Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements

References

• American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Particle size-selective sampling for particulate air contaminants. ACGIH, Cincinnati, OH 1999
   Google Scholar
• Antonini JM. Health effects of welding. Crit Rev Toxicol 2003; 33(1)61–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM International. 2006. Terminology for Nanotechnology, E 2456-06, ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Baltensperger, U, Weingartner, E, Burtscher, H, Keskinen, J. 2001. Dynamic mass and surface area measurements. In: PAB Baron, Willeke, K, editors. Aerosol measurement. Principles, techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience. pp 387–418.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, PA, Sorensen, CM, Brockmann, JE. 2001. Nonspherical particle measurements: Shape factors, fractals and fibers. In: PA Baron, Willeke, K, editors. Aerosol measurement. Principles, techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley Interscience. pp 705–749.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, PA, Willeke, K. 2001. Aerosol measurement. Principles, techniques and applications. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer DH, Gijsbers JHJ, Lurvink MWM. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: Exploring sampling techniques and strategies. Ann Occup Hyg 2004; 48(5)439–453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown DM, Wilson MR, MacNee W, Stone V, Donaldson K. Size-dependent proinflammatory effects of ultrafine polystyrene particles: A role for surface area and oxidative stress in the enhanced activity of ultrafines. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2001; 175(3)191–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 1938; 60: 309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 1993. Workplace atmospheres – size fraction determination for measurement of airborne particles, CEN EN 481:1993 Brussels, CEN.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain EAC, Makower AD, Walton WH. New gravimetric dust standards and sampling procedures for British coal mines. Inhaled particles III. Unwin Brothers Ltd, LondonUK 1970
   Google Scholar
• Cohen BS, Li W, Xiong JW, Lippmann M. Detecting H + in ultrafine ambient aerosol using iron nano-film detectors and scanning probe microscopy. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2000; 15(1)80–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dick CAJ, Brown DM, Donaldson K, Stone V. The role of free radicals in the toxic and inflammatory effects of four different ultrafine particle types. Inhal Toxicol 2003; 15(1)39–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockery DW, Pope CA, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferris BG, Speizer FE. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. N Engl J Med 1993; 329(24)1753–1759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockery DW, Speizer FE, Stram DO, Ware JH, Spengler JD, Ferris BG. Effects of inhalable particles on respiratory health of children. Ann Allergy 1989; 139: 587–594
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson K, Li XY, MacNee W. Ultrafine (nanometer) particle mediated lung injury. J Aerosol Sci 1998; 29(5–6)553–560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson K, Stone V, Gilmore PS, Brown DM, MacNee W. Ultrafine particles: Mechanisms of lung injury. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 2000; 358: 2741–2749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder A, Gelein R, Silva V, Feikert T, Opanashuk L, Carter J, Potter R, Maynard A, Finkelstein J, Oberdorster G. Translocation of inhaled ultrafine manganese oxide particles to the central nervous system. Environ Health Perspect 2006; 114(8)1172–1178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Nanotechnology White Paper: External Review Draft, EPA.
   Google Scholar
• Fissan, H, Neumann, S, Trampe, A, Pui, DHY, Shin, WG. 2007. Rationale and principle of an instrument measuring lung deposited nanoparticle surface area. J Nanopart Res, 9((1)):53–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaggeler HW, Baltensperger U, Emmenegger M, Jost DT, Schmidtott A, Haller P, Hofmann M. The epiphaniometer, a new device for continuous aerosol monitoring. J Aerosol Sci 1989; 20(5)557–564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhart, J. 2001. Optical direct-reading techniques: Light intensity systems. In:. P Baron, Willeke, K, editors. Aerosol measurement: Principles, techniques, and applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp 419–454.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2005. Characterizing the potential risks posed by engineered nanoparticles. A first UK government research report. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter D. The diseases of occupations6th edn. Hodder and Stoughton, London 1978
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation (ISO). 1995. Air quality – particle size fraction definitions for health-related sampling, ISO 7708:1995. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation (ISO). 2006. Workplace atmospheres – ultrafine, nanoparticle and nano-structured aerosols – inhalation exposure characterization and assessment, ISO/TR 27628. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Jung H, Kittelson DB. Characterization of aerosol surface area instruments in transition regime. Aerosol Sci Tech 2005; 39: 902–911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller A, Fierz M, Siegmann K, Siegmann HC, Filippov A. Surface science with nanosized particles in a carrier gas. J Vacuum Sci Technol a –Vacuum Surfaces Films 2001; 19(1)1–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreyling WG, Semmler M, Erbe F, Mayer P, Takenaka S, Schulz H, Oberdörster G, Ziesenis A. Translocation of ultrafine insoluble iridium particles from lung epithelium to extrapulmonary organs is size dependent but very low. J Toxicol Env Health Pt A 2002; 65(20)1513–1530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku BK, Maynard AD. Comparing aerosol surface-area measurement of monodisperse ultrafine silver agglomerates using mobility analysis, transmission electron microscopy and diffusion charging. J Aerosol Sci 2005; 36(9)1108–1124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlbusch TAJ, Neumann S, Fissan H. Number size distribution, mass concentration, and particle composition of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 in bag filling areas of carbon black production. J Occup Environ Hyg 2004; 1(10)660–671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lison D, Lardot C, Huaux F, Zanetti G, Fubini B. Influence of particle surface area on the toxicity of insoluble manganese dioxide dusts. Arch Toxicol 1997; 71(12)725–729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNee W, Donaldson K. Mechanism of lung injury caused by PM10 and ultrafine particles with special reference to COPD. Eur Resp J 2003; 21: 47S–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark D, Vincent JH. A new personal sampler for airborne total dust in workplaces. Ann Occup Hyg 1986; 30(1)89–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, AD. 2006. Nanotechnology: A research strategy for addressing risk, PEN 03 Washington DC, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdörster G, Philbert MA, Ryan J, Seaton A, Stone V, Tinkle SS, Tran L, Walker NJ, Warheit DB. Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 2006a; 444(16)267–269
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maynard, AD, Baron, PA. 2004. Aerosols in the industrial environment. In: LS Ruzer, Harley, NH, editors. Aerosols handbook. Measurement, dosimetry and health effects. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp 225–264.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Brown LM. Overview of methods for analysing single ultrafine particles. Philosophical Transact Royal Soc London Ser A – Mathematical Phys Engineering Sci 2000; 358(1775)2593–2609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, AD, Jensen, PA. 2001. Aerosol measurement in the workplace. In: PA Baron, Willeke, K, editors. Aerosol measurement: Principles, techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley Interscience. pp 779–799.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, AD, Ku, BK, Emery, M, Stolzenburg, M, McMurry, PH. 2007. Measuring particle size-dependent physicochemical structure in airborne single walled carbon nanotube agglomerates. J Nanopart Res, 9((1)):85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Kuempel ED. Airborne nanostructured particles and occupational health. J Nanopart Res 2005; 7(6)587–614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCawley MA, Kent MS, Berakis MT. Ultrafine beryllium aerosol as a possible metric for chronic beryllium disease. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2001; 16: 631–638
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mossman B, Churg A. Mechanisms in the pathogenesis of asbestosis and silicosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 1666–1680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2006. Approaches to safe nanotechnology. An information exchange with NIOSH. Updated June 2006, www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech. Atlanta, GA: NIOSH.
   Google Scholar
• National Science and Technology Council (NSET). 2006. Environmental, health and safety research needs for engineered nanoscale materials, Washington DC, Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology, Committee on Technology, NSET.
   Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G. Toxicology of ultrafine particles: In vivo studies. Phil Trans Roy Soc London Series A 2000; 358(1775)2719–2740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G, Gelein RM, Ferin J, Weiss B. Association of particulate air pollution and acute mortality: involvement of ultrafine particles?. Inhal Toxicol 1995; 7: 111–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdörster, G, Maynard, A, Donaldson, K, Castranova, V, Fitzpatrick, J, Ausman, K, Carter, J, Karn, B, Kreyling, W, Lai, D, Olin, S, Monteiro-Riviere, N, Warheit, D, Yang, H. 2005a. Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: Elements of a screening strategy. Part Fiber Toxicol, 2(8): DOI:10.1186/1743-8977-2-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 2005b; 13(117)823–840
   Google Scholar
• Oberdörster G, Sharp Z, Atudorei V, Elder A, Gelein R, Kreyling W, Cox C. Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain. Inhal Toxicol 2004; 16(6–7)437–445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkanen J, Timonen KL, Ruuskanen J, Reponen A, Mirme A. Effects of ultrafine and fine particles in urban air on peak expiratory flow among children with asthmatic symptoms. Environ Res 1997; 74(1)24–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters A, Wichmann HE, Tuch T, Heinrich J, Heyder J. Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles. Am J Respiratory Crit Care Med 1997; 155(4)1376–1383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope CAI, Dockery DW, Spengler JD, Raizenne ME. Respiratory health and PM10 pollution: a daily time series analysis. Am Rev Resp Dis 1991; 144: 668–674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogak SN, Flagan RC, Nguyen HV. The mobility and structure of aerosol agglomerates. Aerosol Sci Technol 1993; 18(1)25–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romieu I, Meneses F, Ruiz S, Sienra JJ, Huerta J, White MC, Etzel RA. Effects of air pollution on the respiratory health of asthmatic children living in Mexico City. Am J Respir Care Med 1996; 154: 300–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal Society and The Royal Academy of Engineering (RS/RAE). 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties, LondonUK: RS/RAE.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz J. Short term fluctuations in air pollution and hospital admissions of the elderly for respiratory disease. Thorax 1995; 50: 531–538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz J, Dockery DW, Neas LM. Is daily mortality associated specifically with fine particles?. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 1996; 46(10)927–939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz J, Slater D, Larson TV, Pierson WE, Koenig JQ. Particulate air pollution and hospital emergency room visits for asthma in Seattle. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147: 826–831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz J, Spix C, Wichmann HE, Malin E. Air pollution and acute respiratory illness in five German communities. Environ Res 1991; 56: 1–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaton A, MacNee W, Donaldson K, Godden D. Particulate air pollution and acute health effects. Lancet 1995; 345: 176–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi JP, Harrison RM, Evans D. Comparison of ambient particle surface area measurement by epiphaniometer and SMPS/APS. Atmos Environ 2001; 35: 6193–6200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, WG, Pui, DHY, Fissan, H, Neumann, S, Trampe, A. 2007. Calibration and numerical simulation of Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (TSI Model 3550 NSAM). J Nanopart Res, 9((1)):61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot JH. A diffraction size-frequency analyser with automatic recording of size-frequency distributions and total and respirable surface areas. J Sci Instrum 1966; 43: 744–749
   Google Scholar
• Talbot JH. Automated dust measurement: The diffraction size-frequency analyser. J Mine Vent Soc S Afr 1967; 20: 21–30
   Google Scholar
• Tran CL, Buchanan D, Cullen RT, Searl A, Jones AD, Donaldson K. Inhalation of poorly soluble particles. II. Influence of particle surface area on inflammation and clearance. Inhalat Toxicol 2000; 12(12)1113–1126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton HW, Vincent JH. Aerosol instrumentation in occupational hygiene: An historical perspective. Aerosol Sci Tech 1998; 28: 417–438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warheit DB, Webb TR, Sayes CM, Colvin VL, Reed KL. Pulmonary instillation studies with nanoscale TiO2 rods and dots in rats: Toxicity is not dependent upon particle size and surface area. Toxicol Sci 2006; 91(1)227–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar