A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the provision and use of low-tech and unaided AAC systems for people with complex communication needs and their families

References

• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dykstra AD, Hakel ME, Adams SG. Application of the ICF in reduced speech intelligibility in dysarthria. Semin Speech Lang. 2007;28:301–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Virgo R, Olsson C, et al. Activity participation of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities and typically-developing peers. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14:145–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehy K, Budiyanto K. Teachers’ attitudes to signing for children with severe learning disabilities in Indonesia. Int J Inclusive Educ. 2014;18:1143–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirumanickam A, Raghavendra P, Olsson C. Participation and social networks of school-age children with complex communication needs: A descriptive study. Augment Altern Commun. 2011;27:195–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. 4th ed. Baltimore: Brookes Pub; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke M, Price K, Griffiths T. Augmentative and alternative communication for children with cerebral palsy. Paediatr Child Health. 2012;22:367–371.
   Google Scholar
• Porter G. Integrating AAC into programs applying the principles of conductive education. Conduct Educ News. 1997;12:2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Speech Pathology Australia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication Clinical Guideline. Melbourne, Australia: The Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Costantino MA, Bonati M. A scoping review of interventions to supplement spoken communication for children with limited speech or language skills. PLoS One. 2014 2014;9:e90744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JM, Inglebret E, Jones C, et al. Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2006;22:85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter S, Enderby P, Evans P, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the use of high‐technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47:115–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parette H, Brotherson M, Huer M. Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Educ Train Ment Retard DevDisabil. 2000;35:177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp C, Draucker CB, Ellett MLC. Barriers and facilitators to children's use of speech-generating devices: a descriptive qualitative study of mothers’ perspectives. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2014;19:229–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke M, McConachie H, Price K, et al. Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2001;36:107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong L, Jans D, MacDonald A. Parkinson's disease and aided AAC: Some evidence from practice. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000;35:377–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW. Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews. FOCUS Technical Brief. 2007;17. Available from http://www.ncddr.org/kt/products/focus/focus7/
   Google Scholar
• Butler A, Hall H, Copnell B. A guide to writing a qualitative systematic review protocol to enhance evidence‐based practice in nursing and health care. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing. 2016;13:241–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28:197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay S. Child and youth experiences and perspectives of cerebral palsy: A qualitative systematic review. Child. Care Health Dev. 2016;42:153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Balandin S, Hemsley B, et al. Facilitated communication and authorship: a systematic review. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30:359–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative research checklist. Oxford: CASP; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) systematic review checklist. Oxford: CASP; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, Bennett S, Del Mar C. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. 2nd ed. Chatswood, N.S.W.: Elsevier Australia; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nye E, Melendez-Torres GJ, Bonell C. Origins, methods and advances in qualitative meta‐synthesis. Rev Educ. 2016;4:57–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Wendt O, Sigafoos J. Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. EBCAI 2007;1:138–150.
   Google Scholar
• Saini M, Shlonsky A. Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver SR, Rees RW, Clarke, ‐et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expect. 2008;11:72–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melendez-Torres GJ, Grant S, Bonell C. A systematic review and critical appraisal of qualitative metasynthetic practice in public health to develop a taxonomy of operations of reciprocal translation. Res Syn Meth. 2015;6:357–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31:85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Bornman J, Granlund M, et al. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Implications for clinical and research practice in the field of augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: ICF; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) 2017 [cited 2017 Apr 26]. Available from: http://www.asha.org/slp/icf/
   Google Scholar
• Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balandin S, Hemsley B, Sigafoos J, et al. Communicating with nurses: The experiences of 10 individuals with an acquired severe communication impairment. Brain Impairment. 2001;2:109–118.
   Google Scholar
• San PH, Abdullah AC. The implementation of picture exchange communication system: A mother's perspective of a young child with Pervasive Developmental Disorder. Pertanika J Soc Sci Hum 2013;21:1543–1553.
   Google Scholar
• Goldbart J, Marshall J. ‘Pushes and pulls’ on the parents of children who use AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2004;20:194–208.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Goldbart J. “Communication is everything I think.” Parenting a child who needs Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008;43:77–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines M, Balandin S, Togher L. Communication and AAC in the lives of adults with autism: The stories of their older parents. Augment Altern Commun. 2011;27:256–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J. ‘I prefer contact this close’: perceptions of AAC by people with motor neurone disease and their communication partners. Augment Altern Commun. 2004;20:259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson MB, Carlsson M, Sonnander K. Communication difficulties and the use of communication strategies: from the perspective of individuals with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47:144–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balandin S, Hemsley B, Sigafoos J, et al. Communicating with nurses: the experiences of 10 adults with cerebral palsy and complex communication needs. Appl Nurs Res. 2007;20:56–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley B, Balandin S. Without AAC: the stories of unpaid carers of adults with Cerebral Palsy and complex communication needs in hospital. Augment Altern Commun. 2004;20:243–258.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley B, Kuek M, Bastock K, et al. Parents and children with cerebral palsy discuss communication needs in hospital. Dev Neurorehabil. 2013;16:363–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund SK, Light J. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III - contributing factors. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23:323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso K, Markström A, Idvall M, et al. Communication experience of individuals treated with home mechanical ventilation. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011;46:686–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin AM, Connor-Fenelon MO, Lyons R. Non-verbal communication between Registered Nurses Intellectual Disability and people with an intellectual disability: an exploratory study of the nurse's experiences. Part 2. J Intellect Disabil. 2012;16:97–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindsay S. Perceptions of health care workers prescribing augmentative and alternative communication devices to children. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:209–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oommen ER, McCarthy JW. Simultaneous natural speech and AAC interventions for children with childhood apraxia of speech: lessons from a speech-language pathologist focus group. Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31:63–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bortoli T, Arthur-Kelly M, Mathisen B, et al. Speech-language pathologists' perceptions of implementing communication intervention with students with multiple and severe disabilities. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30:55–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormnaes S, Malek YA. Egyptian speech therapists want more knowledge about augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2004;20:30–41.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstock L, Wright J. Collaborative implementation: working together when using graphic symbols. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2011;27:331–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trembath D, Iacono T, Lyon K, et al. Augmentative and alternative communication supports for adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism 2014;18:891–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato C, Shane HC, Hemsley B. Exploring the feasibility of the visual language in autism program for children in an early intervention group setting: views of parents, educators, and health professionals. Dev Neurorehabil. 2014; Apr17:115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley B, Lee S, Munro K, et al. Supporting communication for children with cerebral palsy in hospital: views of community and hospital staff. Dev Neurorehabil. 2014;17:156–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono T, Cameron M. Australian speech-language pathologists' perceptions and experiences of augmentative and alternative communication in early childhood intervention. Augment Altern Commun. 2009;25:236–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger C, Kent-Walsh J, Berens J, et al. Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24:323–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson J, Dowrick M. Parents' perspectives on the communication skills of their children with severe disabilities. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2005;30:75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickl G. Communication intervention in children with severe disabilities and multilingual backgrounds: perceptions of pedagogues and parents. Augment Altern Commun. 2011;27:229–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady N, Skinner D, Roberts J, et al. Communication in young children with fragile X syndrome: a qualitative study of mothers' perspectives. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006;15:353–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Mathew SN, Lloyd LL. Insights into communication intervention and AAC in South India: a mixed-methods study. Commun. Disord Q. 2011;32:232–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey M, Evans DL, Kawai N, et al. Communication styles of persons with ALS as recounted by surviving partners. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28:232–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calculator SN. Use of enhanced natural gestures to foster interactions between children with Angelman syndrome and their parents. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2002;11:340–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson A, Kristoffersson L, Ferm U, et al. The comalong communication boards: parents’ use and experiences of aided language stimulation. Augment Altern Commun. 2011;27:103–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoner JB, Parette HP, Watts EH, et al. Preschool Teacher Perceptions of Assistive Technology and Professional Development Responses. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 2008;43:77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono T, Lyon K, Johnson H, et al. Experiences of adults with complex communication needs receiving and using low tech AAC: an Australian context. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8:392–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay S, Nwaogu P. Barriers to teaching non-speaking learners with intellectual disabilities and their impact on the provision of augmentative and alternative communication. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 2009;56:349–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley B, Balandin S, Worrall L. Nursing the patient with complex communication needs: time as a barrier and a facilitator to successful communication in hospital. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68:116–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg S, Agius M, Agius L. A user and their family's perspective of the use of a low-tech vs a high-tech AAC system. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;217:811–818.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serpentine EC, Tarnai B, Drager KD, et al. Decision making of parents of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder concerning augmentative and alternative communication in Hungary. Commun Disord Q. 2011;32:221–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni SS, Parmar J. Culturally and linguistically diverse student and family perspectives of AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33:170–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell-Johns J, Mendez JL, Smith BH. Evidence-based solutions for overcoming access barriers, decreasing attrition, and promoting change with underserved families. J Fam Psychol. 2004;18:19–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger C, Ball L, Dietz A, et al. Personnel roles in the AAC assessment process. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28:278–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Alcántara M, García-Caro MP, Laynez-Rubio C, et al. Feelings of loss in parents of children with infantile cerebral palsy. Disability and Health Journal. 2015;8:93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernańdez-Alcántara M, García-Caro MP, Pérez-Marfil MN, et al. Feelings of loss and grief in parents of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [Article]. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;55:312–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginson J, Matthewson M. Working therapeutically with parents after the diagnosis of a child's cerebral palsy: issues and practice guidelines. Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling. 2014;20:50–66.
   Google Scholar
• Costigan FA, Light J. A review of preservice training in augmentative and alternative communication for speech-language pathologists, special education teachers, and occupational therapists. Assist Technol. 2010;22:200–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz A, Quach W, Lund SK, et al. AAC assessment and clinical-decision making: the impact of experience [Article]. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28:148–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin L, Montano J, Fusco L, et al. Speech-language pathologists’ perceptions of their training and experience in using alternative and augmentative communication. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders 2003;30:76–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliff A, Koul R, Lloyd LL. Preparation in augmentative and alternative communication: an update for speech-language pathology training. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17:48–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli G, Pazzaglia M. Novel perspectives on health professionals’ attitudes to disability. Med Educ. 2016;50:804–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy J, Light J. Attitudes toward individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: research review. Augment Altern Commun. 2005;21:41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewstone M, Swart H. Fifty-odd years of inter-group contact: from hypothesis to integrated theory. Br J Soc Psychol. 2011;50:374–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maudsley G, Strivens J. Promoting professional knowledge, experiential learning and critical thinking for medical students. Med Educ. 2000; Jul34:535–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields N, Taylor NF. Contact with young adults with disability led to a positive change in attitudes toward disability among physiotherapy students. Physiother Can. 2014;66:298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balandin S, Hines M. The involvement of people with lifelong disability and communication impairment in lecturing to speech-language pathology students. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13:436–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster S. Saying the ‘F word in the nicest possible way’: augmentative communication and discourses of disability. Disability & Society. 2013;28:125–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager K, Light J, Fallon K, et al. The performance of typically developing 2 1/2-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46:298–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trembath D, Balandin S, Togher L. Vocabulary selection for Australian children who use augmentative and alternative communication. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2007;32:291–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worah S, McNaughton D, Light J, et al. A comparison of two approaches for representing AAC vocabulary for young children. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17:460–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, Page R, Curran J, et al. Children's ideas for the design of AAC assistive technologies for young children with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23:274–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecrow C, Beckwith J, Klee T. An exploratory trial of the effectiveness of an enhanced consultative approach to delivering speech and language intervention in schools. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010;45:354–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddihough DS, Meehan E, Stott NS, et al. The National Disability Insurance Scheme: a time for real change in Australia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:66–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce SM, Trief E, Cascella PW. Teachers’ and speech-language pathologists’ perceptions about a tangible symbols intervention: efficacy, generalization, and recommendations. Augment Altern Commun. 2011;27:172–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung YC, Stoner JB. A meta-synthesis of team members’ voices: what we need and what we do to support students who use AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2016;32:175–186. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2016.1213766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke EH, Light J, Kitko L. A systematic review of the effectiveness of nurse communication with patients with complex communication needs with a focus on the use of augmentative and alternative communication. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:2102–2115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel R, Khamis-Dakwar R. An AAC training program for special education teachers: a case study of Palestinian Arab teachers in Israel. Augment Altern Commun. 2005;21:205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MM, Connolly I. Roles of aided communication: perspectives of adults who use AAC. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2008;3:260–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar