1,627
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up

A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014

, , &
Pages 592-599 | Received 04 Mar 2016, Accepted 01 Aug 2016, Published online: 24 Oct 2016

  • Baker P N, Deehan D J, Lees D, Jameson S, Avery P J, Gregg P J, Reed M R. The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2012; 94 (8): 1058–66.
  • Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (1): 45–53.
  • Burnett R S, Barrack R L. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (1): 264–76.
  • Chinnappa J, Chen D B, Harris I A, MacDessi S J. Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific guides: Is there a learning curve? Knee 2015; 22(6): 613–7.
  • Choong P F, Dowsey M M, Stoney J D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (4): 560–9.
  • Cip J, Widemschek M, Luegmair M, Sheinkop M B, Benesch T, Martin A. Conventional versus computer-assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 5-year follow-up of 200 patients in a prospective randomized comparative trial. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (9): 1795–802.
  • de Steiger R N, Liu Y L, Graves S E. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2015; 97 (8): 635–42.
  • Dossett H G, Estrada N A, Swartz G J, LeFevre G W, Kwasman B G. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-b (7): 907–13.
  • Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin L I, Engesæter L B, Vollset S E, Kindseth O. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006; 77 (1): 49–56.
  • Fine J P, Gray R J. A Proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1999; 94 (446): 496–509.
  • Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie S A, Vollset S E, Engesaeter L B, Havelin L I. Early failures among 7,174 primary total knee replacements: a follow-up study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2000. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73 (2): 117–29.
  • Gothesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin L, Petursson G, Furnes O. Short-term outcome of 1,465 computer-navigated primary total knee replacements 2005-2008. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (3): 293–300.
  • Gothesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin L, Petursson G, Lygre S, Ellison P, Hallan G, Furnes O. Survival rates and causes of revision in cemented primary total knee replacement: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2009. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (5): 636–42.
  • Gothesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin L I, Petursson G, Hallan G, Strom E, Dyrhovden G, Furnes O. Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (5): 609–18.
  • Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen M G, Husted H, Troelsen A. What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty? Acta Orthop 2014; 85 (5): 480–7.
  • Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie S A, Vollset S E. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (4): 337–53.
  • Havelin L I, Furnes O, Engesaeter L B, Fenstad A M, Bartz-Johannessen C, Fjeldsgaard K, Wiig O, Dybvik E. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register Annual Report. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register Annual Report. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: Bergen; 2015.
  • Hetaimish B M, Khan M M, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi H H, Bhandari M, Zalzal P K. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (6): 1177–82.
  • Howell S M, Howell S J, Kuznik K T, Cohen J, Hull M L. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (3): 1000–7.
  • Huang N F, Dowsey M M, Ee E, Stoney J D, Babazadeh S, Choong P F. Coronal alignment correlates with outcome after total knee arthroplasty: five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (9): 1737–41.
  • Jeffery R S, Morris R W, Denham R A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73 (5): 709–14.
  • Jenny J Y, Miehlke R K, Giurea A. Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee 2008; 15 (2): 80–4.
  • Namba R, Graves S, Robertsson O, Furnes O, Stea S, Puig-Verdie L, Hoeffel D, Cafri G, Paxton E, Sedrakyan A. International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile non-posterior-stabilized implants. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2014; 96Suppl1: 52–8.
  • Nizard R S, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Vangaver E, Hannouche D, Bizot P, Sedel L. Use of the Cusum technique for evaluation of a CT-based navigation system for total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (425): 180–8.
  • Parratte S, Pagnano M W, Trousdale R T, Berry D J. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2010; 92 (12): 2143–9.
  • Paxton E W, Furnes O, Namba R S, Inacio M C, Fenstad A M, Havelin L I. Comparison of the Norwegian knee arthroplasty register and a United States arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2011; 93Suppl3: 20–30.
  • Rebal B A, Babatunde O M, Lee J H, Geller J A, Patrick D A, Jr., Macaulay W. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty provides superior short term functional outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (5): 938–44.
  • Ritter M A, Davis K E, Meding J B, Pierson J L, Berend M E, Malinzak R A. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2011; 93 (17): 1588–96.
  • Roberts T D, Clatworthy M G, Frampton C M, Young S W. Does computer assisted navigation improve functional outcomes and implant survivability after total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (9 Suppl): 59–63.
  • Ryd L, Albrektsson B E, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, Regner L, Toksvig-Larsen S. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77 (3): 377–83.
  • Schemper M, Smith T L. A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 1996; 17 (4): 343–6.
  • Schisterman E F, Cole S R, Platt R W. Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology 2009; 20 (4): 488–95.
  • Shi J, Wei Y, Wang S, Chen F, Wu J, Huang G, Chen J, Wei L, Xia J. Computer navigation and total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2014; 37 (1): e39–43.
  • Smith B R, Deakin A H, Baines J, Picard F. Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: the learning curve. Comput Aided Surg 2010; 15 (1-3): 40–8.
  • Vanlommel L, Vanlommel J, Claes S, Bellemans J. Slight undercorrection following total knee arthroplasty results in superior clinical outcomes in varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10): 2325–30.