Exploring assistive technology use to support cognition in college students with histories of mild traumatic brain injury

References

• Kennedy MR, Krause MO, Turkstra LS. An electronic survey about college experiences after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2008;23:511–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hux K, Bush E, Zickefoose S, et al. Exploring the study skills and accommodations used by college student survivors of traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2010;24:13–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todis B, Glang A, Bullis M, et al. Longitudinal investigation of the post-high school transition experiences of adolescents with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011;26:138–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner M, Newman L, Cameto R, et al. After high school: a first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitud. Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Online submission. 2005 April; 190.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen JM. Classroom interventions for students with traumatic brain injuries. Prev School Fail Altern Educ Child Youth. 2005;49:34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Report to Congress on mild traumatic brain injury in the United States: Steps to prevent a serious public health problem. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2003; p. 45.
   Google Scholar
• Hux K, Brown J, Lambert M. Latent class analysis of brain injury symptomatology among college students. Curr Res Concussion. 2017;04: e14–e22.
   Google Scholar
• McCrea M. Mild traumatic brain injury and postconcussion syndrome: the new evidence base for diagnosis and treatment. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mittenberg W, Strauman S. Diagnosis of mild head injury and the postconcussion syndrome. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;15:783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuelson I, Andersson Holmkvist E, Björklund R, et al. Quality of life and post-concussion symptoms in adults after mild traumatic brain injury: a population-based study in western Sweden. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;108:332–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy JD, Cancelliere C, Carroll LJ, et al. Systematic review of self-reported prognosis in adults after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the international collaboration on mild traumatic brain injury prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabilit. 2014;95:S132–S151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown J, Hux K, Schmidt A. College Student health and academic issues relating to brain injury. Poster presented at: American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Convention; 2015 November; Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Krause M, Richards S. Prevalence of traumatic brain injury and access to services in an undergraduate population: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 2014;28:1301–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley CA, Ward AB, Magnay AR, et al. Return to school after brain injury. Arch Dis Childh. 2004;89:136–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich EM, Obrzut JE. Assisting students with a traumatic brain injury in school interventions. Can J School Psychol. 2012;27:291–301.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Hux K, Hey M, et al. Exploring cognitive support use and preference by college students with TBI: a mixed-methods study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41:483–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Wiseman-Hakes C, Douglas J, et al. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part IV: cognitive communication. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29:353–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffatt K, McGrenere J, Purves B, Klawe M. The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with aphasia. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems; 2004 Apr 25; Nicosia, Cyprus: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lasker J, Bedrosian J. Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders. Augment Altern Commun. 2001;17:141–153.
   Google Scholar
• Martella RC, Nelson JR, Morgan RL, et al. Understanding and interpreting educational research. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bazarian JJ, Mcclung J, Shah MN, et al. Mild traumatic brain injury in the United States, 1998–2000. Brain Inj. 2005;19:85–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, et al. Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1637–1640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognitive linguistic quick test: CLQT. San Antonio (TX): PsychCorp; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen GM, Gwyer J, Shepard KF. Expert practice in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2000;80:28–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claes C, Van Hove G, Vandevelde S, et al. Person-centered planning: analysis of research and effectiveness. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010;48:432–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagner D, Helm DT, Butterworth J. “This is your meeting: a qualitative study of person-centered planning”: Ment Retard. 1996;34:159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyle O’Brien C, O’Brien J, Mount B. Person-centered planning has arrived… or has it? Ment Retard. 1997;35:480–484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steere DE. Using person-centered planning to address personal quality of life. Qual Life. 1997;2:5.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien CL, O’Brien J. The origins of person-centered planning: a community of practice perspective. In: Holburn S, Vietze P, editors. Person-centered planning: Research, practice, and future directions. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 2000. p. 2–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rose D. Universal design for learning. J Spec Educ Technol. 2000;15:47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mace R. What is universal design. The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University. [cited 1997 Nov 5]. Available from: https://www.uwyo.edu/wind/_files/docs/resources/ud_review.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pisha B, Coyne P. Smart from the start: The promise of universal design for learning. Remed Spec Educ. 2001;22:197–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott SS, Mcguire JM, Shaw SF. Universal design for instruction: a new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education. Remed Spec Educ. 2003;24:369–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver P, Bourke A, Strehorn KC. Universal instructional design in higher education: an approach for inclusion. Equity Excell Educ. 1998;31:47–51.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister TW, Arciniegas D. Evaluation and treatment of postconcussive symptoms. NeuroRehabilitation. 2002;17:265–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th international conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:250–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrzejewski SJ, Moore CM, Corvette M, et al. Prospective memory skill. Bull Psychon Soc. 1991;29:304–306.
   Google Scholar
• Kvavilashvili L. Remembering intention as a distinct form of memory. Br J Psychol. 1987;78:507–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley SR, McDaniel MA, Pedroza C, et al. Incentive effects on event-based prospective memory performance in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2009;23:201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar