Item development, internal consistency, and known-groups validity of the Self-Directed Mobility Scale

References

• Zablotsky B, Black LI, Blumberg SJ. Estimated prevalence of children with diagnosed developmental disabilities in the United States, 2014–2016. NCHS Data Brief, no 291. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2017. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db291.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Logan SW, Hospodar CM, Feldner HA, et al. Modified ride-on car use by young children with disabilities. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2018;30(1):50–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer SM, Elsaesser LJ, Arthanat S. Assistive technology device classification based upon the World Health Organization’s, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(3):243–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feldner HA, Logan SW, Galloway JC. Why the time is right for a radical paradigm shift in early powered mobility: the role of powered mobility technology devices, policy and stakeholders. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(2):89–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusing SC, Skinner AC, Mayer ML. Unmet need for therapy services, assistive devices, and related services: Data from the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs. Ambul Pediatr. 2004;4(5):448–454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindsay S, Tsybina I. Predictors of unmet needs for communication and mobility assistive devices among youth with a disability: the role of socio-cultural factors. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(1):10–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenyon LK, Jones M, Livingstone R, et al. Power mobility for children: a survey study of American and Canadian therapists' perspectives and practices. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(10):1018–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon LK, Jones M, Breaux B, et al. American and Canadian therapists’ perspectives of age and cognitive skills for paediatric power mobility: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen L, Arva J, Furumasu J, et al. RESNA position on the application of power wheelchairs for pediatric users. Assist Technol. 2009;21(4):218–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen L, Plummer T, Sabet A, et al. RESNA position on the application of power mobility devices for pediatric users. Assist Technol. 2017;12:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dugan LM, Campbell PH, Wilcox MJ. Making decisions about assistive technology with infants and toddlers. Top Early Child Spec Edu. 2006;26(1):25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus BM, Prosser LA, Gannotti ME. Which children Are not getting their needs for therapy or mobility aids met? Data from the 2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs. Phys Ther. 2016;96(2):222–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore HW, Wilcox MJ. Characteristics of early intervention practitioners and their confidence in the use of assistive technology. Top Early Child Spec Edu. 2006;26(1):15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long TM, Perry DF. Pediatric physical therapists' perceptions of their training in assistive technology. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):629–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long TM, Woolverton M, Perry DF, et al. Training needs of pediatric occupational therapists in assistive technology. Am J Occup Ther. 2007;61(3):345–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox JM, Guimond A, Campbell PA, et al. Providers perspectives on the use of assistive technology for infants and toddlers with disabilities. Top Early Child Spec Edu. 2006;26(1):33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, et al. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Niekerk K, Dada S, Tönsing K, et al. Factors perceived by rehabilitation professionals to influence the provision of assistive technology to children: A systematic review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018;38(2):168–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiart L, Darrah J. Changing philosophical perspectives on the management of children with physical disabilities-their effect on the use of powered mobility. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(9):492–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape TLB, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1–3):5–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripat J, Woodgate R. The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(2):87–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang H-H, Galloway JC. Modified ride-on toy cars for early power mobility: A technical report. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2012;24(2):149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan SW, Feldner HA, Bogart KR, et al. Toy-based technologies for disabled children simultaneously supporting self-directed mobility, participation and function: a tech report. Front Robot AI. 2017;4:7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drost EA. Validity and reliability in social science research. Edu Res Perspect. 2011;38(1):105–123.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Stamford (CT): McGraw Hill/Appleton & Lange; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Logan SW, Bogart KR, Ross SM, et al. Mobility is a fundamental human right: Factors predicting attitudes toward self-directed mobility. Disabil Health J. 2018;11(4):562–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan SW, Bogart KR. The effect of an intervention on college students’ attitudes toward people with disabilities and self-directed mobility. Int J Disabil Dev Edu.
   Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int. 2004;11(4):229–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang I-C, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Assistive devices and cerebral palsy: factors influencing the use of assistive devices at home by children with cerebral palsy. Child: Care Health Dev. 2008;35(1):130–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østensjø S, Carlberg EB, Vøllestad NK. The use and impact of assistive devices and other environmental modifications on everyday activities and care in young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(14):849–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar