Assistive technology self-management intervention for older Hispanics: a feasibility study

References

• Bureau USC. National population projections. Washington (DC): US Census Bureau, Population Division; 2012. Table 6. Percent of the Population by Race and Hispanic Origin for the United States: 2015 to 2060. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman VA, Spillman BC. Disability and care needs among older Americans. Milbank Q. 2014;92:509–541.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson W, Lee C, Schrader S. Disability statistics from the 2013 American Community Survey (ACS). Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute (YTI); 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 14]. Available from: http://www.disabilitystatistics.org
   Google Scholar
• Kaye HS, Yeager P, Reed M. Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities. Assist Technol. 2008;20:194–203.
   Google Scholar
• Ripat J, Woodgate R. The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Orellano-Colón EM, Mann WC, Rivero M, et al. Hispanic older adult’s perceptions of personal, contextual and technology-related barriers for using assistive technology devices. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016;3:676–686.
   Google Scholar
• Orellano-Colón EM, Morales FM, Sotelo Z, et al. Development of an assistive technology intervention for community older adults. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2017;35:49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Bycroft J, Boyd M. Self-management support toolkit: health navigator. Health Navigator NZ. New Zeland. 2014 [cited 2018 Jun 13]. Available from: https://www.healthnavigator.org.nz/media/1001/self-management-support-toolkit-for-review-and-editing-july-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, et al. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:660–680.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar MC, Ewing G, Booth S. Using mixed methods to develop and evaluate complex interventions in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2011;25:748–757.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Ayendez M, Caban CA, Fernandez L, et al. [A short psychometric scale to evaluate the cognitive status of aged Spanish speakers]. P R Heal Sci J. 2003;22:377–383.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels R, Persson J, Lorentsen O, et al. {IPPA}: individually prioritised problem assessment. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:141–145.
   Google Scholar
• Orellano EM, Jutai JW. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Device Scale (PIADS) for puerto rican assistive technology users. Assist Technol. 2013;25: 194–203.
   Google Scholar
• Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, et al. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:873–880.
   Google Scholar
• Juarez F, Contreras F. Psychometric properties of the general self-efficacy scale in a Columbian sample. Int J of Psychol Res. 2008;1:6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Re.s 2017;17:88.
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H. Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS). Technol Disabil. 2002;14:107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lysack C, Luborsky MR, Dillaway H. Gathering qualitative data. In: Kielhofner G, editor. Research in occupational therapy: methods of inquiry for enhancing practice. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2006. p. 341–357.
   Google Scholar
• Squires A. Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: a research review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:277–287.
   Google Scholar
• Markle-Reid M, Ploeg J, Fisher K, et al. The aging, community and health research unit-community partnership program for older adults with type 2 diabetes and multiple chronic conditions: a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2:24.
   Google Scholar
• Sosnoff JJ, Wajda DA, Sandroff BM, et al. Dual task training in persons with multiple sclerosis: a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31:1322–1331.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan RL, Kreuter MW, Brownson RC. Integrating adult learning principles into training for public health practice. Health Promot Pract. 2009;10:557–563.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson L, Gibson G, Kingston A, et al. Assistive technologies in caring for the oldest old: a review of current practice and future directions. Aging Health. 2013;9:365–375.
   Google Scholar
• Agree EM, Freedman VA. A quality-of-life scale for assistive technology: results of a pilot study of aging and technology. Phys Ther. 2011;91:1780–1788.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt R, Chau B, Jutai JW. The effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis. Occup Ther Heal Care. 2004;17:63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18:439–448.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989;27:S217–S232.
   Google Scholar
• Versteegh MM, Leunis A, Uyl-De Groot CA, et al. Condition-specific preference-based measures: benefit or burden? Value Health. 2012;15:504–513.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper RA, Zimmerman RA. Culture-based extreme response bias in surveys employing variable response items: an investigation of response tendency among Hispanic-Americans. J Int Bus Res. 2006;5:75–83.
   Google Scholar