Use of assistive devices – a reality full of contradictions in elderly persons' everyday life

References

• Sonn U, Grimby G, Svanborg A. Activities of daily living studied longitudinally between 70 and 76 years of age. Disabil Rehabil 1996; 18: 91–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillman B C. Changes in elderly disability rates and the implications for health care utilization and cost. The Millbank Quarterly 2004; 82: 157–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondevik M, Skogstad A. The oldest old and personal activities of daily living. Scand J Caring Sci 1995; 9: 219–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton M P, Nahemow L. Ecology and the aging process. The psychology of adult development and aging, C Eisdorfer, M P Lawton. America Psychology Association, Washington, DC 1973
   Google Scholar
• Cook A M, Hussey S M. Assistive technologies: Principles and practice. 2nd ed. Mosby, St Louise 2002
   Google Scholar
• E Townsend. Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, CAOT Publications ACE. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Janlöv A-C, Hallberg I R, Petersson K. The experience of older people of entering into the phase of asking for public home help – a qualitative study. Int J Soc Welfare 2005; 14: 326–336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agree E M, Freedman V A. Incorporating assistive devices into community-based long-term care. J Aging Health 2000; 12: 426–450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. ICF. 2001, Accessed 10 October 2006 at the website: http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Agree E M. The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 427–443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartke R J, Proshaska T R, Furner S E. Adults and assistive devices. Use, multiple-device use and need. J Aging Health 1998; 10: 99–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings Kraskowsky L, Finlayson M. Factors affecting older adults' use of adaptive equipment: Review of the literature. Am J Occup Ther 2001; 55: 303–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Crean A JM, Westendorp R GJ, Willems C G, Buskens I CM, Gussekloo J. Assistive devices and community-based services among 85-year-old community-dwelling elderly in The Netherlands: Ownership, use, and need for intervention. Disabil Rehabil: Ass Tech 2006; 1: 199–203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Löfquist C, Nygren C, Széman Z, Iwarsson S. Assistive devices among very old people in five European countries. Scan J Occup Ther 2005; 12: 181–192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonn U, Grimby G. Assistive devices in an elderly population studied at 70 and 76 years of age. Disabil Rehabil 1994; 16: 85–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahlin Ivanoff S, Sonn U. Changes in the use of assistive devices among 90-year-old persons. Aging Clin Exp Res 2005; 17: 246–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson I, Berndtsson I, Appleros P, Ahlström G. Lifeworld perspectives on assistive devices: lived experiences of spouses of persons with stroke. Scan J Occup Ther 2005; 12: 159–169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mann W C, Ottenbacher K J, Fraas L, Tomita M, Granger C V. Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly. Arch Fam Med 1999; 8: 210–217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lansley P, McCreadie C, Tinker A. Can adapting to homes of older people and providing assistive technology pay its way?. Age Ageing 2004; 33: 571–576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateni H, Maki B E. Review article. Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands and adverse consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 134–145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Iwarsson I, Ståhl A. Satisfaction with rollators among community-living users: A follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 343–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelands M, Van Oost P, Buysse A, Depoorter A M. Awareness among community-dwelling elderly of assistive devices for mobility and self-care and attitudes towards their use. Soc Sci Med 2002; 54: 1441–1451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggblom – Kronlöf G, Sonn U. Elderly women's way of relating to assistive devices. Tech Disabil 1999; 10: 161–168
   Google Scholar
• Hart D, Bowling A, Ellis M, Silman A. Locomotor disability in very elderly people: value of a programme for screening and provision of aids for daily living. BMJ 1990; 301: 216–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoening H, Taylor D H, Sloan F A. Does assistive technology substitute for personal assistance among the disabled elderly?. Am J Pub Health 2003; 93: 330–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann W C, Llanes C, Justiss M D, Tomita M. Frail older adults' self-report of their most important assistive devices. OTJR: Occupat Participat Health 2004; 24: 4–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agahi N, Lagergren M, Thorslund M, Wånell S-E. Hälsoutveckling och hälsofrämjande insatser påäldre dar. En kunskapssammanställning. [Health development and health promoting efforts in old age. A literature review] Statens Folkhälsoinstitut R 2005:6. Stockholm
   Google Scholar
• Larsson Lund M, Nygård L. Incorporating or resisting assistive devices: Different approaches to achieving a desired occupational self-image. OTJR: Occupat Participat Health 2003; 23: 67–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fänge A, Iwarsson S. Accessibility and usability in housing: Construct validity and implications for research and practice. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 1316–1325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe J W, Kahn R L. The structure of successful aging. Successful aging, J W Rowe, R L Kahn. Pantheon books, New York 1998; 36–58
   Google Scholar
• Copolillo A E. Use of mobility devices: The decision-making process of nine african-american older adults. Occup Ther J Res 2001; 21: 185–200
   Google Scholar
• McMillen A-M, Söderberg S. Disabled persons' experience of dependence on assistive devices. Scan J Occup Ther 2002; 2: 176–183
   Google Scholar
• Pape L-B, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: A review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 5–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin L N, Luborsky M R, Schemm R L. Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive devices use. Gerontologist 1998; 38: 169–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking C. Function or feelings: Factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Tech Disabil 1999; 11: 3–11
   Google Scholar
• Sonn U, Davegårdh H, Lindskog A-C, Steen B. The use and effectiveness of assistive devices in an elderly urban population. Aging Clin Exp Res 1996; 8: 176–182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann W C, Goodall S, Justiss M D, Tomita M. Dissatisfaction and non use of assistive devices among frail elders. Ass Technol 2002; 14: 130–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson B G, Mellström D, Svanborg A. Medical-social intervention in a 70-year-old Swedish population. A general presentation of methodological experience. Comp Gerontol 1987; 1: 49–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svanborg A. A medical-social intervention in a 70-year-old Swedish population: Is it possible to postpone functional decline in ageing?. J Gerontol 1993; 48: 84–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• B Steen. To become old. The Gerontological and geriatric population studies in Göteborg, Sweden (H70) 1971 – 2002. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University. 2004
   Google Scholar
• Sonn U, Hulter Åsberg K. Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly. A study of a population of 76-year-olds in Gothenburg, Sweden. Scand J Rehab Med 1991; 23: 193–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonn U. Longitudinal studies of dependence in daily life activities among elderly persons. Scand J Rehab Med (Suppl.) 1996; 34: 1–35
   Google Scholar
• Altman D G. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning [Qualitative methods in medical research]. Studentlitteratur, Lund 1998
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim U H, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24: 105–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards N I, Jones D A. Ownership and use of assistive devices among older people in the community. Age Aging 1998; 27: 463–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygård L. Dagliga livets aktiviteter [Everyday activities]. Vårdalinstitutets Tematiska rum: Demens. 2004, Accessed 11 January 2007 from the website: http://www.vardalinstitutet.net/documentarchive/1168/1575/1576/3214/4133.pdf?objectId=7329
   Google Scholar
• Östlund B. Gammal är äldst. En studie av teknik i äldre människors liv [Elderly are oldest – a study of technology in elderly peoples everyday life]. Linköping University, Linköping 1995, Dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Lawton M P. Future society and technology. Gerontechnology. A sustainable investment in the future, J Graafmans, V Taipale, N Charness. IOS Press, Amsterdam 1998; 12–22
   Google Scholar
• Östlund B, Stark A, Hagberg J E, Lorentzon P, Hedqvist T. Teknik för hela livet – Äldres behov, teknikers och marknaders utveckling. 100 steg till trygghet och utveckling med en åldrande befolkning. Del 2 [Technique for all ages – the needs of the elderly, development of techniques and markets. In: Future policy for care of the elderly. 100 steps towards security and development with an ageing population. Part 2], Äldre politik för framtiden. SOU. 2003; 91, Accessed 11 January 2007 from the website: http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c4/26/11/fb2a57b1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mann W C. Assistive technology and older adults. OT Practice 2001; 21: 13–15
   Google Scholar
• Jensen L. User perspective on assistive technology in daily life. A qualitative analysis of 55 letters from citizens applying for assistive technology. Queen Margaret University College, Occupational Therapy & Art Therapy, Edinburgh 2005, Master thesis
   Google Scholar
• Hedberg-Kristensson E. Experiences of participation in the prescription process and use of mobility devices in old age. Faculty of Medicine, Lund University. 2006, Leic thesis
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Iwarsson S, Sonn U. Occupational therapy research on assistive technology and physical environmental issues – a literature review. Can J Occup Ther 2003; 73: 109–119
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L. The persons-environment- occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther 1996; 6: 9–23
   Google Scholar
• Hovbrandt P, Fridlund B, Carlsson G. Very old peoples' experiences of occupational performance outside the home: Possibilities and limitations. Scand J Occup Ther 2007; 14: 77–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valdemarsson M, Jernryd E, Iwarsson S. Preferences and frequencies of visits to public facilities in old age – a pilot study in a Swedish town center. Arch Gerontl Geriat 2005; 40: 15–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton D, Seymour W. Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 1851–1862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. Importance of assistive technology outcomes. 2002, Accessed 3 October 2006 from the website: http://www.e-bility.com/articles/at.php.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson D B, Murray G C. Ethics and assistive technology service provision. Disabil Rehabil: Ass Tech 2006; 1: 59–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brewer J, Hunter A. Multimethod research. A synthesis of styles. Saga Publications, Newbury Park, CA 1989
   Google Scholar
• Conneeley A L. Methodological issues in qualitative research for the researcher/practitioner. Br J Occup Ther 2002; 65: 185–190
   Google Scholar