2,321
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Complications and re-revisions after revisions of 528 metal-on-metal hips because of adverse reaction to metal debris

, , &

  • Australian Orthopaedic Association, National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report 2018. https://www.aoa.org.au/docs/default-source/annual-reports/aoa-annual-report-2017-18_web.pdf?sfvrsn=c6dec704 (accessed November 4, 2019).
  • De Smet K A, Van Der Straeten C, Van Orsouw M, Doubi R, Backers K, Grammatopoulos G. Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. Orthop Clin North Am 2011; 42(2): 259–69.
  • de Steiger R N, Miller L N, Prosser G H, Graves S E, Davidson D C, Stanford T E. Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2010; 81(1): 72–6.
  • Depuy Orthopaedics. ASR recall; 2016. https://www.jnjmedicaldevices.com/en-US/news-events/depuy-orthopaedics-voluntarily-recalls-asrtm-hip-system-depuy (accessed November 4, 2019).
  • Eswaramoorthy V K, Biant L C, Field R E. Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91(11): 1454–8.
  • Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kwon Y, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard D J, Murray D W, Gill H S. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91(8): 1019–24.
  • Gross T P, Liu F. Outcomes after revision of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(9 Suppl.): 219–23.
  • Haddad F S, Thakrar R R, Hart A J, Skinner J A, Nargol A V F, Nolan J F, Gill H S, Murray D W, Blom A W, Case C P. Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93(5): 572–9.
  • Hannemann F, Hartmann A, Schmitt J, Lutzner J, Seidler A, Campbell P, Delaunay C P, Drexler H, Ettema H B, Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Huberti H, Knahr K, Kunze J, Langton D J, Lauer W, Learmonth I, Lohmann C H, Morlock M, Wimmer M A, Zagra L, Gunther K P. European multidisciplinary consensus statement on the use and monitoring of metal-on-metal bearings for total hip replacement and hip resurfacing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013; 99(3): 263–71.
  • Hart A J, Sabah S A, Bandi A S, Maggiore P, Tarassoli P, Sampson B, Skinner J A. Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93(10): 1308–13.
  • Jennings J M D P T, White S, Martin J R, Yang C C, Miner T M, Dennis D A. Revisions of modular metal-on-metal THA have a high risk of early complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477(2): 344–50.
  • Lainiala O S, Reito A P, Nieminen J J, Eskelinen A P. Declining revision burden of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34(9): 2058,2064.e1.
  • Liow M H L, Dimitriou D, Tsai T, Kwon Y. Preoperative risk factors associated with poor outcomes of revision surgery for “pseudotumors” in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31(12): 2835–42.
  • Matharu G S, Judge A, Murray D W, Pandit H G. Outcomes following revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris in non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients: analysis of 185 revisions from the national joint registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint Res 2017a; 6 (7): 405–13.
  • Matharu G S, Judge A, Pandit H G, Murray D W. Which factors influence the rate of failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris? An analysis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J 2017b; 99-B(8): 1020–7.
  • Matharu G S, Pandit H G, Murray D W. Poor survivorship and frequent complications at a median of 10 years after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017c; 475 (2): 304–14.
  • Matharu G S, Eskelinen A, Judge A, Pandit H G, Murray D W. Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris. Acta Orthop 2018a; 89(3): 278–88.
  • Matharu G S, Judge A, Murray D W, Pandit H G. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip revision surgery depend on the reason for failure: a propensity score-matched study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018b; 476 (2): 245–58.
  • Matharu G S, Berryman F, Dunlop D J, Revell M P, Judge A, Murray D W, Pandit H G. No threshold exists for recommending revision surgery in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients with adverse reactions to metal debris: a retrospective cohort study of 346 revisions. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34(7): 1483–91.
  • Matthies A K, Skinner J A, Osmani H, Henckel J, Hart A J. Pseudotumors are common in well-positioned low-wearing metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(7): 1895–906.
  • McDonnell S M, Boyce G, Bare J, Young D, Shimmin A J. The incidence of noise generation arising from the large-diameter Delta Motion ceramic total hip bearing. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B(2): 160–5.
  • Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Medical device alert: All metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements: updated advice for follow-up (MDA/2017/018); 2017. https://Assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5954ca1ded915d0baa00009b/MDA-2017-018_Final.pdf (accessed November 4, 2019).
  • Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Medical device alert: All metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements (MDA/2012/036); 2012. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/dts-bs/documents/medicaldevicealert/con155767.pdf (accessed November 4, 2019).
  • Munro J T, Masri B A, Duncan C P, Garbuz D S. High complication rate after revision of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(2): 523–8.
  • National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Island of Man. Annual Report; 2018. https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2015th%20Annual%20Report%202018.pdf (accessed November 4, 2019).
  • Salo P P, Honkanen P B, Ivanova I, Reito A, Pajamaki J, Eskelinen A. High prevalence of noise following delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B(1): 44–50.
  • Shrier I, Platt R W. Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008; 8: 70.
  • Stryker L S, Odum S M, Fehring T K, Springer B D. Revisions of monoblock metal-on-metal THAs have high early complication rates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(2): 469–74.
  • Su E P, Su S L. Surface replacement conversion: tesults depend upon reason for revision. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B(11 Suppl. A): 88–91.
  • US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Metal-on-metal hip implants: information for Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/metal-metal-hip-implants/information-orthopaedic-surgeons. 2019 (accessed November 4, 2019).
  • van Lingen C P, Ettema H B, Bosker B H, Verheyen C C P M. Revision of a single type of large metal head metal-on-metal hip prosthesis. Hip Int 2015; 25(3): 221–6.
  • Wong J M, Liu Y L, Graves S, de Steiger R. What is the re-revision rate after revising a hip resurfacing arthroplasty? Analysis from the AOANJRR. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(11): 3458–64.
  • Wyles C C, Van Demark R E 3rd, Sierra R J, Trousdale R T. High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2014; 472(2): 509–16.