Influence of different growing stages of whole-plant soybeans on their nutrient content and silage quality for cattle

References

• Alvares CA, Stape JL, Senthelhas PC, Gonçalves JLM, Parovek G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Zeitschrift. 22:711–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC International. 2000. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick GA, Kang JH. 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid in vitro media. J Dairy Sci. 63:64–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantoia JR, Capucho E, Garcia TM, Del Valle TA, Campana M, Zilio EMC, Azevedo EB, Morais JPG. 2020. Lemongrass essential oil in sugarcane silage: fermentative profile, losses, chemical composition, and aerobic stability. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 260:114371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casali AO, Dettmann E, Valadares FSC, Pereira JC, Henrique LT, Freitas SC, Paulino MF. 2008. Influência do tempo de incubação e do tamanho de partículas sobre os teores de compostos indigestíveis em alimentos e fezes bovinas obtidos por procedimentos in situ. R Bras Zootec. 37:335–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey KP, Granade PGV, Moyer JL, Anderson DC, Bush LJ. 1995. Nutrient content of silage made from whole-plant soybeans. Prof Anim Sci. 11:74–80.
   Google Scholar
• Dias FJ, Jobim CC, Filho JLS, Bumbieris Junior VH, Poppi EC, Santello GA. 2010. Composição química e perdas totais de matéria seca na silagem de planta de soja. Acta Sci Anim Sci. 32:19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner I, Sudekum KH, Kirchhof S. 2006. Relationships between silage fermentation characteristics and feed intake by dairy cows. Übers Tierernähr. 34:197–221.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr WR, Caviness CE. 1977. Stage of soybean development. Special report 80. Co-operative Extension Service. Ames, Iowa, EUA: Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraretto LF, Goeser JP, Shaver RD. 2017. Case study: fermentation of frozen whole-plant corn silage and high-moisture corn after thawing. Prof Anim Sci. 33:504–508.
   Google Scholar
• Gebrehanna MM, Gordon RJ, Madani A, Vanderzaag AC, Wood JD. 2014. Silage effluent management: a review. J Environ Manage. 143:113–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghizzi LG, Del Valle T,A, Zilio EMC, Sakamoto LY, Marques JA, Dias MS, Nunes AT, Gheller LS, Silva TBP, Grigoletto NTS, et al. 2020. Partial replacement of corn silage with soybean silage on nutriente digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and milk fatty acid profile of dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 266:114526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall MB. 2000. Calculation of non-structural carbohydrate content of feeds that contain non-protein nitrogen. Gainesville: University of Florida. p. A–25. Bulletin 339.
   Google Scholar
• Hintz RW, Albrecht KA. 1994. Dry matter portioning and forage nutritive value of soybean plant components. Agron J. 86:59–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintz RW, Albrecht KA, Oplinger ES. 1992. Yield and quality. Of soybean forage as affected by cultivar and management practices. Agron J. 84:795–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhtanen P, Rinne M, Nousiainen J. 2007. Evaluation of the factors affecting silage intake of dairy cows: a revision of the relative silage dry-matter intake index. Animal. 1:758–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneda T. 1991. Iso- and anteiso-fatty acids in bacteria: biosynthesis, function, and taxonomic significance. Microbiol Rev. 55:288–302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawamoto H, Touno E, Uchino H, Uozumi S. 2013. Comparison of fermentation quality and ruminal degradability between two different harvest timings of forage soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) ensiled with the corn-silage system. Grassl Sci. 59:120–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenward MG, Roger J. 1997. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics. 53:983–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung JL, Shaver RD, Grant RJ, Schmidt RJ. 2018. Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. J Dairy Sci. 101:4020–4033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung JL, Williams P, Schmidt RJ, Hu W. 2008. A blend of essential plant oils used as an additive to alter silage fermentation or used as a feed additive for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 91:4793–4800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung L Jr., Robinson JR, Ranjit NK, Chen JH, Golt CM, Pesek JD. 2000. Microbial populations, fermentation end-products, and aerobic stability of corn silage treated with ammonia or a propionic acid-based preservative. J Dairy Sci. 83:1479–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock AL, Shingield KJ. 2004. Optimising milk composition. In: Kebreab E, Mills J, and Beever DE, editors. Dairying—Using Science to Meet Consumers ‘Needs. The British Society of Animal Science Publication. Vol. 29. Loughborough, UK:Nottingham University Press; p. 107–188.
   Google Scholar
• Mcdonald P, Henderson N, Herson S. 1991. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. Chalcombe, Marlow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Muck RE, Nadeau EMG, McAllister TA, Contreras-Govea FE, Santos MC, Kung L Jr. 2018. Silage review: recent advances and future uses of silage additives. J Dairy Sci. 101:3980–4000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz AE, Holt EC, Weaver RW. 1983. Yield and quality of soybean hay as influenced by stage of growth and plant density 1. Agron Journal. 75:147–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nocek JE. 1988. In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility. A review. J Dairy Sci. 71:2051–2069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oetzel GR. 2007. Herd-level ketosis—Diagnosis and risk factors. Proceedings Preconference Seminar: Dairy Herd Problem Investigation Strategies: Transition Cow Troubleshooting; Vancouver, BC, Canada: Auburn, AL: American Association of Bovine Practitioners; p. 67–91.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira RD, Silva CM, Mielerski F, Lima JSB, Edvan RL. 2016. Harvest growth stages in soybean cultivars intended for silage. Acta Sci - Anim Sci. 4:383–387.
   Google Scholar
• Pahlow G, Ammer RC, Slottner D, Tuori M. 2001. Ensiling of legumes. In: Wilkins RJ, Paul C, editors. Legume silages for animal production – LEGSIL. Braunschweig, Germany: Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL); p. 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Peiretti PG, Meineri G, Longato E, Tassone S. 2017. Nutritive value and fatty acid content of soybean plant [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] during its growth cycle. Ital J Anim Sci. 17:347–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Playne MJ, McDonald P. 1966. The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage. J Sci Food Agric. 17:264–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryce JDA. 1969. Modification of the barker-summerson method for the determination of latic acid. Analyst (Lond). 94:1151–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redfearn DD, Buxton DR, Devine TE. 1999. Sorghum intercropping effects on yield, morphology, and quality of forage soybean. Crop Sci. 39:1380–1384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relling AE, Reynolds CK. 2007. Feeding rumen-inert fats differing in their degree of saturation decreases intake and increases plasma concentrations of gut peptides in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 90:1506–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezende PM, Gris CF, Passos AMA, Evangelista AR, Botrel EP. 2011. Cultivares e estádios de colheita no rendimento forrageiro da soja. Rev Agrogeoambiental. 3:9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rooke JA, Hatfield RD. 2003. Biochemistry of ensiling. In: Buxton DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH, editors. Silage science and technology. Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 1399. Lincoln, USA; p. 45–139.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa LO, Pereira OGP, Ribeiro KG, Valadares Filho SC, Ceco PR. 2020. Chemical composition in soybean silages with inoculant and molasses. Ciênc Anim Bras. 21:e–58211.
   Google Scholar
• Seiter S, Altemose CE, Davis MH. 2004. Forage soybean yield and quality response to plant density and row distance. Agron J. 96:966–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanghero M, Berzaghi P, Fortina R, Masoero F, Rapetti L, Zanfi C, Tassone S, Gallo A, Colombini S, Ferlito JC. 2010. Technical note: precision and accuracy of in vitro digestion of neutral detergent fiber and predicted net energy of lactation content of fibrous feeds. J Dairy Sci. 93:4855–4859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanghero M, Zanfi C, Signor M, Davanzo D, Volpe V, Venerus S. 2015. Effects of plant vegetative stage and field drying time on chemical composition and in vitro ruminal degradation of forage soybean silage. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 200:102–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen RWJ, Gordon FJ, Dawson LER, Park RS, Mayne CS, Agnew RE, Kilpatrick DJ, Porter MG. 1998. Factors affecting the intake of grass silage by cattle and prediction of silage intake. Anim Sci. 66:115–127.
   Google Scholar
• Undersander D, Mertens DR, Thiex N. 1993. Forage analyses procedures. Omaha, USA. p. 154.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson JM, Davies DR. 2012. The aerobic stability of silage: key findings and recent developments. Grass Forage Sci. 68:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolford MK. 1990. A review: the detrimental effects of air on silage. J Appl Bacteriol. 68:101–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar