Attitudes faced by young adults using assistive technology as depicted through photovoice

References

• Statistics Canada. Disability in Canada: initial findings from the Canadian Survey on Disability. [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-654-x/89-654-x2013001-eng.htm
   Google Scholar
• Stewart D. Evidence to support a positive transition into adulthood for youth with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2006;26:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Cussen A, Howie L, Imms C. Looking to the future: adolescents with cerebral palsy talk about their aspirations–a narrative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:2103–2110.
   Google Scholar
• Skär L. Peer and adult relationships of adolescents with disabilities. J Adolesc. 2003;26:635–649.
   Google Scholar
• International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: ICF. Geneva:World Health Organization, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Woodgate RL, Edwards M, Ripat J. How families of children with complex care needs participate in everyday life. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:1912–1920.
   Google Scholar
• Ripat JD, Woodgate RL. Self-perceived participation among adults with spinal cord injury: a grounded theory study. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:908–914.
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:578–588.
   Google Scholar
• Hästbacka E, Nygård M, Nyqvist F. Barriers and facilitators to societal participation of people with disabilities: a scoping review of studies concerning European countries. Alter. 2016;10:201–220.
   Google Scholar
• Ripat JD, Woodgate R. The importance of assistive technology in the productivity pursuits of young adults with disabilities. Work. 2017;57:455–468.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Participation and activity limitation survey: disability supports in Canada, 2006. [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/olc-cel/olc.action?objId=89-628-X&objType=2&lang=en&limit=1
   Google Scholar
• Ripat J, Woodgate R. The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve D. Negotiating psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and their influence on identity constructions. Disabil Soc. 2002;17:493–508.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay S. A scoping review of the experiences, benefits, and challenges involved in volunteer work among youth and young adults with a disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1533–1546.
   Google Scholar
• Spassiani NA, Ó Murchadha N, Clince M, et al. Likes, dislikes, supports and barriers: the experience of students with disabilities in university in Ireland. Disabil Soc. 2017;32:892–912.
   Google Scholar
• Wickenden M. Talking to teenagers: using anthropological methods to explore identity and the lifeworlds of young people who use AAC. Commun Disord Q. 2011;32:151–163.
   Google Scholar
• Anaby D, Hand C, Bradley L, et al. The effect of the environment on participation of children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1589–1598.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz KC. Grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Burr V. Social constructionism. London: Routledge; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Burbank PM, Martins DC. Symbolic interactionism and critical perspective: divergent or synergistic? Nurs Philos. 2010;11:25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Burris MA. Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ Behav. 1997;24:387.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Light J. The iPad and mobile technology revolution: benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29:107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Taherian S, Davies C. Multiple stakeholder perceptions of assistive technology for individuals with cerebral palsy in New Zealand. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:648–657.
   Google Scholar
• Ripat J, Verdonck M, Gacek C, et al. A qualitative metasynthesis of the meaning of speech-generating devices for people with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun. 2018;1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Burles M, Thomas R. “I just don’t think there’s any other image that tells the story like [this] picture does”: researcher and participant reflections on the use of participant-employed photography in social research. Int J Qual Methods. 2014;13:185–205.
   Google Scholar
• Woodgate RL, Zurba M, Tennent P. Worth a thousand words? Advantages, challenges and opportunities in working with photovoice as a qualitative research method with youth and their families. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2017;18:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Dahan-Oliel N, Shikako-Thomas K, Mazer B, et al. Adolescents with disabilities participate in the shopping mall: facilitators and barriers framed according to the ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:2102–2113.
   Google Scholar
• Woodgate RL, Tennent P, Zurba M. Navigating ethical challenges in qualitative research with children and youth through sustaining mindful presence. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston G. Champions for social change: photovoice ethics in practice and “ 'false hopes' for policy and social change” . Glob Public Health. 2016;11:799–811.
   Google Scholar
• Call-Cummings M, Martinez S. Consciousness-raising or unintentionally oppressive? Potential negative consequences of photovoice. Qual Rep. 2016;21:798–810.
   Google Scholar