- An H S, Gordin R, Renner K. Anatomic considerations for plate-screw fixation of the cervical spine. Spine 1991; 16: S548–51
- An H S, Simpson J M, Glover J M, Stephany J. Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion. A prospective multi-center study. Spine 1995; 20: 2211–6
- Edwards C C, II, Heller J G, Murakami H. Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine 2002; 27: 1168–75
- Goulet J A, Senunas L E, DeSilva G L, Greenfield M L. Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop 1997, 339: 76–81
- Graham A W, Swank M L, Kinard R E, Lowery G L, Dials B E. Posterior cervical arthrodesis and stabilization with a lateral mass plate. Clinical and computed tomographic evaluation of lateral mass screw placement and associated complications. Spine 1996; 21: 323–8
- Hase H, Watanabe T, Hirasawa Y, Hashimoto H, Miyamoto T, Chatani K, Kageyama N, Mikami Y. Bilateral open laminoplasty using ceramic laminas for cervical myelopathy. Spine 1991; 16: 1269–76
- Heller J G, Carlson G D, Abitbol J J, Garfin S R. Anatomic comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques for screw placement in the lower cervical spine. Spine 1991; 16: S552–7
- Heller J G, Edwards C C, II, Murakami H, Rodts G E. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine 2001; 26: 1330–6
- Hirabayashi K. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Shujutsu 1978; 32: 1159–63
- Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1983; 8: 693–9
- Hoshi K, Kurokawa T, Nakamura K, Hoshino Y, Saita K, Miyoshi K. Expansive cervical laminoplasties--observations on comparative changes in spinous process lengths following longitudinal laminal divisions using autogenous bone or hydroxyapatite spacers. Spinal Cord 1996; 34: 725–8
- Iizuka H, Iizuka Y, Nakagawa Y, Nakajima T, Toda N, Shimegi A, Tsutsumi S, Takagishi K. Interlaminar bony fusion after cervical laminoplasty: its characteristics and relationship with clinical results. Spine 2006; 31: 644–7
- Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, Ohmori K, Abe Y, Kimura T. Pathomechanism of myelopathy and surgical results of laminoplasty in elderly patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine 2003; 28: 2209–14
- Naito M, Ogata K, Kurose S, Oyama M. Canal-expansive laminoplasty in 83 patients with cervical myelopathy. A comparative study of three different procedures. Int Orthop 1994; 18: 347–51
- Nakano N, Nakano T, Nakano K. Comparison of the results of laminectomy and open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 1988; 13: 792–4
- Nurick S. The pathogenesis of spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 1972; 95: 87–100
- O'Brien M F, Peterson D, Casey A T, Crockard H A. A novel technique for laminoplasty augmentation of spinal canal area using titanium miniplate stabilization. A computerized morphometric analysis. Spine 1996; 21: 474–83
- Oyama M, Hattori S, Noriwaki N. A new method of cervical laminectomy. Chubuseisaisi 1973; 16: 792–4
- Park A E, Heller J G. Outcomes review of laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Curr Opin Orthop 2006; 17: 268–73
- Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, Kawaguchi H, Akune T, Anamizu Y, Kitagawa T, Nakamura K. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 2001; 26: 479–87
- Seybold E A, Baker J A, Criscitiello A A, Ordway N R, Park C K, Connolly P J. Characteristics of unicortical and bicortical lateral mass screws in the cervical spine. Spine 1999; 24: 2397–403
- Tomford W W. Transmission of disease through transplantation of musculoskeletal allografts. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995; 77: 1742–54
- Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Matsuoka T, Miyamoto S, Yonenobu K. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 2001; 26: 1443–7
- Yue W M, Tan C T, Tan S B, Tan S K, Tay B K. Results of cervical laminoplasty and a comparison between single and double trap-door techniques. J Spinal Disord 2000; 13: 329–35
Free access
Open-door laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spon-dylotic myelopathy: Good outcome in 12 patients using suture anchor fixation
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.