Technology-assisted language intervention for children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing; a pilot study of augmentative and alternative communication for enhancing language development

References

• Delage H, Tuller L. Language development and mild-to-moderate hearing loss: does language normalize with age? J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50:1300–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfenbein JL, Hardin-Jones MA, Davis JM. Oral communication skills of children who are hard of hearing. J Speech Hear Res. 1994;37:216–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitzpatrick EM, Crawford L, Ni A, et al. A descriptive analysis of language and speech skills in 4- to 5-yr-old children with hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2011;32:605–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller MP. Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics 2000;106:E43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehlinger KM, Van Horne AJ, Moeller MP. Grammatical outcomes of 3- and 6-year-old children who are hard of hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56:1701–1714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller MP, Tomblin JB, Yoshinaga-Itano C, et al. Current state of knowledge: language and literacy of children with hearing impairment. Ear Hear. 2007;28:740–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins JE, Bakke M. Technologies for communication: status and trends. In: Marschark M, Spencer PE, editors. Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education. 1. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 425–438.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga-Itano C. Levels of evidence: universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and early hearing detection and intervention systems (EHDI). J Commun Disord. 2004;37:451–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann DC, Worsfold S, Law CM, et al. Reading and communication skills after universal newborn screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94:293–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinzen-Derr J, Wiley S, Choo DI. Impact of early intervention on expressive and receptive language development among young children with permanent hearing loss. Am Ann Deaf. 2011;155:580–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga-Itano C. Early identification, communication modality, and the development of speech and spoken language skills: patterns and considerations. In: Spencer PE, Marschark MS, editors. Advances in the spoken language development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 298–327.
   Google Scholar
• Meinzen-Derr J, Wiley S, Grether S, et al. Functional communication of children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2014;35:197–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinzen-Derr J, Wiley S, Grether S, et al. Children with cochlear implants and developmental disabilities: a language skills study with developmentally matched hearing peers. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:757–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson J, McCann DC, Law CM, et al. The effect of early confirmation of hearing loss on the behaviour in middle childhood of children with bilateral hearing impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RF, Beer J, Kronenberger WG, et al. Contribution of family environment to pediatric cochlear implant users' speech and language outcomes: some preliminary findings. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55:848–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckner JL, Sebald AM, Cooney J, et al. An examination of the evidence-based literacy research in deaf education. Am Ann Deaf. 2005;150:443–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler CB. The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National Norming and Performance Standards for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2000;5:337–348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Convertino CM, Marschark M, Sapere P, et al. Predicting academic success among deaf college students. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2009;14:324–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venail F, Vieu A, Artieres F, et al. Educational and employment achievements in prelingually deaf children who receive cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136:366–372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law J, Garrett Z, Nye C. Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and language delay or disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;CD004110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law J, Garrett Z, Nye C. The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: a meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;47:924–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists in early intervention: Technical report. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cirrin FM, Gillam RB. Language intervention practices for school-age children with spoken language disorders: a systematic review. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2008;39:S110–S137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirrin FM, Schooling TL, Nelson NW, et al. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of different service delivery models on communication outcomes for elementary school-age children. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2010;41:233–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson J, Imrie J. Why do we need randomised controlled trials to assess behavioural interventions? BMJ 1998;316:611–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh J, Binger C. Fundamentals of the ImPAACT Program. ASHA SIG 12 Perspect Augment Alternat Commun. 2013;22:51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Nittrouer S, Sansom E, Low K, et al. Language structures used by kindergartners with cochlear implants: relationship to phonological awareness, lexical knowledge and hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2014;35:506–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31:85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman IL, Steiner VG, Pond RE. Preschool language scales. 5th ed. (PLS-5). San Antonio (TX): Pearson; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Roid G, Miller L. Leiter international performance scale – revised. Wood Dale (IL): Stoelting, Co; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Author. SALT: systematic analysis of language transcripts. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin: Waisman Center, Language Analysis Laboratory; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JF, Andriacchi K, Nockerts A. Assessing language production using SALT software. In: Miller JF, Andriacchi K, Nockerts A, editors. Middleton (WI): SALT Software LLC; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, et al. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998;102:1161–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antia SD, Jones PB, Reed S, et al. Academic status and progress of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in general education classrooms. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2009;14:293–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antia SD, Reed S, Kreimeyer KH. Written language of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in public schools. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005;10:244–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Wendt O. Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: a systematic review. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol/Am Speech-Lang-Hear Assoc. 2008;17:212–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker RM, Akaba S, Brady NC, et al. Support for AAC use in preschool, and growth in language skills, for young children with developmental disabilities. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29:334–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger C, Light J. The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: research review and implications for effective practice. Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24:123–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, Drager K. AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: state of the science and future research directions. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23:204–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light JC, Roberts B, Dimarco R, et al. Augmentative and alternative communication to support receptive and expressive communication for people with autism. J Commun Disord. 1998;31:153–178; quiz 79-80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund SK, Light J. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part I – What is a “good” outcome? Augment Altern Commun. 2006;22:284–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund SK, Light J. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part II – communicative interaction. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevcik RA, Romski MA, Adamson LB. Research directions in augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1323–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady NC, Thiemann-Bourque K, Fleming K, et al. Predicting language outcomes for children learning augmentative and alternative communication: child and environmental factors. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56:1595–1612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski M, Sevcik RA, Barton-Hulsey A, et al. Early intervention and AAC: what a difference 30 years makes? Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31:181–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Augmentative and alternative communication: knowledge and skills for service delivery [Knowledge and Skills] 2002. Available from: www.asha.org/policy.
   Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: a new definition for a new era of communication? Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevcik RA, Romski MA. AAC: More than three decades of growth and development: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; [Internet] [cited 2015 March 22]. Available from: http://www.asha.org/public/speech/disorders/AACThreeDecades/.
   Google Scholar
• Millar DC, Light JC, Schlosser RW. The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006;49:248–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski M, Sevcik RA, Adamson LB, et al. Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53:350–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Jeong SW, Kim LS. AAC intervention using a VOCA for deaf children with multiple disabilities who received cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77:2008–2013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski MPCCCSLP, Sevcik RAP. Augmentative communication and early intervention: myths and realities. Infants Young Children 2005;18:174–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallaudet Research Institute. Regional and national summary report of data from the 2011–12 annual survey of deaf and hard of hearing children and youth. Washington (DC): Gallaudet Research Institute, Gallaudet University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Moores D. Educating the deaf: psychology, principles, and practices. 5th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Flippin M, Reszka S, Watson LR. Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) on communication and speech for children with autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol/Am Speech-Lang-Hear Assoc. 2010;19:178–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz JB, Earles-Vollrath TL, Heath AK, et al. A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012;42:60–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores M, Musgrove K, Renner S, et al. A comparison of communication using the Apple iPad and a picture-based system. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28:74–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allgood MH, Heller KW, Easterbrooks SR, et al. Use of picture dictionaries to promote functional communication in students with deafness and intellectual disabilities. Commun Disord Quarterly 2009;31:53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J, Didden R, Schlosser RW, et al. A review of intervention studies on teaching AAC to individuals who are deaf and blind. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2008;20:71–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis TN, Barnard-Brak L, Dacus S, et al. Aided AAC systems among individuals with hearing loss and disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2010;22:241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar