Development, reliability, and piloting of a wheelchair caster failure inspection tool (C-FIT)

References

• Borg J, Khasnabis C. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less-resourced settings. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Disabilities and Rehabilitation Publications. 2008. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/publications/technology/wheelchairguidelines/en
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2006. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/convtexte.htm
   Google Scholar
• United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Wheelchairs for less resourced settings. 2014. Available from https://www.usaid.gov/documents/1866/resource-list-wheelchairs-less-resourced-settings
   Google Scholar
• Mhatre A, Martin D, McCambridge M, et al. Developing product quality standards for wheelchairs used in less-resourced environments. African J Disabil. 2017;6:15.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO | Better health for people with disabilities: infographic. 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/infographic/en/
   Google Scholar
• Borg J, Lindström A, Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: a review from the perspective of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35:20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Marasinghe KM, Lapitan JM, Ross A. Assistive technologies for ageing populations in six low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Innov. 2015;1:182–195.
   Google Scholar
• Oderud T. Surviving spinal cord injury in low income countries: original research. African J Disabil. 2014;3:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon S, Jacobs NA. Report of a consensus conference on wheelchairs for developing countries. 2006. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/WCGconcensusconf/en
   Google Scholar
• Visagie S, Duffield S, Unger M. Exploring the impact of wheelchair design on user function in a rural South African setting: original research. African J Disabil. 2015;4:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Reese N, Rispin K. Assessing wheelchair breakdowns in Kenya to inform wheelchair test standards for low-resource settings. In: Proceedings of the 2015 RESNA Annual Conference. Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Rispin K, Riseling K, Wee J. A longitudinal study assessing the maintenance condition of cadres of four types of wheelchairs provided in low-resource areas. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:146–156.
   Google Scholar
• Saha R, Dey A, Hatoj M, et al. Study of wheelchair operations in rural areas covered under the District Rehabilitation Centre (DRC) scheme. Indian J Disabil Rehabil. 1990;Jul–Dec:57–87.
   Google Scholar
• Toro ML, Garcia Y, Ojeda AM, et al. Quantitative exploratory evaluation of the frequency, causes and consequences of rehabilitation wheelchair breakdowns delivered at a paediatric clinic in Mexico. Disabil CBR Incl Dev. 2012;23:48–64.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee G, Samanta A. Wheelchair charity: a useless benevolence in community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:591–596.
   Google Scholar
• Toro M, Worobey L, Boninger ML, et al. Type and frequency of reported wheelchair repairs and related adverse consequences among people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:1753–1760.
   Google Scholar
• Worobey L, Oyster M, Pearlman J, et al. Differences between manufacturers in reported power wheelchair repairs and adverse consequences among people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:597–603.
   Google Scholar
• Worobey L, Oyster M, Nemunaitis G, et al. Increases in wheelchair breakdowns, repairs, and adverse consequences for people with traumatic spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:463–469.
   Google Scholar
• Hogaboom NS, Worobey LA, Houlihan BV, et al. Wheelchair breakdowns are associated with pain, pressure injuries, rehospitalization, and self-perceived health in full-time wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99:1949–1956.
   Google Scholar
• Constantine D, Hingley CA, Howitt J. Donated wheelchairs in low-income countries - issue and alternative methods for improving wheelchair provision. London, The 4th Institution of Engineering and Technology Seminar on Appropriate Healthcare Technologies for Developing Countries. Savoy Place, 2006. p. 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J, Mulholland SJ, Kim J, Mulholland SJ. Seating/wheelchair technology in the developing world: need for a closer look. Vol. 11, Technology and Disability.Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press, 1999. p. 21–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Krizack M, et al. Lower-limb prostheses and wheelchairs in low-income countries. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2008;27:12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hotchkiss R. Independence through Mobility: a guide through the manufacture of the ATI-Hotchkiss Wheelchair. 1985. Available from: http://web.mit.edu/sp.784/www/DOCUMENTS/IndependencethroughMobility-EntireDocument.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5:36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Toro ML, Eke C, Pearlman J. The impact of the World Health Organization 8-steps in wheelchair service provision in wheelchair users in a less resourced setting: a cohort study in Indonesia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mhatre A, Ott J, Pearlman J. Development of wheelchair caster testing equipment and preliminary testing of caster models. Afr J Disabil. 2017;6:358.
   Google Scholar
• Gaal RP, Rebholtz N, Hotchkiss RD, et al. Wheelchair rider injuries: causes and consequences for wheelchair design and selection. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1997;34:58–71.
   Google Scholar
• Mair C. Applied internet-of things technology in the management of wheelchair maintenance at NHS WestMARC: a retrospective. In: European Seating Symposium. 2018,Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper RA, Robertson RN, Lawrence B, et al. Life-cycle analysis of depot versus rehabilitation manual wheelchairs. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1996;33:45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper RA, Gonzalez J, Lawrence B, et al. Performance of selected lightweight wheelchairs on ANSI/RESNA tests. American National Standards Institute-Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1138–1144.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper RA, Boninger ML, Rentschler A. Evaluation of selected ultralight manual wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:462–467.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper R, Stewart K, VanSickle D, et al. Manual Wheelchair ISO-ANSI/RESNA Fatigue Testing Experience. In: Proceedings of the RESNA ’94 Annual Conference. Nashville, TN; 1994. p. 324–326.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald SG, Yoest LM, Cooper RA. comparison of laboratory and actual fatigue life for three types of manual wheelchairs. In: Proceedings of the RESNA 2001 Annual Conference. Reno, NV, RESNA Press; 2001. p. 352–354.
   Google Scholar
• Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, et al. Evaluation of lightweight wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA testing standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50:1373–1389.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Cooper RRA, Pearlman J, et al. Evaluation of titanium ultralight manual wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;45:1251–1267.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Pearlman J, Cooper R, et al. Evaluation of aluminum ultralight rigid wheelchairs versus other ultralight wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. JRRD. 2010;47:441–455.
   Google Scholar
• Toro ML. Comparison of a manual wheelchair designed and produced in Mexico to a wheelchair produced in China based on ISO testing and clinician and user feedback. 2013. Available from: http://www.resna.org/sites/default/files/legacy/conference/proceedings/2013/WheeledMobility/StudentScientific/Toro.html
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Liu H-Y, Pearlman J, et al. Relationship between wheelchair durability and wheelchair type and years of test. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:318–322.
   Google Scholar
• Zipfel E, Cooper RA, Pearlman J, et al. New design and development of a manual wheelchair for India. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:949–962.
   Google Scholar
• Rentschler AJ, Cooper RA, Boninger ML, et al. Using stability and fatigue strength testing when choosing a manual wheelchair. In: Proceedings of the RESNA 2001 Annual Conference. Reno, NV, RESNA Press; 2001. p. 355–357.
   Google Scholar
• Kwarciak AM, Cooper RA, Ammer WA, et al. Fatigue testing of selected suspension manual wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Saha R. Study of wheelchair operations in rural areas covered under the district rehabilitation centre (DRC) scheme. Indian J Disabil Rehabil. 1990;74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Toro Hernandez ML. Development, implementation, and dissemination of a wheelchair maintenance training program. Pittsburgh, PA, University of Pittsburgh; 2016. Available from: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/26290/
   Google Scholar
• Karmarkar A, Collins D, Cooper R. Development of a wheelchair assessment checklist: preliminary psychometric analyses. In: Proceedings of the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America Conference. Arlington, VA, RESNA Press; 2009. Available from: https://www.resna.org/sites/default/files/legacy/conference/proceedings/2009/Outcomes/StudentPapers/Karmarkar.html
   Google Scholar
• Rispin K, DiFrancesco J, Raymond LA, et al. Preliminary inter-rater reliability of the wheelchair components questionnaire for condition. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;13:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Wheelchair Service Training Package - Basic level. 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/wheelchairpackage/en/
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong W, Reisinger KD, Smith WK. Evaluation of CIR-whirlwind wheelchair and service provision in Afghanistan. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:935–948.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee G, Samanta A. Evaluation of ambulatory performance of the arm propelled three-wheeled chair using heart rate as a control index. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:464–470.
   Google Scholar
• Shore S, Juillerat S. The impact of a low cost wheelchair on the quality of life of the disabled in the developing world. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18:CR533–CR542.
   Google Scholar
• Qualtrics I. Qualtrics.com. Provo, UT; Qualtric Research Suite. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO – ISO Standards – ISO/TC173/SC 1 – Wheelchairs. 2014. Available from https://www.iso.org/committee/53792.html.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use 4 edition. New York: Oxford University Press. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2529310
   Google Scholar
• SPSS IBM. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 22.0. New York: IBM Corp. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mhatre A. C-FIT. 2017. Available from: https://pitt.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3epYmwLWbQjjxpH
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez S, Arredondo M, Mhatre A. C-FIT - Spanish. 2017. Available from: https://pitt.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_8fgBEfkENh1sgFn
   Google Scholar
• Mhatre A, Vasquez S. C-FIT Information Guide. 2017. Available from: https://casterchecklist.wordpress.com/
   Google Scholar