“Now I am a techie too” – parental perceptions of using mobile technology for communication by children with complex communication needs in the Global South

References

• Bridges SJ. Multicultural issues in augmentative and alternative communication and language: Research to Practice. Top Lang Disorders. 2004; 24(1): 62-75.
   Google Scholar
• Childwise. Report: Trends in media use, research highlights for children's online safety 50. 2013. Available from: http://www.saferinternet.org.uk/content/childnet/safterinternetcentre/downloads/Research_Highlights/UKCCIS_RH50_Childwise_Trends_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Joginder Singh S, Hussein NH, Kamal RM, et al. Reflections of Malaysian parents of children with developmental disabilities on their experiences with AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33:110–120.
   Google Scholar
• McCord MS, Soto G. Perceptions of AAC: an ethnographic investigation of Mexican American families. Augment Altern Commun. 2004;20:209–227.
   Google Scholar
• Binger C, Kent-Walsh J, Berens J, et al. Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24:323–328.
   Google Scholar
• Gona JK, Newton CR, Hartley S, et al. A home-based intervention using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) techniques in rural Kenya: what are the caregivers; experiences? Child Care Health Dev. 2014;40:29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Huer M, Parette H, Saenz T. Conversations with Mexican Americans regarding children with disabilities and AAC. Commun Disord Q. 2001;224:197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund M, Bjorck-Akesson E, Wilder J, et al. AAC interventions for children in a family environment: implementing evidence in practice. Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24:207–219.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Goldbart J. ‘Communication is everything I think.’ Parenting a child who needs Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008;43:77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Parette HP, Brotherson MJ, Huer MB. Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Educ Train Ment Retard Dev Disabil. 2000;35:177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Pickl G. Communication intervention in children with severe disabilities and multilingual backgrounds: perceptions of pedagogues and parents. Augment Altern Commun. 2011;27:229–244.
   Google Scholar
• Romski MA, Sevcik RA, Adamson LB, et al. Randomised comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53:350–364.
   Google Scholar
• Smith AL, Barton-Hulsey A, Nwosu N. AAC and families: dispelling myths and empowering parents. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2016;1:10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Soto G. Training partners in AAC in culturally diverse families. Perspect Augment Altern Commun. 2012;21:144–150.
   Google Scholar
• Parette HP, Huer MB. Working with Asian American families whose children have augmentative and alternative communication needs. J Spec Educ Technol. 2002;17:5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: past, present, and future challenges. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28:197–204.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Light J. The iPad and mobile technology revolution: benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29:107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Meder AM, Wegner JR. iPads, mobile technologies, and communication applications: a survey of family wants, needs, and preferences. Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31:27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rummel-Hudson R. A revolution at their fingertips. Perspect Augment Altern Commun. 2011;20:19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Derry K, Marina K, Savage C. Parents’ and speech-language pathologists’ perceptions of children’s communication skills using a tablet with communication app. Toronto, Canada: ISAAC Conference; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gosnell J. Apps: an emerging tool for SLPs: a plethora of apps can be used to develop expressive, receptive, and other language skills. The ASHA Lead. 2011;16:10–13. Available from: http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2011/111011/Apps-An-Emerging-Tool-for-SLPs.htm
   Google Scholar
• Allen ML, Hartley C, Cain K. iPads and the use of “apps” by children with autism spectrum disorder: do they promote learning? Front Psychol. 2016;7:1305–1311.
   Google Scholar
• Lofland KB. The use of technology in the treatment of autism. In: Cardon TA, editor. Technology and the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Sennott S, Bowker A. Autism, AAC, and proloquo2Go. Perspect Augment Altern Commun. 2009;18:137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Clark MI, Austin DW, Craike MJ. Professional and parental attitudes toward iPad application use in autism spectrum disorder. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 2015;30:174–181.
   Google Scholar
• Lorah ER, Tincani M, Dodge J, et al. Evaluating picture exchange and the iPadTM as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2013;25:637–649.
   Google Scholar
• Lorah ER, Parnell A, Whitby PS, et al. A systematic review of tablet computers and portable media players as speech generating devices for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45:3792–3804.
   Google Scholar
• Allen AA, Shane HC. Autism spectrum disorders in the era of mobile technologies: impact on caregivers. Dev Neurorehabil. 2014;17:110–114.
   Google Scholar
• Allen AA, Jeans C, Ball LJ, et al. Caregivers’ perception of the IPad’s utility for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): a conflict between illusion and reality. World J Educ Res. 2015;2:39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cardon TA, Wilcox MJ, Campbell PH. Caregiver perspectives about assistive technology use with their young children with autism spectrum disorders. Infant Young Child. 2011;24:153–173.
   Google Scholar
• Flores M, Musgrove K, Renner S, et al. A comparison of communication using the Apple iPad and a picture-based system. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28:74–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kagohara D, van der Meer L, Ramdoss S, et al. Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso DCC. The fast-paced iPad revolution: can educators stay up to date and relevant about these ubiquitous devices? Br J Educ Technol. 2012;43:125–127.
   Google Scholar
• Xin JF, Leonard DA. Using iPads to teach communication skills of students with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45:4154–4164.
   Google Scholar
• El Zein F, Gevarter C, Bryant B, et al. A comparison between iPad-assisted and teacher-directed reading instruction for students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). J Dev Phys Disabil. 2016;28:195–215.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher-Watson S, Petrou A, Scott-Barrett J, et al. A trial of an iPadTM intervention targeting social communication skills in children with autism. Autism. 2015;20:771–782.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni SS, Parmar J. Culturally and linguistically diverse student and family perspectives of AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33:170–180.
   Google Scholar
• Parette P, McMahan GA. Team sensitivity to family goals for and expectations of assistive technology. Teach Except Child. 2002;35:56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gunesekera M. The postcolonial identity of Sri Lankan English. Colombo: Vijitha Yapa Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge;1994. p.173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell FK. Contours of ableism: the production of disability and abledness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan;2009.
   Google Scholar
• Soto G, Yu B. Considerations for the provision of services to bilingual children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30:83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Wise PH. Emerging technologies and their impact on disability. Future Child. 2012;22:169–191.
   Google Scholar
• Rasid NNB, Nonis KP. Exploring communication technology behavior of adolescents with cerebral palsy in Singapore. Int J Spec Educ. 2015;30:17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Burns A. Conversational analysis: a data-driven approach to the study of parent-child interaction in Nigerian families. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. London (UK): Institute of Education, University of London;2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hettiarachchi S. In our culture, we ask our children questions and they listen and they reply. Culture is important. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. London (UK): City University;2010.
   Google Scholar
• Farver JAM, Kim YK, Lee Y. Cultural differences in Korean and Anglo-American preschoolers’ social interaction and play behaviours’. Child Dev. 1995;66:1088–1099.
   Google Scholar
• Parmar P, Harkness S, Super CM. Asian and Euro-American parents’ ethnotheories of play and learning: effects on preschool children’s home routines and school behavior. Int J Behav Dev. 2004;28:97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Roopnarine JL. Parental involvement, ethnotheories about development, parenting styles, and early academic achievement in Caribbean American children. Paper presented in the Department of Applied Psychology. New York (NY): New York University;1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey RL, Parette HP, Stoner JB, et al. Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2006;37:50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator S. Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and inclusive education for students with the most severe disabilities. Int J Inclusive Educ. 2009;13:93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt-Berg M. The bridge school. Educational inclusion outcomes over 15 years. Augment Altern Commun. 2005;21:116–131.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenmeier R, McSheehan M, Jorgensen C. A case study of team support for a student with autism’s communication and engagement within the general education curriculum: preliminary report of the beyond access model. Augment Altern Commun. 2005;21:101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Soto G, Muller E, Hunt P, et al. Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: an educational team perspective. Augment Altern Commun. 2001;17:62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Starble A, Hutchins T, Favro MA, et al. Family-centred intervention and satisfaction with AAC device training. Commun Disord Q. 2005;27:47–54.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe BM, Kozak NB, Schuller R. Research priorities in augmentative and alternative communication as identified by people who use AAC and their facilitators. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23:89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Goldbart J, Murray J, Hynan A. Social media and internet use by people who use AAC. 2016. Available from: http://papunet.net/tikoteekki/fileadmin/tiedostot/muut/Sillalla2016Goldbart_Social_media.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jones S, Angelo D, Kokoska S. Stressors and family supports: families with children using augmentative and alternative communication technology. J Child Commun Dev. 1999;20:37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart S, Parette HP. Native Americans and augmentative and alternative communication issues. Multiple Voice. 2002;5:38–53.
   Google Scholar