Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 90, 2019 - Issue 5
Journal homepage
2,423
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Yosef TysonSection of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala; ;The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Ola RolfsonThe Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; ;Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
,
Johan KärrholmThe Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; ;Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
,
Nils P HailerSection of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala; ;The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg;
&
Maziar MohaddesThe Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg; ;Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
Pages 421-426 | Published online: 03 Jun 2019

  • Bohm P, Bischel O. The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (420): 148–59.
  • Cnudde P H, Karrholm J, Rolfson O, Timperley A J, Mohaddes M. Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B(4 Suppl. B): 27–32.
  • Della Valle C J, Paprosky W G. The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (420): 55–62.
  • Garbuz D S, Masri B A, Duncan C P, Greidanus N V, Bohm E R, Petrak M J, Della Valle C J, Gross A E. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(2): 351–6.
  • Garellick G, Karrholm J, Lindahl H, Malchau H, Rogmark C, Rolfson O. Svenska Höftprotesregistret Årsrapport 2014. Svenska Höftprotesregistret Årsrapport 2014. Gothenburg; 2015.
  • Ginsel B L, Taher A, Ottley M C, Jayamaha S, Pulle C R, Crawford R W. Hospital mortality after arthroplasty using a cemented stem for displaced femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2014; 22(3): 279–81.
  • Gromov K, Pedersen A B, Overgaard S, Gebuhr P, Malchau H, Troelsen A. Do rerevision rates differ after first-time revision of primary THA with a cemented and cementless femoral component? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(11): 3391–8.
  • Hailer N P, Garellick G, Karrholm J. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (1): 34–41.
  • Hailer N P, Weiss R J, Stark P, Karrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis: an analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(5): 442–8.
  • Hartman C W, Garvin K L. Femoral fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93-A(24): 2311–22.
  • Haydon C M, Mehin R, Burnett S, Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B, McCalden R W, MacDonald S J. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component: results at a mean of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A(6): 1179–85.
  • Herberts P, Ahnfelt L, Malchau H, Stromberg C, Andersson G B. Multicenter clinical trials and their value in assessing total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (249): 48–55.
  • Hernigou P, Dupuys N, Delambre J, Guissou I, Poignard A, Allain J, Flouzat Lachaniette C H. Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision. Int Orthop 2015; 39(4): 639–44.
  • Hultmark P, Karrholm J, Stromberg C, Herberts P, Mose C H, Malchau H. Cemented first-time revisions of the femoral component: prospective 7 to 13 years’ follow-up using second-generation and third-generation technique. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15(5): 551–61.
  • Iorio R, Healy W L, Presutti A H. A prospective outcomes analysis of femoral component fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23(5): 662–9.
  • Karrholm J, Mohaddes M, Odin D, Vinblad J, Rogmark C, Rolfson O. Svenska Höftprotesregistret Årsrapport 2017. Svenska Höftprotesregistret Årsrapport 2017. Gothenburg; 2018.
  • Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lakstein D, Gross A E. Dislocation and infection after revision total hip arthroplasty: comparison between the first and multiply revised total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26(8): 1170–5.
  • Kosashvili Y, Drexler M, Backstein D, Safir O, Lakstein D, Safir A, Chakravertty R, Dwyer T, Gross A. Dislocation after the first and multiple revision total hip arthroplasty: comparison between acetabulum-only, femur-only and both component revision hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg 2014; 57(2): E15–8.
  • Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(4): 780–5.
  • Laaksonen I, Lorimer M, Gromov K, Rolfson O, Makela K T, Graves S E, Malchau H, Mohaddes M. Does the risk of rerevision vary between porous tantalum cups and other cementless designs after revision hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475(12): 3015–22.
  • Lakstein D, Backstein D, Safir O, Kosashvili Y, Gross A E. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(5): 1310–15.
  • Mohaddes M, Garellick G, Karrholm J. Method of fixation does not influence the overall risk of rerevision in first-time cup revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471(12): 3922–31.
  • Mohaddes M, Rolfson O, Karrholm J. Short-term survival of the trabecular metal cup is similar to that of standard cups used in acetabular revision surgery. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(1): 26–31.
  • Mulliken B D, Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B. Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4-to-6-year review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (325): 156–62.
  • Ong K L, Lau E, Suggs J, Kurtz S M, Manley M T. Risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(11): 3070–6.
  • Paprosky W G, Greidanus N V, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (369): 230–42.
  • Parvizi J, Saleh K J, Ragland P S, Pour A E, Mont M A. Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total hip replacement. Acta Orthop 2008; 79(3): 335–41.
  • Patil S, Garbuz D S, Greidanus N V, Masri B A, Duncan C P. Quality of life outcomes in revision vs primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23(4): 550–3.
  • Pelt C E, Madsen W, Erickson J A, Gililland J M, Anderson M B, Peters C L. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular cementless femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(9): 1803–7.
  • Schmale G A, Lachiewicz P F, Kelley S S. Early failure of revision total hip arthroplasty with cemented precoated femoral components: comparison with uncemented components at 2 to 8 years. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15(6): 718–29.
  • Sierra R J, Timperley J A, Gie G A. Contemporary cementing technique and mortality during and after Exeter total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24(3): 325–32.
  • Singh J A, Lewallen D. Age, gender, obesity, and depression are associated with patient-related pain and function outcome after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28(12): 1419–30.
  • Singh J A, Lewallen D G. Operative diagnosis for revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with patient-reported outcomes (PROs). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14: 210.
  • Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P, Johnell O. Are the findings in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register valid? A comparison between the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register, the National Discharge Register, and the National Death Register. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15(7): 884–9.
  • te Stroet M A, Rijnen W H, Gardeniers J W, van Kampen A, Schreurs B W. The outcome of femoral component revision arthroplasty with impaction allograft bone grafting and a cemented polished Exeter stem: a prospective cohort study of 208 revision arthroplasties with a mean follow-up of ten years. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(6): 771–9.
  • Voigt J, Mosier M, Darouiche R. Antibiotics and antiseptics for preventing infection in people receiving revision total hip and knee prostheses: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16(1): 749.
  • Weiss R J, Stark A, Karrholm J. A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2011; 82(2): 136–42.
  • Wetters N G, Murray T G, Moric M, Sporer S M, Paprosky W G, Della Valle C J. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471(2): 410–16.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.