References
- Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
- Pew Research Center. Voice assistants used by 46% of Americans, mostly on smartphones. Fact Tank; 2017. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/12/nearly-half-of-americans-use-digital-voice-assistants-mostly-on-their-smartphones/
- Cook A, Polgar JM, Encarnacao P. Cook and Hussey’s assistive technologies. 5th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2020.
- World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
- Curran K, Crawford I, O’Hara L. Catering for disabled surfers – a case study in web site navigation for disabled students. TAD. 2004;16(1):41–47.
- Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–146.
- Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, § 2, 104 Stat. 328 1990.
- Gardner TJ. Speech recognition for students with disabilities in writing. Phys Disabil Educ Relat Serv. 2008;26(2):43–53.
- Garrett JT, Heller KW, Fowler LP, et al. Using speech recognition software to increase writing fluency for individuals with physical disabilities. J Spec Educ Technol. 2011;26(1):25–41.
- Maor D, Currie J, Drewry R. The effectiveness of assistive technologies for children with special needs: a review of research-based studies. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2011;26(3):283–298.
- Shadiev R, Hwang W-Y, Chen N, et al. Review of speech-to-text recognition technology for enhancing learning. J Educ Technol Soc. 2014;17(4):65–84.
- Bain K, Lund-Lucas E, Stevens J. Transcribe your class: Using speech recognition to improve access for at-risk students. CELT. 2012;5(5):126.
- Millar DC, McNaughton DB, Light JC. A comparison of accuracy and rate of transcription by adults with learning disabilities using a continuous speech recognition system and a traditional computer keyboard. J Postsecondary Educ Disabil. 2005;18(1):12–22.
- Nelson LM, Reynolds TW Jr. Speech recognition, disability, and college composition. J Postsecondary Educ Disabil. 2015;28(2):181–197.
- Ryba K, McIvor T, Shakir M, et al. Liberated learning: analysis of university students’ perceptions and experiences with continuous automated speech recognition. E-J Instr Sci Technol. 2006;9(1):1–19.
- Judge S, Robertson Z, Hawley M, et al. Speech-driven environmental control systems-a qualitative analysis of users’ perceptions. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4(3):151–157.
- Alcantud F, Dolz I, Gaya C, et al. The voice recognition system as a way of accessing the computer for people with physical standards as usual. TAD. 2006;18(3):89–97.
- DeRosier R, Farber RS. Speech recognition software as an assistive device: a pilot study of user satisfaction and psychosocial impact. Work. 2005;25(2):125–134.
- Fager SK, Beukelman DR, Jakobs T, et al. Evaluation of a speech recognition prototype for speakers with moderate and severe dysarthria: a preliminary report. Augment Altern Commun. 2010;26(4):267–277.
- Hird K, Hennessey NW. Facilitating use of speech recognition software for people with disabilities: a comparison of three treatments. Clin Linguist Phon. 2007;21(3):211–226.
- Anttila H, Samuelsson K, Salminen A-L, et al. Quality of evidence of assistive technology interventions for people with disability: an overview of systematic reviews. TAD. 2012;24(1):9–48.
- Scherer MJ. Matching person & technology model and assessment process, revised. New York: Institute for Matching Person & Technology; 2007.
- Tang KW, Kamoua R, Sutan V, et al. Speech recognition technology for disabilities education. J Educ Technol Syst. 2005;33(2):173–184.
- Wigmore A, Hunter G, Pflugel E, et al. Using automatic speech recognition to dictate mathematical expressions: the development of the “TalkMaths” application at Kingston university. J Comput Math Sci Teach. 2009;28(2):177–189.
- Hussain MA, Ahsan K, Iqbal S, et al. Supporting deafblind in congregational prayer using speech recognition and vibro-tactile stimuli. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2019;123:70–96.
- Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J. Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61(3):164–179.