“The fact that I can be in front of others, I am used to being a bit behind”: how assistive activity technology affects participation in everyday life

References

• Halvorsen R, Hvinden B, Brown JB, et al. Chapter 1, Changing opportunities for active citizenship. In Understanding the lived experiences of persons with disabilities in nine countries: active citizenship and disability in Europe. New York (NY): Routledge; 2017. p. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations. 2006. [last accessed 2018 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
   Google Scholar
• Carroll DD, Courtney-Long EA, Stevens AC, et al. Vital signs: disability and physical activity—United States, 2009–2012. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63:407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyremyhr ÅE, Diaz E, Meland E. How adolescent subjective health and satisfaction with weight and body shape are related to participation in sports. J Environ Public Health. 2014;2014:1.
   Google Scholar
• Martin Ginis KA, Ma JK, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al. A systematic review of review articles addressing factors related to physical activity participation among children and adults with physical disabilities. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10:478–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundskriv til § 10-7 bokstav a - Aktivitetshjelpemidler til personer over 26 år. [Circular to § 10-7 letter a - assistive activity technology for persons over 26 years of age.] NAV. Norwegian. 2015. [last accessed 2018 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.nav.no/rettskildene/Rundskriv/10-7-bokstav-a-aktivitetshjelpemidler-til-personer-over-26-%C3%A5r
   Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ripat J, Woodgate R. The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:87–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ness NE. Hjelpemidler og tilrettelegging for deltakelse: et kunnskapsbasert grunnlag [Assistive technology facilitating for participation: on a knowledge-basis]. Trondheim (Norway): Tapir Akademisk; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Scherer MJ, et al. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:1243–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström S, Hemmingsson H. Chapter 14, Digitalised communication and social interaction. In Participation in health and welfare services: professional concepts and lived experience. New York (NY): Routledge; 2017. p.170–183.
   Google Scholar
• Ravneberg B, Söderström S. Disability, society and assistive technology. Oxon and New York (NY): Taylor & Francis; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström S. Chapter 19, Assistive ICT and young disabled persons: opportunities and obstacles in identity negotiations. In Handbook of research on technoself: identity in a technological society. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2013. p. 337–358.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, et al. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1321–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Glueckauf R. Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape TB, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:5–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G, Mackeogh T. The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:811–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravneberg B. Identity politics by design: users, markets and the public service provision for assistive technology in Norway. Scand J Disabil Res. 2009;11:101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Steel EJ, Layton NA, Foster MM, et al. Challenges of user-centred assistive technology provision in Australia: shopping without a prescription. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:235–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggblom Kronlöf G. Participation in everyday life. Very old persons’ experiences of daily occupation, occupation of interest and use of assistive devices. Gothenburg (Sweden): Institute of Medicine. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway D. Chapter 4, A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In The cybercultures reader. London (UK) and New York (NY): Routledge; 2001. p. 117–158.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker WE, Law J. Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Skjølsvold TM. Vitenskap, teknologi og samfunn [Science, technology and society]. Oslo (Norway): Cappelen Damm AS; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Carnevale FA, King G. “This is my way”: reimagining disability, in/dependence and interconnectedness of persons and assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1894–1899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking C. Having and using objects in the Western world. J Occup Sci. 2000;7:148–157.
   Google Scholar
• Côté-Leclerc F, Duchesne GB, Bolduc P, et al. How does playing adapted sports affect quality of life of people with mobility limitations? Results from a mixed-method sequential explanatory study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenseng F, Forest J, Curran T. Positive emotions in recreational sport activities: the role of passion and belongingness. J Happiness Stud. 2015;16:1117–1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelenka T, Kudláček M, Wittmannová J. Quality of life of wheelchair rugby players. EBSCO. 2017;10:31–35.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin G, Weisman Fecske C, Castaneda Y, et al. Sport participation for elite athletes with physical disabilities: motivations, barriers, and facilitators. Adapt Phys Activ. 2017;34:421–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissow AM, Singhammer J. Participation in physical activities and everyday life of people with disabilities. Eur J Adapt Phys Act. 2012;5:65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Arbeids- og sosialdepartementet. En mer effektiv og fremtidsrettet hjelpemiddelformidling – for økt deltakelse og mestring [A more effective and forward-looking allocation of assistive technology – for increased participation and coping]. Oslo (Norway): Arbeids- og sosialdepartementet [Ministry of labour and social affairs]. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:577–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephsson S, Eide AH, Kjersti V. Participation in health and welfare services: professional concepts and lived experience. New York (NY): Routledge; 2017. Chapter 1, Introduction and rationale; p. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelle KM, Vik K. The ups and downs of social participation: experiences of wheelchair users in Norway. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:2479–2489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1445–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borell L, Asaba E, Rosenberg L, et al. Exploring experiences of “participation” among individuals living with chronic pain. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13:76–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol. 2008;49:182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. Am Psychol 2000;55:68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Schiöldberg K. Tolkning og reflection. Vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod [Interpretation and reflection. Science philosophy and qualitative method. 2nd ed.]. Lund (Sweden): Studentlitteratur AB; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles (CA): Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tjora A. Qualitative research as stepwise-deductive induction. London (UK) and New York (NY): Routledge; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning [Qualitative methods in medical research.]. 2nd ed. Oslo (Norway): Universitetsforlaget; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S, Anderssen TM, et al. Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. [Interview[s] learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing]. Norwegian. 3rd ed. Oslo (Norway): Gyldendal Akademisk; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Grue J. Kroppsspråk: Fremstillinger av funksjonshemming i kultur og samfunn [Body language: Disability in culture and community]. Norwegian. Oslo (Norway): Gyldendal Akademisk; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84:822–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar