References
- Larsson RA, Lidstorm H. Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process – a systematic review. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):82–97.
- Demers L, Wessels R, Weiss Lambrou R, et al. Key dimensions of client satisfaction with assistive technology: a cross-validation of a Canadian measure in The Netherlands. Rehab Med. 2001;33(4):187–191.
- Karmarkar AM, Collins DM, Kelleher A, et al. Manual wheelchair-related mobility characteristics of older adults in nursing homes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):428–437.
- Samuelsson K, Wressle E. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: an important element in the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(7):551–558.
- Bergström AL, Samuelsson K. Evaluation of manual wheelchairs by individuals with spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1(3):175–182.
- Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5(1):36–45.
- Schrijvers A, Jedeloo S, De Witee L, et al. Client satisfaction with service delivery of assistive technology for outdoor mobility. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(10):550–557.
- Stefanac S, Grabovac I, Fristedt S. Wheelchair users’ satisfaction with the prescribed wheelchairs and wheelchair services in Croatia. Collegium Antropologicum. 2019;42(3):101.
- Ministry of health. Rehabilitation and mobility devices [access date 2017 May 22]. Available from: https://www.health.gov.il/Services/Citizen_Services/mobility/Pages/Participation.aspx
- Ministry of health. Mobility and rehabilitation technology department [access date 2019 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/rehab_2018.pdf.
- Batavia A, Hammer G. Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1990; 27(4):425–436.
- Ministry of health. Mobility and rehabilitation technology department [access date 2019 Sep 25]. Available from: https://www.health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/rehab_2011.pdf.
- Ministry of health. Mobility and rehabilitation technology department. [access date 2019 Sep 25]. Available from: https://www.health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/rehab_2014.pd.
- Demers L, Monette M, Lapierre Y, et al. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1–3):21–30.
- World Health Organization. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments [access date 2017 May 22]. Available http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/">from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.
- Mao H, Chen W, Yao G, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): the development of the Taiwanese version. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(5):412–421.
- Wessels R, Witte L. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(6):267–272.
- Karmarkar AM, Collins DM, Kelleher A, et al. Satisfaction related to wheelchair use in older adults in both nursing homes and community dwelling. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4(5):337–343.
- Marchiori C, Bensmail D, Gagnon D, et al. Manual wheelchair satisfaction among long-term users and caregivers: A French study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(2):181–192.
- Ní Mhaoláin AM, Gallagher D, O Connell H, et al. Subjective well-being amongst community-dwelling elders: what determines satisfaction with life? Findings from the Dublin Healthy Aging Study. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(2):316–323.