Speech-Language pathologists’ decisions when designing an aided AAC display for a compilation case study of a beginning communicator

References

• Romski MA, Sevcik RA, Hyatt A, et al. A continuum of AAC intervention strategies for beginning communicators. In: Reichle J, Beukelman DR, Light JC, editors. Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: implications for AAC. Baltimore (MD): Paul H. Brookes Pub. Co.; 2002. p. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ganz JB, Sigafoos J, Simpson RL, et al. Generalization of a pictorial alternative communication system across instructors and distance. Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24(2):89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyfield C, Caron JG, Drager K, et al. Effect of mobile technology featuring visual scene displays and just-in-time programming on communication turns by preadolescent and adolescent beginning communicators. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;21(2):201–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trottier N, Kamp L, Mirenda P. Effects of peer-mediated instruction to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. Augment Altern Commun. 2011;27(1):26–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda P. Supporting individuals with challenging behavior through functional communication training and AAC: research review. Augment Altern Commun. 1997;13(4):207–225.
   Google Scholar
• Robillard M, Mayer-Crittenden C, Roy-Charland A, et al. Exploring the impact of cognition on young children’s ability to navigate a speech-generating device. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29(4):347–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle JJ, Wilkinson KM. What are the attention demands of aided AAC? Perspect Augment Altern Commun. 2012;21(1):17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Thistle JJ, Wilkinson KM. Working memory demands of aided augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with developmental disabilities. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29(3):235–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone S. What are visual scene displays? Augment Comm News. 2004;16:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson K, Light J. Preliminary investigation of visual attention to human figures in photographs: Potential considerations for the design of aided AAC visual scene displays. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(6):1644–1657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, Mitchell T. Eye tracking research to answer questions about augmentative and alternative communication assessment and intervention. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(2):106–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venker CE, Kover ST. An open conversation on using eye-gaze methods in studies of neurodevelopmental disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58(6):1719–1732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, Light J. Preliminary study of gaze toward humans in photographs by individuals with autism, Down syndrome, or other intellectual disabilities: implications for design of visual scene displays. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(2):130–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill T, Wilkinson KM, Light J. Preliminary investigation of visual attention to complex AAC visual scene displays in individuals with and without developmental disabilities. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(3):240–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, Wilkinson KM, Thiessen A, et al. Designing effective AAC displays for individuals with developmental or acquired disabilities: state of the science and future research directions. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(1):42–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson K, Jagaroo V. Contributions of principles of visual cognitive science to AAC system display design. Augment Altern Commun. 2004;20(3):123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, Carlin M, Thistle J. The role of color cues in facilitating accurate and rapid location of aided symbols by children with and without Down syndrome. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17(2):179–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, McIlvane WJ. Perceptual factors influence visual search for meaningful symbols in individuals with intellectual disabilities and Down syndrome or autism spectrum disorders. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013;118(5):353–364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, O’Neill T, Nauss J, et al. Eye tracking helps reveal mechanisms underlying facilitation of responses to visual communication displays by individuals with and without intellectual disabilities. Symposium presented at: Annual Gatlinburg Conference on Research and Theory in Mental Retardation/Developmental Disabilities; 2012 Mar; Annapolis, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, O’Neill T, McIlvane WJ. Eye-tracking measures reveal how changes in the design of aided AAC displays influence the efficiency of locating symbols by school-aged children without disabilities. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57(2):455–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, Madel M. Eye tracking measures reveal how changes in the design of displays for augmentative and alternative communication influence visual search in individuals with Down syndrome or autism spectrum disorder. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28(4):1649–1658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle JJ, Wilkinson K. The effects of color cues on typically developing preschoolers’ speed of locating a target line drawing: Implications for augmentative and alternative communication display design. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;18(3):231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle JJ, Wilkinson KM. Effects of background color and symbol arrangement cues on construction of multi-symbol messages by young children without disabilities: implications for aided AAC design. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33(3):160–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, Coombs B. Preliminary exploration of the effect of background color on the speed and accuracy of search for an aided symbol target by typically developing preschoolers. Early Child Serv (San Diego). 2010;4(3):171–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, Snell J. Facilitating children’s ability to distinguish symbols for emotions: The effects of background color cues and spatial arrangement of symbols on accuracy and speed of search. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;20(4):288–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, Weiss A. Background color cues do not facilitate attention to AAC symbols by individuals with and without Down syndrome. Paper presented at: American Speech-Language Hearing Association annual convention; 2017 Nov; Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Thistle JJ. The effect of symbol background color on the speed of locating targets by adults without disabilities: Implications for augmentative and alternative communication display design. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2019;4(6):1482–1488.
   Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Gilmore R, Wilkinson K. The effects of spatial organization in the design of visual supports for adults with communicative disorders. Paper presented at: Visual Sciences Society annual conference; 2019 May; St. Pete Beach, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Raghavendra P. Evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2004;20(1):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• McFadd E, Wilkinson K. Qualitative analysis of decision making by speech-language pathologists in the design of aided visual displays. Augment Altern Commun. 2010;26(2):136–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle JJ, Wilkinson KM. Building evidence-based practice in AAC display design for young children: current practices and future directions. Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31(2):124–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans SC, Roberts MC, Keeley JW, et al. Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015;15(2):160–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogletree BT, Pierce HK. AAC for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities: Ideas for nonsymbolic communicators. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2010;22(3):273–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel EB, Cress CJ. Overview of the emergence of early AAC behaviors: Progression from communicative to symbolic skills. In: Reichle J, Beukelman DR, Light JC, editors. Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: implications for AAC. Baltimore (MD): Paul H. Brookes Pub. Co.; 2002. p. 25–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. 2003;15(1):85–109.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel P. Engaging families as experts: collaborative family program development. Fam Process. 2006;45(2):237–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Census US. Geographic terms and concepts – Census divsions and census regions [Internet]. 2011. [cited 2013 Feb 14]. Available from: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/2010census/gtc/gtc_census_divreg.html
   Google Scholar
• Adamson LB, Romski MA, Deffebach K, et al. Symbol vocabulary and the focus of conversations: augmenting language development for youth with mental retardation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1992;35(6):1333–1343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light JC, Drager K. Maximizing language development wth young children who require AAC. Paper presented at: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association annual convention; 2005 Nov; San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. 4th ed. Baltimore (MD): Paul H Brookes Pub Co; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt P, Soto G, Maier J, et al. Collaborative teaming to support students with augmentative and alternative communication needs in general education classrooms. Augment Altern Commun. 2002;18(1):20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo D. Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. Augment Altern Commun. 2000;16(1):37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Jones SD, Angelo DH, Kokoska SM. Stressors and family supports: families with children using augmentative & alternative communication technology. Commun Disord Q. 1999;20(2):37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Drager KDR, Light JC, Speltz JC, et al. The performance of typically developing 2 1/2-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46(2):298–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager KDR, Light JC, Carlson R, et al. Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year-olds: effect of different layouts and menu approaches. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;47(5):1133–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager KDR, Light J, Currall J, et al. AAC technologies with visual scene displays and “just in time” programming and symbolic communication turns expressed by students with severe disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019;44(3):321–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron J, Light J, Davidoff BE, et al. Comparison of the effects of mobile technology AAC apps on programming visual scene displays. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33(4):239–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski MA, Sevcik RA. Breaking the speech barrier: language development through augmented means. Baltimore (MD): Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Romski M, Sevcik RA, Adamson LB, et al. Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(2):350–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton-Hulsey A, Wegner J, Brady NC, et al. Comparing the effects of speech-generating device display organization on symbol comprehension and use by three children with developmental delays. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(2):227–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen A, Beukelman D, Hux K, et al. Comparison of the visual attention patterns of people with aphasia and adults without neurological conditions for camera-engaged and task-engaged visual scenes. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(2):290–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen A, Beukelman D, Ullman C, et al. Measurement of the visual attention patterns of people with aphasia: a preliminary investigation of two types of human engagement in photographic images. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(2):120–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JM, Inglebret E, Jones C, et al. Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2006;22(2):85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda P, Locke PA. A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. J Speech Hear Disord. 1989;54(2):131–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sevcik R, Romski MA. Representational matching skills of persons with severe retardation. Augment Altern Commun. 1986;2(4):160–164.
   Google Scholar