Artificial intelligence implementation in pancreaticobiliary endoscopy

References

• Urban G, Tripathi P, Alkayali T, et al. Deep learning localizes and identifies polyps in real time with 96% accuracy in screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1069–1078.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen PJ, Lin MC, Lai MJ, et al. Accurate classification of diminutive colorectal polyps using computer-aided analysis. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2018;154:568–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo S, Misawa M, Mori Y, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted system improves endoscopic identification of colorectal neoplasms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.009
   Google Scholar
• Zachariah R, Samarasena J, Luba D, et al. Prediction of polyp pathology using convolutional neural networks achieves “resect and discard” thresholds. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:138–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repici A, Badalamenti M, Maselli R, et al. Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2020;159(2):512–520.e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Wu L, Wan X, et al. A novel artificial intelligence system for the assessment of bowel preparation (with video). Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2020;91(2):428–435.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong D, Wu L, Zhang J, et al. Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2020;5:352–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• op den Winkel M, Schirra J, Schulz C, et al. Biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiography: how to tackle the difficult papilla. Dig Dis. 2021;40(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halttunen J, Meisner S, Aabakken L, et al. Difficult cannulation as defined by a prospective study of the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SADE) in 907 ERCPs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:752–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2016;48:657–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Kim J, Choi HS, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted analysis of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography image for identifying ampulla and difficulty of selective cannulation. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2021;11:1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang L, Lu X, Huang X, et al. Intelligent difficulty scoring and assistance system for endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones based on deep learning: multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2021;53:491–498.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim HJ, Choi HS, Park JH, et al. Factors influencing the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:1154–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canto MI, Hruban RH, Fishman EK, et al. Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals: screening for early pancreatic neoplasia (CAPS 3 study). Gastroenterology. 2012;142:796–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signoretti M, Bruno MJ, Zerboni G, et al. Results of surveillance in individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2018;6:489–499.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao L, Zhang J, Liu J, et al. A deep learning-based system for bile duct annotation and station recognition in linear endoscopic ultrasound. EBioMedicine. 2021;65.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhu L, Yao L, et al. Deep learning–based pancreas segmentation and station recognition system in EUS: development and validation of a useful training tool (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92:874–885.e3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goggins M, Overbeek KA, Brand R, et al. Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the international cancer of the pancreas screening (CAPS) consortium. Gut. 2020;69:7–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton ID, Zheng Y, Wiersema MS, et al. Neural network analysis of EUS images to differentiate between pancreatic malignancy and pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:625–629.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozkan M, Cakiroglu M, Kocaman O, et al. Age-based computer-aided diagnosis approach for pancreatic cancer on endoscopic ultrasound images. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016;5:101–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang MM, Yang H, Jin ZD, et al. Differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer from normal tissue with digital imaging processing and pattern recognition based on a support vector machine of EUS images. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2010;72:978–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das A, Nguyen CC, Li F, et al. Digital image analysis of EUS images accurately differentiates pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis and normal tissue. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:861–867.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonozuka R, Itoi T, Nagata N, et al. Deep learning analysis for the detection of pancreatic cancer on endosonographic images: a pilot study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021;28:95–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamamiya A, Irisawa A, Hoshi K, et al. Recent advances in endosonography—elastography: literature review. J Clin Med. 2021;11:10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohno E, Kawashima H, Ishikawa T, et al. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided elastography for solid pancreatic lesions: shear-wave measurements versus strain elastography with histogram analysis. Dig Endosc. 2021;33:629–638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fusaroli P, Napoleon B, Gincul R, et al. The clinical impact of ultrasound contrast agents in EUS: a systematic review according to the levels of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2016;84:587–596.e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita Y, Shimokawa T, Napoléon B, et al. Value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography with enhancement pattern for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Dig Endosc. 2019;31:125–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sǎftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F, et al. Neural network analysis of dynamic sequences of EUS elastography used for the differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1086–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Səftoiu A, Vilmann P, Dietrich CF, et al. Quantitative contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS in differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:59–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasa Y, Iwashita T, Takeuchi Y, et al. Automatic segmentation of pancreatic tumors using deep learning on a video image of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound. J Clin Med. 2021;11:10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Udriştoiu AL, Cazacu IM, Gruionu LG, et al. Real-time computer-aided diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses from endoscopic ultrasound imaging based on a hybrid convolutional and long short-term memory neural network model. Plos One. 2021;16:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kanno A, Miwata T, Nagai H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic sampling for the histopathological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Dig Endosc. 2021;34(3):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Facciorusso A, Barresi L, Cannizzaro R, et al. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in autoimmune pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2021;09:E66–E75.
   Google Scholar
• Marya NB, Powers PD, Chari ST, et al. Utilisation of artificial intelligence for the development of an EUS-convolutional neural network model trained to enhance the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gut. 2021;70:1335–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang S, Stevens T, Kou L, et al. Efficacy of digital single-operator cholangioscopy and factors affecting its accuracy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary stricture. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2020;91:385–393.e1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Almadi MA, Itoi T, Moon JH, et al. Using single-operator cholangioscopy for endoscopic evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures: results from a large multinational registry. Endoscopy. 2020;52:574–582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sethi A, Tyberg A, Slivka A, et al. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) improves interobserver agreement (IOA) and accuracy for evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures: the Monaco classification. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020;56(2):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Cholangioscopy S, Ribeiro T, Saraiva MM, et al. Automatic identification of papillary projections in indeterminate biliary strictures using digital. 2021;1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Saraiva MM, Ribeiro T, Ferreira JPS, et al. Artificial intelligence for automatic diagnosis of biliary stricture malignancy status in single-operator cholangioscopy: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2021:1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.08.027
   Google Scholar
• Elta GH, Enestvedt BK, Sauer BG, et al. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:464–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwahara T, Hara K, Mizuno N, et al. Usefulness of deep learning analysis for the diagnosis of malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2019;10:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machicado JD, Chao WL, Carlyn DE, et al. High performance in risk stratification of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms by confocal laser endomicroscopy image analysis with convolutional neural networks (with video). Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2021;94:78–87.e2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar