A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs)

References

• Fuhrer M J, Jutai J W, Scherer M J, DeRuyter F. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehab 2003; 25(22)1243–1251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF. Author, GenevaSwitzerland 2002, Retrieved 10 May 2006 from http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Lenker J. Evaluating the ICF as a framework for clinical assessment of persons for assistive technology device recommendation. Paper presentation, Advancing a research agenda for ICF: 10th North American Collaborating Center (NACC) Conference on ICF, Halifax, Nova ScotiaCanada, June, 22004, [http://www.icfconference.com/downloads/Sajay Arthanat.pdf]
   Google Scholar
• Craddock G M. The impact of assistive technology on the quality of life and participation, self-esteem and autonomy of students with disabilities transitioning from second level to post second level education. University College Dublin, Ireland, Unpublished doctoral dissertation 2003
   Google Scholar
• Lenker J A, Jutai J W. Assistive technology outcomes research and clinical practice: what role for ICF?. 8th North American Collaborating Center Conference on ICF, Toronto, June, 2 – 42002, Retrieved December 16, 2004 from http://www.icis.ca/cihiweb/en/downloads/icf_jun02_presentations_26_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lenker J A, Scherer M J, Fuhrer M J, Jutai J W, DeRuyter F. Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research. Assist Technol 2005; 17(1)7–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman L A, Scherer M J. Measuring the relationship of assistive technology use, functional status over time, and consumer-therapist perceptions of ATs. Assist Technol 1996; 8(2)103–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Üstün T B, Chaterji S, Bickenbach J, Kastanjsek N, Schnieder M. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehab 2003; 25: 565–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker J A, Paquet V L. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol 2003; 15(1)1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutai J W, Fuhrer M J, Demers L, Scherer M J, DeRuyter F. Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2005; 84(4)294–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonge D M, Rodger S A. Consumer-identified barriers and strategies for optimizing technology use in the workplace. Disabil Rehab: Assist Technol 2006; 1(1-2)79–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijcks B PJ, De Witte L P, Gelderblom G J, Wessels R D, Soede M. Non-use of assistive technology in The Netherlands: A non-issue?. Disabil Rehab: Assist Technol 2006; 1(12)97–102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wielandt T, Mckenna K, Tooth L, Strong J. Factors that predict the post-discharge use of recommended assistive technology (AT). Disabil Rehab: Assist Technol 2006; 1(1-2)29–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kittel A, Di Marco A, Stewart H. Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehab 2002; 24(13)106–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer M J, McKee B G. But will the assistive technology device be used?. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference: Technology for the Next Decade. RESNA, Washington, DC, 1989, 356–357
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M J. Policy issues in evaluating and selecting assistive technology and other resources for persons with disabilities. Bridging gaps: Refining the disability research agenda for rehabilitation and the social sciences. National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Washington, DC 2002
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn S, Fox H R. Evolving legislation and public policy on disability and assistive technology. Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation, M J Scherer. American Psychological Association Books, Washington, DC 2002; 17–28
   Google Scholar
• Craddock G, McCormack L. Delivering an AT service: A client-focused, social and participatory service delivery model in assistive technology in Ireland. Disabil Rehab 2002; 24(13)160–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leininger M. Transcultural nursing: Concepts, theories, research, and practice2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Louise-Bender Pape T, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: A review of personal factors. Disabil Rehab 2002; 24(13)5–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer M J. Living in the state of stuck: How technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities4th ed. Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA 2005
   Google Scholar
• Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services. S L Judge, H P Parette. Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Parette H P, Huer M B, Scherer M. Effects of acculturation on assistive technology service delivery. J Spec Educ Technol 2004; 19(2)31–41, Also available on-line at http://jset.unlv.edu/19.2/parette/first.html
   Google Scholar
• Parette H P, Brotherson M J, Hoge D R, Hostetler S A. Family-centered augmentative and alternative communication issues: Implications across cultures. Paper presented to the International Early Childhood Conference on Children with Special Needs, Phoenix, AZ, 1996
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Lewis M. What is mental retardation? Perceptions from the African American community. Hunter College, New York 1992, Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Misra A. Partnership with multicultural families. Families of students with disabilities, S K Alper, P J Schloss, C N Schloss. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1994; 143–179
   Google Scholar
• Lahm E A, Sizemore L. Factors that influence assistive technology decision-making. J Spec Educ Technol 2002; 17: 15–25
   Google Scholar
• Parette H P, VanBiervliet A, Hourcade J J. Family-centered decision-making in assistive technology. J Spec Educ Technol 2000; 15(1)45–55
   Google Scholar
• Jans L. Use of assistive technology: Findings from national surveys. InfoUse, Berkeley, CA 2000
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Disability. Federal Policy Barriers to Assistive Technology, 31 May 2000 [Retrieved 7 January 2005 from http://www.ncd.gov]
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M J. Connecting to learn: Educational and assistive technology for people with disabilities. American Psychological Association (APA) Books, Washington, DC 2004
   Google Scholar
• Wessels R, Dijcks B, Soede M, Gelderblom G J, De Witte L. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices: A literature overview. Technol Disabil 2003; 15(4)231–238
   Google Scholar
• Brandt A, Iwarsson S, Stahl A. Satisfaction with rollators among community-living users: A follow-up study. Disabil Rehab 2003; 25(7)343–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton A K, Tillotson K M, Main C J, Hollis S. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine 1995; 20(6)722–728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar-Jacob J, Erlen J A, Schlenk E A, Ryan C M, Sereika S M, Doswell W M. Adherence in chronic disease. Ann Rev Nurs Res 2000; 18: 48–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilmore J D, Lash S J, Foster M A, Blosser S L. Adherence to substance abuse treatment: Clinical utility of two MMPI-2 scales. J Personality Assess 2000; 77(3)524–540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leombruni P, Orofino G, Carosella S, Fassino S. Personality profile and adherence in HIV outpatients. Int Conf AIDS. July 7 – 12, 2002, 14:(abstract no. B10557)
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien M K, Petrie K, Raeburn J. Adherence to medication regimens: Updating a complex medical issue. Med Care Rev 1992; 49(4)435–454
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraskowsky L H, Finlayson M. Factors affecting older adults' use of adaptive equipment: Review of the literature. Am J Occupat Ther 2001; 55(3)303–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelands M, Van Oost P, Depoorter A, Buysse A. A social-cognitive model to predict the use of assistive devices for mobility and self-care in elderly people. Gerontologist 2002; 42(1)39–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M J. Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. APA Books, Washington, DC 2002
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M J, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, Cushman L A, Scherer J V. Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehab 2005; 27(21)1321–1331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M J, Glueckauf R. Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehab Psychol 2005; 50(2)132–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar