, et al. Mechanical chest compression: an alternative in helicopter emergency medical services? Intern Emerg Med. 2015;10(6):715–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehatschek G, Muench M, Schenk I, et al. Mechanical LUCAS resuscitation is effective, reduces physical workload and improves mental performance of helicopter teams. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82(4):429–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer H, Neuhold S, Zapletal B, et al. A manually powered mechanical resuscitation device used by a single rescuer: a randomised controlled manikin study. Resuscitation. 2011;82(7):913–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer H, Zapletal B, Neuhold S, et al. Single rescuer exertion using a mechanical resuscitation device: a randomized controlled simulation study. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(11):1242–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogvoll E, Wik L. Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a population-based, prospective randomised clinical trial in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 1999;42(3):163–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarpak L, Truszewski Z, Czyzewski L, et al. CPR using the lifeline ARM mechanical chest compression device: a randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(1):96–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López J, Fernández SN, González R, et al. Comparison between manual and mechanical chest compressions during resuscitation in a pediatric animal model of asphyxial cardiac arrest. PloS One. 2017;12(11):e0188846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzing A, Eichhorn S, Deutsch M-A, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation using electrically driven devices: a review. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(10):E459–E467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudikoff MT, Maughan WL, Effron M, et al. Mechanisms of blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 1980;61(2):345–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halperin HRMD, Guerci ADMD, Chandra NMD, et al. Vest inflation without simultaneous ventilation during cardiac arrest in dogs: improved survival from prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 1986;74(6):1407–1415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halperin HR, Paradis N, Ornato JP, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a novel chest compression device in a porcine model of cardiac arrest: improved hemodynamics and mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(11):2214–2220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa Y, Shiozaki T, Hirose T, et al. Load-distributing-band cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest increases regional cerebral oxygenation: a single-center prospective pilot study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23(1):99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ikeno F, Kaneda H, Hongo Y, et al. Augmentation of tissue perfusion by a novel compression device increases neurologically intact survival in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2006;68(1):109–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timerman S, Cardoso LF, Ramires JAF, et al. Improved hemodynamic performance with a novel chest compression device during treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2004;61(3):273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchateau F-X, Gueye P, Curac S, et al. Effect of the AutoPulse automated band chest compression device on hemodynamics in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(7):1256–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estock JL, Curinga HK, Li A, et al. Comparison of chest compression interruption times across 2 automated devices: a randomized, crossover simulation study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(1):57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong MEH, Ornato JP, Edwards DP, et al. Use of an automated, load-distributing band chest compression device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. JAMA. 2006;295(22):2629–2637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster RW, Beenen LF, Van Der Boom EB, et al. Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(40):3006–3013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casner M, Andersen D, Isaacs SM. The impact of a new CPR assist device on rate of return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prehospital Emerg Care Off J Natl Assoc EMS Physicians Natl Assoc State EMS Dir. 2005;9(1):61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings PA, Harriss L, Bernard S, et al. An automated CPR device compared with standard chest compressions for out-of-hospital resuscitation. BMC Emerg Med. 2012;12(1):8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallstrom A, Rea TD, Sayre MR, et al. Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;295(22):2620–2628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wik L, Olsen J-A, Persse D, et al. Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014;85(6):741–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock Ong ME, Fook-Chong S, Annathurai A, et al. Improved neurologically intact survival with the use of an automated, load-distributing band chest compression device for cardiac arrest presenting to the emergency department. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2012;16(4):R144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurie KG, Voelckel WG, Zielinski T, et al. Improving Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with an Inspiratory Impedance Threshold Valve in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(3):649–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demestiha TD. Use of the impedance threshold device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. World J Cardiol. 2010;2(2):19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aufderheide TP, Pirrallo RG, Provo TA, et al. Clinical evaluation of an inspiratory impedance threshold device during standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(4):734–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaisance P, Lurie KG, Vicaut E, et al. Evaluation of an impedance threshold device in patients receiving active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out of hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2004;61(3):265–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrini L, Beccaria P, Landoni G, et al. Impact of impedance threshold devices on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(5):1625–1632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C-H, Tsai M-S, Chang W-T, et al. Active compression-decompression resuscitation and impedance threshold device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(4):889–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogeris T, Baines CP, Krenz M, et al. Ischemia/Reperfusion. Compr Physiol. 2016;7(1):113–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordy JM, Wengenack TM, Bialobok P, et al. Selective Vulnerability and Early Progression of Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cell Degeneration and GFAP-Positive Astrocyte Reactivity in the Rat Four-Vessel Occlusion Model of Transient Global Ischemia. Exp Neurol. 1993;119(1):128–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar