References
- Disability and rehabilitation. [internet]. World Health Organization. 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 5]. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/en/
- Harniss M, Samant Raja D, Matter R. Assistive technology access and service delivery in resource-limited environments: introduction to a special issue of disability and rehabilitation: assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:267–270.
- Priority assistive products list. [Internet]. Geneva Switzerland WHO Press, World Health Organization. 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 5]. Available from: http://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/low_res_english.pdf
- Relatório Mundial Sobre a Deficiência [internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 5]. Available from: http://www.pessoacomdeficiencia.sp.gov.br/usr/share/documents/RELATORIO_MUNDIAL_COMPLETO.pdf
- Federici S, Scherer MJ. Preface. In: Federici S, Scherer MJ, editors. Assistive technology assessment handbook. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2012. p. xv–xviii.
- Federici S, Meloni F, Borsci S. The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: a survey of National Health Service users. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52:516–526.
- Andrich R, Mathiassen NE, Hoogerwerf EJ. Service delivery systems for assistive techonolgy in Europe: an AAATE/ERASTIN position paper. Technol Disabil. 2013;3:127–146.
- Johnston P, Currie LM, Drynan D, et al. Getting it “right”: how collaborative relationships between people with disabilities and professionals can lead to the acquisition of needed assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:421–431.
- Secretaria do Estado do Direito da Pessoa com Deficiência, Rede de Reabilitação Lucy Montoro. [internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 5]. Available from: http://www.pessoacomdeficiencia.sp.gov.br
- Battistella LR, Juca SS, Tateishi M, et al. Lucy Montoro rehabilitation Network mobile unit: an alternative public healthcare policy. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:309–315.
- World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
- Wessels R, Dijcks B, Soede M, et al. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technol Disabil. 2003;15:231–238.
- Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Demográfico 2010: resultados gerais da amostra [Text on the Internet]. Brasília; c2017 [Cited 2017 Feb 15]. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/resultados_gerais_amostra/default_resultados_gerais_amostra.shtm
- Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5:36–45.
- Bynum HS, Rogers JC. The use and effectiveness of assistive devices possessed by patients seen in home care. OTJR. 1987;7:181–191.
- Mann WC, Hurren D, Tomita M, et al. An analysis of problems with walkers encountered by elderly persons. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 1995;13(2):25–49.
- Riemer-Reiss ML, Wacker RR. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil. 2000;66:44–50.
- Wielandt T, Mckenna K, Tooth L, et al. Factors that predict the post-discharge use of recommended assistive technology (AT). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1:29–40.
- World Health Organization. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less-resourced settings. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
- Costa CR, Ferreira FMRM, Bortoluys MV, et al. Dispositivos de tecnologia assistiva: fatores relacionados ao abandono. Cad Ter Ocup UFSCar. 2015;23:611–624.
- Smith R, Quine S, Anderson J, et al. Assistive devices: self-reported use by older people in Victoria. Aust Health Review. 2002;25:169–177.
- Mukherjee G, Samanta A. Wheelchair charity: a useless benevolence in community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:591–596.
- Federici S, Borsci S. Providing assistive technology in Italy: the perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:22–31.