Powered mobility intervention: understanding the position of tool use learning as part of implementing the ALP tool

References

• Jenkins GR, Vogtle LK, Yuen HK. Factors associated with the use of standardized power mobility skills assessments among assistive technology practitioners. Assist Technol. 2015;27:219–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerette P, Tefft D, Furumasu J, et al. Development of a cognitive assessment battery for young children with orthopedic disabilities. Infant-Toddler Intervention Transdiscip J. 1999;9:169–184.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Swuste J, Dupuis DJ, et al. The wheelchair skills test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Miller WC, Routhier F, et al. Effectiveness of a wheelchair skills training program for powered wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:2017–2026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamaraj DC, Dicianno BE, Cooper RA. A participatory approach to develop the power mobility screening tool and the power mobility clinical driving assessment tool. Biomed Res Int. 8 sep 2014 [cited 2016 Aug 18];2014:Volume Article ID 541614, p. 15. http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/541614/.
   Google Scholar
• Hall K, Partnoy J, Tenenbaum S, et al. Power mobility driving training for seniors: a pilot study. Assist Technol. 2005;17:47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler C, Okamoto G, McKay T. Powered mobility for very young disabled children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1983;25:472–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler C. Effects of powered mobility on self-initiated behaviors of very young children with locomotor disability. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 1986;28:325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furumasu J, Guerette P, Tefft D. The development of a powered wheelchair mobility program for young children. Technol Disabil. 1996;5:41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton PW, Kirby RL, Routhier F, et al. Measurement properties of the wheelchair skills test – questionnaire for powered wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:400–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain AD, Kirby RL, Eskes GA, et al. Ability of people with stroke to learn powered wheelchair skills: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:596–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Thornton H. Can patients with unilateral neglect following stroke drive electrically powered wheelchairs? Br J Occup Ther. 2003;66:496–504.
   Google Scholar
• Chase J, Bailey DM. Evaluating the potential for powered mobility. Am J Occup Ther. 1990;44:1125–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldner HA, Logan SW, Galloway JC. Why the time is right for a radical paradigm shift in early powered mobility: the role of powered mobility technology devices, policy and stakeholders. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;11:89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson LM, Eklund M. Driving to learn: powered wheelchair training for those with cognitive disabilities. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2006;13:517–527.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin J. The need for the development of a child led assessment tool for powered mobility users. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:163–171.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin J, Developing powered mobility with children who have multiple and complex disabilities: moving forward [dissertation]. Brighton, UK: University of Brighton; 2006 [cited 2016 Aug 18]. Available from: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.426977.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin J. Discovering powered mobility skills with children: ’responsive partners‘ in learning. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2009;16:331–341.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson LM, Nyberg PJ. Driving to learn: a new concept for training children with profound cognitive disabilities in a powered wheelchair. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:229–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Driving to learn: the process of growing consciousness of tool use: a grounded theory of de-plateauing [dissertation]. Lund, Sweden: University of Lund; 2007 [cited 2016 Aug 18]. p. 122. Faculty of Medicine doctoral dissertation series: 2007:34. Available from: http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/548098.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Eklund M, Nyberg P, et al. Driving to learn in a powered wheelchair: the process of learning joystick use in people with profound cognitive disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65:652–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Durkin J. Assessment of learning powered mobility use – applying grounded theory to occupational performance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51:963–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin J, Nilsson L, Modification and expansion of an assessment tool for powered mobility use. The 4th international interdisciplinary conference on posture and wheeled mobility; 2010 June 7–9 [cited 2016 Aug 18]. Glasgow, Scotland: Posture and Mobility Group, UK. Free Paper AWS3, Abstract 47. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233820050_Modification_and_expansion_of_an_assessment_tool_for_powered_mobility_use.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon LK, Gallagher C, Hammond L, et al. Power mobility training for young children with multiple, severe impairments: a case series. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015;1–16. [E-pub ahead of print].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wästlund E, Sponseller K, Pettersson O, et al. Evaluating gaze-driven power wheelchair with navigation support for persons with disabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52:815–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A, The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA, U.S.A.: The Sociological Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Doing grounded theory. Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA, U.S.A.: The Sociology Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Collins English Dictionary – complete and unabridged tE. Definition of "cognize". The free dictionary. WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection: Farlex. 12th ed. 2014. [cited 2016 Aug 18]. Available from: www.thefreedictionary.com/cognize.
   Google Scholar
• Baber C. Cognitive aspects of tool use. Appl Ergon. 2006;37:3–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaesen K. The cognitive bases of human tool use. Behav Brain Sci. 2012;35:203–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramm HA, Krupa TM, Missiuna CA, et al. Executive functioning: a scoping review of the occupational therapy literature. Can J Occup Ther. 2013;80:131–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen R. The development of problem solving in young children: a critical cognitive skill. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson DI, Campos JJ, Anderson DE, et al. The flip side of perception–action coupling: locomotor experience and the ontogeny of visual–postural coupling. Hum Mov Sci. 2001;20:461–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahrs BA, Lockman JJ. Building tool use from object manipulation: a perception–action perspective. Ecol Psychol. 2014;26:88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutchin MP. Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation-to-environment. Am J Occup Ther. 2004;58:303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugen J, Mathiowetz V, Contemporary task-oriented approach. In: Trombley C, editor. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p. 510–537.
   Google Scholar
• Yeou-Teh L, Gottfried M-K, Newell KM. Qualitative and quantitative change in the dynamics of motor learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006;32:380–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juarez-Collazo NA, Elen J, Clarebout G. Tool use and performance: Relationships between tool- and learner-related characteristics in a computer-based learning environment. Turk Online J Educ Technol – TOJET 2013 [cited 2016 Aug 18];12:330–345. www.tojet.net/articles/v12i2/12231.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G, Mackeogh T. The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:811–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIver D, Fitzsimmons S, Flanagan D. Instructional design as knowledge management: a knowledge-in-practice approach to choosing instructional methods. J Manage Educ. 2016;40:47–75.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson DI, Campos JJ, Witherington DC, et al. The role of locomotion in psychological development. Front Psychol. 2013;4:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontra C, Goldin-Meadow S, Beilock SL. Embodied learning across the life span. Top Cogn Sci. 2012;4:731–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead GH, Mind, self and society. In: Morris CW, editor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G, Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. Philadelphia USA: F.A. Davis Company; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist K, Holmefur M, Ivarsson A-B. Therapeutic use of self as defined by Swedish occupational therapists working with clients with cognitive impairments following acquired brain injury: a Delphi study. Aust Occupat Ther J. 2013;60:48–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L. Driving to Learn a new intervention for people with stroke and spatial neglect. Posture and Mobility Group Journal 2012 [cited 2016 Aug 18];29:15–19. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234008346_Driving_to_Learn_A_new_intervention_for_people_with_stroke_and_spatial_neglect.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson L. Driving to Learn™ in a powered wheelchair: cognitive outcomes for children and adults with neurological disorders. In: Pons LJ, Torricelli D, Pajaro M, editors. Converging clinical and engineering research on neurorehabilitation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 911–915.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres J, Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Yerxa E. Health and the human spirit for occupation. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:412–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M, The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Ikiugu MN, Hoyme AK, Mueller BA, et al. Meaningful occupation clarified: thoughts about the relationship between meaningful and psychologically rewarding occupations. South Afr J Occup Ther. 2015;45:47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts MY, Kaiser AP, Wolfe CE, et al. Effects of the teach-model-coach-review instructional approach on caregiver use of language support strategies and children’s expressive language skills. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57:1851–1869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short J, McCormack J, Copley A. The current practices of speech-language pathologists in providing information to clients with traumatic brain injury. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16:219–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergelson E, Swingley D. Early word comprehension in infants: replication and extension. Lang Learn Dev. 2015;11:369–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernik M, Csibra G. Infants learn enduring functions of novel tools from action demonstrations. J Exp Child Psychol. 2015;130:176–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen J, Dirckinck-Holmfeld L, Danielsen O. Dialogue design – with mutual learning as guiding principle. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2003;15:21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schamess G. Mutual transformation in psychotherapy. Clin Soc Work J. 2012;40:10–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hörmeyer I, Renner G. Confirming and denying in co-construction processes: a case study of an adult with cerebral palsy and two familiar partners. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29:259–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Dunston R, Fowler C, Seeing is believing: an embodied pedagogy of ‘doing partnership’ in child and family health. In: Hager P, Lee A, Reich A, editors. Practice, learning and change: practice-theory perspectives on professional learning: Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2012 [cited 2016 Aug 18]:2012. p. 267–276. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-4774-6_17.
   Google Scholar
• Bailliard AL. Video methodologies in research: unlocking the complexities of occupation. Can J Occup Ther. 2015;82:35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall ET, The dance of life. The other dimension of time. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Using video data in grounded theory research. In: Martin VB, Gynnild A, editors. Grounded theory: the philosophy, method and work of Barney Glaser.: Brown Walker, Florida, U.S.A.; 2012. p. 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Scholes J. Therapeutic use of self: how the critical care nurse uses self to the patient's therapeutic benefit. Nurs Crit Care. 1996;1:60–66.
   Google Scholar
• Mroz T, Pitonyak J, Fogelberg D, et al. Client centeredness and health reform: key issues for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;69:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky L, Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. U.S.A.: Harvard University Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström Y, Sannino A. Whatever happened to process theories of learning? Learn Cult Soc Interact. 2012;1:45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins RJ. Assessment crisis: the absence of assessment FOR learning. The Phi Delta Kappan. 2002;83:758–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King GA, McDougall J, Palisano RJ, et al. Goal attainment scaling. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2000;19:31–52.
   Google Scholar
• Mastos M, Miller K, Eliasson A, et al. Goal-directed training: linking theories of treatment to clinical practice for improved functional activities in daily life. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout JG, Dasgupta N. Mastering one’s destiny: mastery goals promote challenge and success despite social identity threat. Personal Soci Psychol Bull. 2013;39:748–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price OM, Johnsson MC, Hermine Scheeres H, et al. Learning organizational practices that persist, perpetuate and change: a Schatzkian view. In: Hager P, Lee A, Reich A, editors. Practice, learning and change: practice-theory perspectives on professional learning: Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2012 [cited 2016 Aug 18]:2012. p. 233–247. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-4774-6_15.
   Google Scholar
• Henricks TS. Play as self-realization: toward a general theory of play. Am J Play. 2014;6:190–213.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksen BC. Attention on the edge: ability to notice as a necessity in learning, teaching and survival. Visual Inquiry Learn Teach Art. 2016;5:105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon-Rice P, Soto G. Co-construction as a facilitative factor in supporting the personal narratives of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Commun Disord Q. 2011;32:70–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan ME, Yates KA, Inaba K, et al. The use of cognitive task analysis to reveal the instructional limitations of experts in the teaching of procedural skills. Acad Med. 2014;89:811–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field D. Powered mobility: a literature review illustrating the importance of a multifaceted approach. Assist Technol. 1999;11:20–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy P. Powered wheelchair mobility: an occupational performance evolution perspective. Aust Occup Ther J. 2004;51:34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Jarodzka H, Jaarsma T, Boshuizen HPA. In my mind: how situation awareness can facilitate expert performance and foster learning. Med Educ. 2015;49:854–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz MD, Christian M, Endsley PD, et al. Situation awareness in anesthesia: concept and research. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:729–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates E, Dick F. Language, gesture, and the developing brain. Dev Psychobiol. 2002;40:293–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:214–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar