An agenda for the second generation of qualitative studies

References

• Axtell, G. (Ed.). (2000). Knowledge, belief and character: Readings in contemporary virtue epistemology. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Benner P. From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA 1984
   Google Scholar
• Benner, P. (Ed.). (1994). Interpretative phenomenology: Embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan R. C., Biklen S. K. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods4th ed. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 2002
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg K., Drew N., Nyström M. Reflective lifeworld research. Studentlitteratur, LundSweden 2001
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DePaul, M., & Zagzebski, L. (Eds). (2002). Intellectual virtue: Perspectives from ethics and epistemology. OxfordEngland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diekelmann, N. L. (Ed.). (2002–2005). Interpretive studies in healthcare and the human sciences (Vols. 1–3). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus H. L., Dreyfus S. E. Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Free Press, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1977). Uses and abuses of multi-attribute and multi-aspect model of decision making. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, University of California at Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Fairweather, A., & Zagzebski, L. (Eds). (2001). Virtue epistemology: Essays in epistemic virtue and responsibility. OxfordEngland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, N. G., & Lee, R. M. (1998). Computer analysis and qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Filstead, W. J. (Ed.). (1970). Qualitative methodology: Firsthand involvement with the social world. Chicago: Markham.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. (1960/1975). Truth and method (G. B. J. Cumming, Trans.). New York: Seabury.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz C. After the fact: Two countries, four decades, one anthropologist. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1955
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi A. Psychology as a human science. Harper & Row, New York 1970a
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi A. Toward phenomenologically based research in psychology. Journal of Phenomonological Psychology 1970b; 1(1)75–98
   Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter, New York 1967
   Google Scholar
• Hallberg, L., & Dahlberg, K. (2005). Guidelines—QHW: The International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Health and Well-Being. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Haverkamp, B., Ponterotto, J. G., & Morrow, S. (2005). Knowledge in context: Qualitative methods in counseling psychology research [Special issue]. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2).
   Google Scholar
• Hookway C. Affective states and epistemic immediacy. Metaphilosophy 2003; 34(1–2)78–96
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Lightfoot S., Davis J. H. The art and science of portraiture. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 1997
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. Handbook of qualitative research2nd ed., N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2000; 163–188
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer B. N., Petras J. W., Reynolds L. T. Symbolic interactionism: Genesis, varieties, and criticism. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1975
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Associates (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Norris C. Epistemology: Key concepts in philosophy. Continuum, London 2005
   Google Scholar
• Patton M. Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods3rd ed. Sage, Newbury Park, CA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne D. E. Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. State University of New York Press, Albany 1983
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne D. E. Practice and the human sciences: The case for a judgment-based practice of care. State University of New York Press, Albany 2004
   Google Scholar
• Schön D. A. The reflective practitioner. Basic Books, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt T. A. Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretation, hermeneutics, and social construction. Handbook of qualitative research2nd ed., N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 2000; 189–213
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Speziale H. J. S., Carpenter D. R. Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative3rd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkens, Philadelphia 2003
   Google Scholar
• Stake R. E. The art of case study research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1995
   Google Scholar
• Steup, N. (Ed.). (2000). Knowledge, truth, and duty: Essays on epistemic justification, responsibility, and virtue. OxfordEngland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, F. J. (Ed.). (1994). The humanistic movement: Recovering the person in psychology. Lake Forth, FL: Gardner.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehurst, G. J. (2003). Evidence-based education. June.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, E. P., & Raush, H. L. (Eds). (1969). Naturalistic viewpoints in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar