References
- Weiss PL, Kizony R, Feintuch U, et al. Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation. Textbook Neural Repair Rehabil. 2006;51:182–197.
- Joo LY, Yin TS, Xu D, et al. A feasibility study using interactive commercial off-the-shelf computer gaming in upper limb rehabilitation in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:437–441.
- Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2015;43:e20–e21.
- Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke. 2010;41:1477–1484.
- Yavuzer G, Senel A, Atay M, et al. ''Playstation eyetoy games'' improve upper extremity-related motor functioning in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44:237–244.
- Lang CE, Lohse KR, Birkenmeier RL. Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation: prescribing motor therapy after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2015;28:549–555.
- Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Gnip C. Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:3–10.
- Traicoff K. Meaningful engagement in activity can enhance upper extremity motor performance more than rote exercise in stroke rehabilitation. Phys Funct CATs. 2008;20.
- Levac DE, Miller PA. Integrating virtual reality video games into practice: clinicians' experiences. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013;29:504–512.
- Hughes A-M, Burridge JH, Demain SH, et al. Translation of evidence-based assistive technologies into stroke rehabilitation: users’ perceptions of the barriers and opportunities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:1.
- Levac D, Espy D, Fox E, et al. “Kinect-ing” with clinicians: a knowledge translation resource to support decision making about video game use in rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2014;95:426–440.
- Levac DE, Galvin J. Facilitating clinical decision-making about the use of virtual reality within paediatric motor rehabilitation: application of a classification framework. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14:177–184.
- Hochstenbach-Waelen A, Seelen HA. Embracing change: practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:1.
- Norman KD, Yvonna SL. Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. Chapter 7. In: Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 118–137.
- Jintronix.com [Internet]. Montreal, Canada: Jintronix; [cited 2018 Feb 23]. Available from: http://www.jintronix.com
- Gaming F. HandTutor offers enhanced functional and fine motor rehabilitation of the hand. Fitness Gaming; 2016.
- Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 2003;27:425–478.
- Sabatier P. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. J Public Policy. 1986;6:21–48.
- Griffin RW, Moorhead G. Organizational behavior: managing people and organizations. Toronto: Nelson Education; 2011. 640 p.
- Shapi’i A, Mat Zin NA, Elaklouk AM. A game system for cognitive rehabilitation. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:493562.
- Vakhnina N, Nikitina LY, Parfenov V, et al. Post-stroke cognitive impairments. Neurosci Behav Phys. 2009;39:719–724.
- Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly. 1989;13:319–340.