325
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Correlates of self-reported Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire scores of new users of mobility scooters: a cross-sectional study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 483-490 | Received 16 Dec 2020, Accepted 06 Jan 2021, Published online: 27 Jan 2021

References

  • Smith EM, Giesbrecht EM, Mortenson WB, et al. Prevalence of wheelchair and scooter use among community-dwelling Canadians. Phys Ther. 2016;96(8):1135–1142.
  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). Mobility scooter usage and safety survey report. Product Safety Australia;2012.
  • Edwards K, Mccluskey A. A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):411–419.
  • Fomiatti R, Moir L, Richmond J, et al. The experience of being a motorised mobility scooter user. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(3):183–187.
  • Samuelsson K, Wressle E. Powered wheelchairs and scooters for outdoor mobility: a pilot study on costs and benefits. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(4):330–334.
  • Mortenson WB, Kim J. Scoping review of mobility scooter-related research studies. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(5):531–540.
  • Chen WY, Jang Y, Wang JD, et al. Wheelchair-related accidents: relationship with wheelchair-using behavior in active community wheelchair users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(6):892–898.
  • Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. [cited 2020 Dec 14]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/guidelines-on-the-provision-of-manual-wheelchairs-in-less-resourced-settings/.
  • Keeler L, Kirby RL, Parker K, et al. Effectiveness of the Wheelchair Skills Training Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(4):391–409.
  • Wang Y, Li KC, Deng XQ. Rehabilitation efficacy of paraplegics with standardized wheelchair skills training. Chinese J Rehabil. 2013;5:351–353.
  • Best KL, Miller WC, Huston G, et al. Pilot study of a peer-led wheelchair training program to improve self-efficacy using a manual wheelchair: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(1):37–44.
  • Sakakibara BM, Miller WC, Souza M, et al. Wheelchair skills training to improve confidence with using a manual wheelchair among older adults: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(6):1031–1037.
  • Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Backman CL, et al. Association between mobility, participation, and wheelchair-related factors in long-term care residents who use wheelchairs as their primary means of mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(7):1310–1315.
  • Rushton PW, Kirby RL, Routhier F, et al. Measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test-Questionnaire for powered wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):400–406.
  • Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Polgar JM. Measurement properties of the Late Life Disability Index among individuals who use power wheelchairs as their primary means of mobility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(10):1918–1924.
  • Mortenson WB, Hoag E, Higgins R, et al. Stakeholders’ perspectives related to the development of a scooter training program. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(4):289–294.
  • Nitz JC. Evidence from a cohort of able bodied adults to support the need for driver training for motorized scooters before community participation. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(2):276–280.
  • Jannink MJA, Erren-Wolters CV, de Kort AC, et al. An electric scooter simulation program for training the driving skills of stroke patients with mobility problems: a pilot study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(6):751–754.
  • Mortenson WB, Clarke LH, Goldsmith CH, et al. Measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test for scooters among experienced users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(1):60–65.
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
  • Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear. 1982;3(3):128–134.
  • Yueh B, Shapiro N, MacLean CH, et al. Screening and management of adult hearing loss in primary care: Scientific review. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289(15):1976–1985.
  • Grosvenor TP. Primary care optometry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.
  • Holladay JT. Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. J Refract Surg. 1997;13(4):388–391.
  • Giovagnoli AR, Del Pesce M, Mascheroni S, et al. Trail making test: normative values from 287 normal adult controls. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1996;17(4):305–309.
  • Devos H, Akinwuntan AE, Nieuwboer A, et al. Screening for fitness to drive after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol. 2011;76(8):747–756.
  • Kirby RL, Smith C, Parker K, et al. The Wheelchair Skills Program Manual Version 4.3 [Internet]. Halifax; 2015. [cited 2020 Aug 12]. Available from: www.wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/.
  • Baker PS, Bodner EV, Allman RM. Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(11):1610–1614.
  • Auger C, Demers L, Gélinas I, et al. Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(5):765–773.
  • Rushton PW, Miller WC, Kirby RL, et al. Measure for the assessment of confidence with manual wheelchair use (WheelCon-M) version 2.1: reliability and validity. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(1):61–67.
  • Sakakibara BM. Towards an Understanding of Self-Efficacy with Using a Manual Wheelchair [dissertation]. Vancouver: University of British Columbia; 2013.
  • IBM Corporation. IBM® SPSS® Statistics. Version 26.0. Armonk (NY): IBM; 2019.
  • Dancey C, Reidy J. Statistics without maths for psychology. 7th ed. UK: Pearson; 2017.
  • Tombaugh TN. Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19(2):203–214.
  • Kirby RL, Dupuis DJ, MacPhee AH, et al. The Wheelchair Skills Test (version 2.4): measurement properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):794–804.,
  • Mountain AD, Kirby RL, Smith C. The Wheelchair Skills Test, version 2.4: validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(3):416–423.
  • Newton AM, Kirby RL, MacPhee AH, et al. Evaluation of manual wheelchair skills: is objective testing necessary or would subjective estimates suffice? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(9):1295–1299.
  • Inkpen P, Parker K, Kirby RL. Manual wheelchair skills capacity versus performance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(6):1009–1013.
  • Kirby RL, Miller WC, Routhier F, et al. Effectiveness of a wheelchair skills training program for powered wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(11):2017–2026.e3.
  • Kirby RL, Swuste J, Dupuis DJ, et al. The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(1):10–18.
  • Duncanson H, Hollis AM, O'Connor MG. Errors versus speed on the trail making test: relevance to driving performance. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;113:125–130.
  • Papandonatos GD, Ott BR, Davis JD, et al. Clinical utility of the Trail-Making Test as a predictor of driving performance in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(11):2358–2364.
  • Rushton PW, Routhier F, Miller WC. Measurement properties of the WheelCon for powered wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(7):614–619.
  • Kirby RL, Worobey LA, Cowan R, et al. Wheelchair skills capacity and performance of manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(10):1761–1769.
  • Paulhus DL. Socially desirable responding: the evolution of a construct. In: Braun HI, Jackson DN, Wiley DE, editors. The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2002. p. 49–69.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.