Inclusion of a Bacillus-based probiotic in non-starch polysaccharides-rich broiler diets

References

• Abd El-Wahab A, Lingens JB, Chuppava B, Ahmed MF, Osman A, Langeheine M, Brehm R, Taube V, Grone R, von Felde A. 2020. Impact of rye inclusion in diets for broilers on performance, litter quality, foot pad health, digesta viscosity, organ traits and intestinal morphology. Sustainability. 12:7753. doi: 10.3390/su12187753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd El‐Wahab A, Visscher C, Beineke A, Beyerbach M, Kamphues J. 2013. Effects of high electrolyte contents in the diet and using floor heating on development and severity of foot pad dermatitis in young turkeys. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 97:39–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01240.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almirall M, Esteve-Garcia E. 1994. Rate of passage of barley diets with chromium oxide: influence of age and poultry strain and effect of β-glucanase supplementation. Poult Sci. 73:1433–1440. doi: 10.3382/ps.0731433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JS, Sunderland R. 2002. Effect of extruder moisture and dryer processing temperature on vitamin C and E and astaxanthin stability. Aquaculture. 207:137–149. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00787-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bederska-Łojewska D, Świątkiewicz S, Arczewska-Włosek A, Schwarz T. 2017. Rye non-starch polysaccharides: their impact on poultry intestinal physiology, nutrients digestibility and performance indices – a review. Ann Anim Sci. 17:351–369. doi: 10.1515/aoas-2016-0090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choct M. 2006. Enzymes for the feed industry: past, present and future. World’s Poult Sci J. 62:5–16. doi: 10.1079/WPS200480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duangnumsawang Y, Zentek J, Goodarzi Boroojeni F. 2021. Development and functional properties of intestinal mucus layer in poultry. Front Immunol. 12:745849. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.745849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellner C, Martínez-Vallespín B, Saliu E-M, Zentek J, Röhe I. 2021. Effects of cereal and protein source on performance, apparent ileal protein digestibility and intestinal characteristics in weaner piglets. Arch Anim Nutr. 75:263–277. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2021.1958647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gericke S, Kurmies B. 1952. Die kolorimetrische Phosphorsäurebestimmung mit Ammonium-Vanadat-Molybdat und ihre Anwendung in der Pflanzenanalyse. Z Pflanzenernaehr Dueng Bodenkd. 59:235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Goodarzi Boroojeni F, Svihus B, von Reichenbach HG, Zentek J. 2016. The effects of hydrothermal processing on feed hygiene, nutrient availability, intestinal microbiota and morphology in poultry—A review. Ani Feed Sci Tech. 220:187–215. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodarzi Boroojeni F, Vahjen W, Männer K, Blanch A, Sandvang D, Zentek J. 2018. Bacillus subtilis in broiler diets with different levels of energy and protein. Poult Sci. 97:3967–3976. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetland H, Choct M, Svihus B. 2004. Role of insoluble non-starch polysaccharides in poultry nutrition. World’s Poult Sci J. 60:415–422. doi: 10.1079/WPS200325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadamus A, Vahjen W, Simon O. 2001. Growth behaviour of a spore forming probiotic strain in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chicken and piglets. Arch Anim Nutr. 54:1–17. doi: 10.1080/17450390109381962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Józefiak D, Rutkowski A, Jensen B, Engberg R. 2007. Effects of dietary inclusion of triticale, rye and wheat and xylanase supplementation on growth performance of broiler chickens and fermentation in the gastrointestinal tract. Ani Feed Sci Tech. 132:79–93. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Józefiak D, Rutkowski A, Martin S. 2004. Carbohydrate fermentation in the avian ceca: a review. Ani Feed Sci Tech. 113:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen KEB. 2014. Fiber and nonstarch polysaccharide content and variation in common crops used in broiler diets. Poult Sci. 93:2380–2393. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-03902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latorre JD, Hernandez-Velasco X, Kogut MH, Vicente JL, Wolfenden R, Wolfenden A, Hargis BM, Kuttappan VA, Tellez G. 2014. Role of a Bacillus subtilis direct-fed microbial on digesta viscosity, bacterial translocation, and bone mineralization in turkey poults fed with a rye-based diet. Front Vet Sci. 1:26. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2014.00026.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latorre JD, Hernandez-Velasco X, Kuttappan VA, Wolfenden RE, Vicente JL, Wolfenden AD, Bielke LR, Prado-Rebolledo OF, Morales E, Hargis BM. 2015. Selection of Bacillus spp. For cellulase and xylanase production as direct-fed microbials to reduce digesta viscosity and Clostridium perfringens proliferation using an in vitro digestive model in different poultry diets. Front Vet Sci. 2:25. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latorre JD, Hernandez-Velasco X, Wolfenden RE, Vicente JL, Wolfenden AD, Menconi A, Bielke LR, Hargis BM, Tellez G. 2016. Evaluation and selection of Bacillus species based on enzyme production, antimicrobial activity, and biofilm synthesis as direct-fed microbial candidates for poultry. Front Vet Sci. 3:95. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lázaro R, García M, Aranibar M, Mateos G. 2003. Effect of enzyme addition to wheat-, barley-and rye-based diets on nutrient digestibility and performance of laying hens. Br Poult Sci. 44:256–265. doi: 10.1080/0007166031000085616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lázaro R, Garcia M, Medel P, Mateos G. 2003. Influence of enzymes on performance and digestive parameters of broilers fed rye-based diets. Poult Sci. 82:132–140. doi: 10.1093/ps/82.1.132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macha M, Taras D, Vahjen W, Arini A, Simon O. 2004. Specific enumeration of the probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 in the intestinal tract and in faeces of piglets and sows. Arch Anim Nutr. 58:443–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagne L, Pluske J, Hampson D. 2003. A review of interactions between dietary fibre and the intestinal mucosa, and their consequences on digestive health in young non-ruminant animals. Ani Feed Sci Tech. 108:95–117. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00163-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murai A, Kitahara K, Terada H, Ueno A, Ohmori Y, Kobayashi M, Horio F. 2018. Ingestion of paddy rice increases intestinal mucin secretion and goblet cell number and prevents dextran sodium sulfate-induced intestinal barrier defect in chickens. Poult Sci. 97:3577–3586. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann K, Bassler R. 2004. Methodenbuch Band III: Die chemischeUntersuchung von Futtermitteln. Melsungen, Germany: Neumann-Neudamm.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmatnejad E, Saki A. 2016. Effect of dietary fibres on small intestine histomorphology and lipid metabolism in young broiler chickens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 100:665–672. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinttilä T, Apajalahti J. 2013. Intestinal microbiota and metabolites—implications for broiler chicken health and performance. J Appl Poult Res. 22:647–658. doi: 10.3382/japr.2013-00742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodehutscord M, Rückert C, Maurer HP, Schenkel H, Schipprack W, Bach Knudsen KE, Schollenberger M, Laux M, Eklund M, Siegert W. 2016. Variation in chemical composition and physical characteristics of cereal grains from different genotypes. Arch Anim Nutr. 70:87–107. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2015.1133111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sella SR, Vandenberghe LP, Soccol CR. 2014. Life cycle and spore resistance of spore-forming Bacillus atrophaeus. Microbiol Res. 169:931–939. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2014.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short F, Gorton P, Wiseman J, Boorman K. 1996. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Ani Feed Sci Tech. 59:215–221. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(95)00916-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulikowska S, Rutkowski A 2018. Recommended allowances and nutritive value of feedstuffs. poultry feeding standards (in Polish). 5th ed. Jabłonna, Poland: The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, PAS, Jabłonna, Polish Branch of WPSA.
   Google Scholar
• Su Y, Liu C, Fang H, Zhang D. 2020. Bacillus subtilis: a universal cell factory for industry, agriculture, biomaterials and medicine. Microb Cell Fact. 19:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01436-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejeda OJ, Kim WK. 2021. Role of dietary fiber in poultry nutrition. Animals. 11:461. doi: 10.3390/ani11020461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsirtsikos P, Fegeros K, Balaskas C, Kominakis A, Mountzouris KC. 2012. Dietary probiotic inclusion level modulates intestinal mucin composition and mucosal morphology in broilers. Poult Sci. 91:1860–1868. eng. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-02005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Krimpen M, Borgijink S, Vastenhouw S, de Bree F, Bossers A, Fabri T, Jansman A, Rebel J, Smits M, van Emous R. 2015. Effects of rye inclusion in grower diets on immunity-related parameters and performance of broilers. Wageningen UR Livestock Research. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/livestock-reports/490689.
   Google Scholar
• VDLUFA. 2003. Handbuch der landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs- und Untersuchungsmethodik, Methodenbuch Band VI - Chemische, physikalische und mikrobiologische Untersuchungsverfahren für Milch, Milchprodukte und Molkereihilfsstoffe. Darmstadt, Germany: VDLUFA-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Welfare Quality Consortium. 2009. Assessment protocol for poultry (broilers, laying hens). Lelystad, The Netherlands. https://edepot.wur.nl/233471.
   Google Scholar
• Zentek J, Goodarzi Boroojeni F. 2020. (Bio) technological processing of poultry and pig feed: impact on the composition, digestibility, anti-nutritional factors and hygiene. Ani Feed Sci Tech. 268:114576. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114576.
   Google Scholar