Assistive technologies for children with cognitive and/or motor disabilities: interviews as a means to diagnose the training needs of informal caregivers

References

• Florian L, Hegarty J. ICT and special education needs – a tool for inclusion. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Philips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol Off J RESNA. 1993;5:36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riemer-Reiss ML, Wacker RR. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil. 2000;66:44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa CR, Ferreira FM, Bortolus MV, et al. Dispositivos de tecnologia assistiva: fatores relacionados ao abandono. Cad Ter Ocup UFSCar. 2015;23(3):611–624.
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Polgar JM. Cook and Hussey’s assistive technologies: principles and practice [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Cook-Husseys-Assistive-Technologies-Principles/dp/0323039073.
   Google Scholar
• Queirós A, Rocha NP. Tecnologias de apoio. Rev. do DETUA. 2002;3(5):430–437.
   Google Scholar
• Desideri L, Stefanelli B, Bitelli C, et al. Satisfaction of users with assistive technology service delivery: an exploratory analysis of experiences of parents of children with physical and multiple disabilities. Dev Neurorehabil. 2016;19:255–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int. 2004;11(4):229–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahmad FK. Use of assistive technology in inclusive education: making room for diverse learning needs. Transcience. 2015;6:62–67.
   Google Scholar
• Tymoshchuk O, Almeida AM, Santos PC. Comunicação e Linguagem: Espaço online de compartilha e de autoformação em TIC para a Educação Especial. EXEDRA Rev. Científica ESEC. Número temático – Educ. Espec. Contrib. para a Interv. [Internet]. 2015; 191–207. Available from: http://www.exedrajournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/14.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reed P, Bowser G. Assistive technologies – pointers for parents [Internet]. Wyoming, U.S.A.: University of Wyoming; 2013. Available from: http://www.uwyo.edu/wind/_files/docs/watr/atpointers.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa C. A comunicação aumentativa e as tecnologias de apoio. A acessibilidade recursos educativos digitais – caderno sacausef VI. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação e Ciência; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill T, Mandak K, Wilkinson KM. Family leisure as a context to support augmentative and alternative communication intervention for young children with complex communication needs. Semin Speech Lang. 2017;38:313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parette P, VanBiervliet A, Hourcade J. Family-centered decision making in assistive technology. J Spec Educ Technol. 1999;15(1):45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston SS, Evans J. Considering response efficiency as a strategy to prevent assistive technology abandonment. J Spec Educ Technol. 2005;20(3):45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sugawara AT, Ramos VD, Alfieri FM, et al. Abandonment of assistive products: assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(7):716–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie H, Carmien S, Lewis A. Assistive technology abandonment: research realities and potentials. Int Conf Comput Help People with Spec Needs. 2018;532–540.
   Google Scholar
• Shinohara K, Wobbrock JO. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. CHI 2011 - Sess. HCI all [Internet]. 2011;705–714. Available from: https://faculty.washington.edu/wobbrock/pubs/chi-11.03.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Parette P, Scherer MJ. Assistive technology use and stigma. Educ Train Dev Disabil. 2004;39:217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bispo R, Branco V. Designing out stigma: the role of objects in the construction of disabled people’s identity. Dare to Desire 6th Int Des Conf. [Internet]. Hong Kong; 2008. Available from: https://iconline.ipleiria.pt/bitstream/10400.8/171/1/Designing out stigma - The role of objects in the.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brotherson MJ, Cook CC, Parette HP. A home-centered approach to assistive technology provision for young children with disabilities. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 1996;11(2):86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Raskind MH. Assistive Technology – a parent’s guide [Internet]. 2008. Available from: https://www.greatschools.org/pdfs/e_guide_at.pdf?date=3-13-06&status=new.
   Google Scholar
• Amado J. A investigação em Educação e seus paradigmas. In: Amado J, editor. Man. Investig. Qual. em Educ. 3^a edição. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra; 2017. p. 21–73.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira H, Caleffe LG. Metodologia da pesquisa para o professor pesquisador. 2^a edição. Rio De Janeiro: Lamparina Editora; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan RC, Biklen SK. Investigação qualitativa em educação – Uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto: Porto Editora; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida LS, Freire T. Capítulo 1. A investigação psicológica. Metodol. da Investig. em Psicol. e Educ. 5^a edição. Braga: Psiquilíbrios Edições; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 5th ed. London: Routledge; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE. How to design and evaluate research in education. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Coutinho CP. Metodologia de investigação em ciências sociais e humanas: teoria e prática. 2^a edição. Coimbra: Almedina; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bardin L. L’analyse du contenu. 4ème éd. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Amado J, Costa AP, Crusoé N. A técnica da análise de conteúdo. In: Amado J, editor. Man Investig Qual em Educ. 3^a. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra; 2017. p. 303–352.
   Google Scholar
• Quivy R, Campenhoudt L. Manual de investigação em Ciências Sociais. 5^a edição. Lisboa: Gradiva; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pousada García T, Pereira Loureiro J, Groba González B, et al. The use of computers and augmentative and alternative communication devices by children and young with cerebral palsy. Assist Technol. 2011;23(3):135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelo D. Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. Augment Altern Commun. 2000;16(1):37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey RL, Parette HP, Stoner JB, et al. Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2006;37(1):50–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J. Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: state of the art and future directions. AAC Augment Altern Commun. 1988;4(2):66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. AAC Augment Altern Commun Informa Healthcare. 2015;31(2):85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro J. As tecnologias de informação e comunicação e os produtos de apoio na educação de alunos com necessidades educativas especiais In: Linhares R, Ferreira S, Borges F, editors. Infoinclusão e as possibilidades ensinar e aprender. Salvador: Editora UFBa; 2014. p. 15–46.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson JM, Inglebret E, Jones C, et al. Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augment Altern Commun [Internet]. 2006;22(2):85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang I-C, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Children’s perceptions of their use of assistive devices in home and school settings. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4(2):95–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kling A, Campbell PH, Wilcox J. Young children with physical disabilities: caregiver perspective about assistive technology. Infants Young Child. 2010;23(3):169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson P, Johnston C, Barker K. Influences on students’ assistive technology use at school: the views of classroom teachers, allied health professionals, students with cerebral palsy and their parents. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;13:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung KT, Lin CH, Teng YL, et al. Use of and self-perceived need for Assistive devices in individuals with disabilities in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152707–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira A, Silva K, Lima M. Boas práticas na implementação de sistemas alternativos e aumentativos de comunicação nas unidades de apoio especializado para educação de alunos com multideficiência em Portugal continental: uma exigência por cumprir? Saber Educ. 2017;23:22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Raina P, O’ Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, et al. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics [Internet]. 2005;115(6):e626–e636.
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Pysklywec A, Fuhrer MJ, et al. Caregivers’ experiences with the selection and use of assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:562–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Tetzchner S, Introdução MH. à comunicação aumentativa e alternativa. Porto: Porto Editora; 2003.
   Google Scholar