“There are endless areas that they can use it for”: speech-language pathologist perspectives of technology support for aphasia self-management

References

• Hallowell B. Aphasia and other acquired neurogenic language disorders: a guide for clinical excellence. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Berthier ML. Poststroke aphasia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs Aging. 2005;22(2):163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers HL, Silver FL, Fang J, et al. The incidence, co-occurrence, and predictors of dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia after first-ever acute ischemic stroke. J Commun Disord. 2013;46(3):238–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri D, Dubey S, Ardila A, et al. Factors affecting vascular aphasia severity. Aphasiology. 2021;35(5):633–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan L, Kaiser W. Aphasia—a social approach. New York, NY: Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, et al. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):196–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis C, Simpson AN, Bonilha H, et al. The one-year attributable cost of poststroke aphasia. Stroke. 2012;43(5):1429–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullier B, Cassoudesalle H, Villain M, et al. New factors that affect quality of life in patients with aphasia. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;63(1):33–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K. The impact of stroke: are people with aphasia different to those without? Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(3):211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalemans RJ, De Witte LP, Beurskens AJ, et al. An investigation into the social participation of stroke survivors with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(20):1678–1685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson B, Howe T, Worrall L, et al. Social participation for older people with aphasia: the impact of communication disability on friendships. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(4):325–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Simmons-Mackie N. Changing the Aphasia Narrative: Laying down the gauntlet: Our modest proposal for an elevator pitch describing the aphasia services SLPs deliver—and why SLPs are the ones to provide them; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Baker C, Worrall L, Rose M, et al. ‘It was really dark’: the experiences and preferences of people with aphasia to manage mood changes and depression. Aphasiology. 2020;34(1):19–46.
   Google Scholar
• Code C, Herrmann M. The relevance of emotional and psychosocial factors in aphasia to rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2003;13(1–2):109–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alary Gauvreau C, Le Dorze G, Croteau C, et al. Understanding practices of speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a grounded theory study. Aphasiology. 2019;33(7):846–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose M, Ferguson A, Power E, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: current practices, challenges and future directions. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(2):169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J, Huby G, Irving A-M, et al. Reconciling the perspective of practitioner and service user: findings from the aphasia in Scotland study. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010;45(5):551–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol L, Hill AJ, Wallace SJ, et al. Self-management of aphasia: a scoping review. Aphasiology. 2019;33(8):903–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Velde D, De Zutter F, Satink T, et al. Delineating the concept of self-management in chronic conditions: a concept analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e027775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner G, Packer T, Villeneuve M, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of stroke self-management programs for improving function and participation outcomes: self-management programs for stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(23):2141–2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer CE, Luker JA, McDonnell MN, et al. Self management programmes for quality of life in people with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(8). DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD010442.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Wray F, Clarke D, Forster A. Post-stroke self-management interventions: a systematic review of effectiveness and investigation of the inclusion of stroke survivors with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(11):1237–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol L, Wallace SJ, Pitt R, et al. People with aphasia share their views on self-management and the role of technology to support self-management of aphasia. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2021:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol L, Wallace SJ, Pitt R, et al. Communication partner perspectives of aphasia self-management and the role of technology: an in-depth qualitative exploration. Disabil Rehabil. 2021:1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morton K, Dennison L, May C, et al. Using digital interventions for self-management of chronic physical health conditions: a meta-ethnography review of published studies. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(4):616–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill AJ, Breslin HM. Refining an asynchronous telerehabilitation platform for speech-language pathology: engaging end-users in the process. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10(640):640.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wade J, Mortley J, Enderby P. Talk about IT: views of people with aphasia and their partners on receiving remotely monitored computer‐based word finding therapy. Aphasiology. 2003;17(11):1031–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidner K, Lowman J. Telepractice for adult speech-language pathology services: a systematic review. Perspect ASHA Sigs. 2020;5(1):326–338.
   Google Scholar
• Stark BC, Warburton EA. Improved language in chronic aphasia after self-delivered iPad speech therapy. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28(5):818–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braley M, De Oliveira E, Munsell M, et al. A phase II randomized, virtual, clinical trial of speech therapy app for speech, language, and cognitive intervention in stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(11):e62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmer R, Dimairo M, Cooper C, et al. Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(9):821–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Des Roches CA, Balachandran I, Ascenso EM, et al. Effectiveness of an impairment-based individualized rehabilitation program using an iPad-based software platform. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Lee JB, Kim K-YA, et al. Web-based oral reading for language in aphasia (web ORLA®): a pilot randomized control trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(7):976–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Sandt-Koenderman WME. Aphasia rehabilitation and the role of computer technology: can we keep up with modern times? Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13(1):21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran S, Des Roches C, Balachandran I, et al. Development of an impairment-based individualized treatment workflow using an iPad-based software platform. Semin Speech Lang. 2014;35(1):38–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland A, Weinberg P, Dittelman J. How to use apps clinically in the treatment of aphasia. Semin Speech Lang. 2012;33(3):223–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinyak-Fliszar M, Martin N, Keshner E, et al. Using virtual technology to promote functional communication in aphasia: preliminary evidence from interactive dialogues with human and virtual clinicians. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(4):S974–S989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Halper AS, Kaye RC. Computer-based script training for aphasia: emerging themes from post-treatment interviews. J Commun Disord. 2011;44(4):493–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburg C, Worrall L, Rodriguez AD, et al. Mobile computing technology and aphasia: an integrated review of accessibility and potential uses. Aphasiology. 2013;27(4):444–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng Y-L, Ma F, Ho FK, et al. Effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality-enhanced exercise on physical activity, psychological outcomes, and physical performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;99:278–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Marcos D, Bieler-Aeschlimann M, Serino A. Virtual reality as a vehicle to empower motor-cognitive neurorehabilitation [perspective]. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theng Y-L, Lee JWY, Patinadan PV, et al. The use of videogames, gamification, and virtual environments in the self-management of diabetes: a systematic review of evidence. Games Health J. 2015;4(5):352–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carragher M, Talbot R, Devane N, et al. Delivering storytelling intervention in the virtual world of EVA park. Aphasiology. 2018;32(sup1):37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Galliers J, Wilson S, Marshall J, et al. Experiencing EVA park, a multi-user virtual world for people with aphasia. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2017;10(4):1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Devane N, Edmonds L, et al. Delivering word retrieval therapies for people with aphasia in a virtual communication environment. Aphasiology. 2018;32(9):1054–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, et al., editors. From game design elements to gamefulness. Defining “gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• AlMarshedi A, Wills G, Ranchhod A. Gamifying self-management of chronic illnesses: a mixed-methods study. JMIR Serious Games. 2016;4(2):e14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kötteritzsch A, Gerling K. Future directions for ICT in aphasia therapy for older adults: enhancing current practices through interdisciplinary perspectives. Stem Spraak-en Taalpathol. 2015;20:135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming VAA. Rehabilitation in aphasia: using brain and behavioural measures to investigate the effects of a digital speech comprehension therapy [Doctoral dissertation]. London :UCL (University College London); 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wray F, Clarke D, Forster A. “Guiding them to take responsibility”: exploring UK speech and language therapists’ views of supporting self-management of aphasia. Aphasiology. 2020;34(4):411–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice; 2015. English.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne MM. Understanding life experiences through a phenomenological approach to research. AORN J. 2001;73(4):830–830.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton JV. Analysing qualitative interview data: addressing issues of validity and reliability. J Adv Nurs. 1995;22(5):993–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16(10):837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith B, McGannon KR. Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2018;11(1):101–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas DR. Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? Qual Res Psychol. 2017;14(1):23–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett A, Kajamaa A, Johnston J. How to … be reflexive when conducting qualitative research. Clin Teach. 2020;17(1):9–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Konings KD, Mann K, et al. A guide to reflexivity for qualitative researchers in education. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1257–1257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins English Dictionary (7th ed.). New Library World. 2006;107(1/2):81–83.
   Google Scholar
• Finch E, Hill AJ. Computer use by people with aphasia: a survey investigation. Brain Impairment. 2014;15(2):107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink RB, Brecher A, Schwartz MF, et al. A computer-implemented protocol for treatment of naming disorders: evaluation of clinician-guided and partially self-guided instruction. Aphasiology. 2002;16(10–11):1061–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Enderby P, Cooper C, et al. Computer therapy compared with usual care for people with long-standing aphasia poststroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2012;43(7):1904–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortley J, Wade J, Enderby P. Superhighway to promoting a client-therapist partnership? Using the internet to deliver word-retrieval computer therapy, monitored remotely with minimal speech and language therapy input. Aphasiology. 2004;18(3):193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsberger G, Marie B. Self-administered cued naming therapy: a single-participant investigation of a computer-based therapy program replicated in four cases; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kurland J, Wilkins A, Stokes P. iPractice: piloting the effectiveness of a tablet-based home practice program in aphasia treatment. Semin Speech Lang. 2014;35(1):51–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill AJ, Breslin HM. Asynchronous telepractice in aphasia rehabilitation: outcomes from a pilot study. Aphasiology. 2018;32(sup1):90–92.
   Google Scholar
• Szabo G, Dittelman J. Using mobile technology with individuals with aphasia: native iPad features and everyday apps. Semin Speech Lang. 2014;35(01):005–016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandenburg C, Worrall L, Copland D, et al. An exploratory investigation of the daily talk time of people with non-fluent aphasia and non-aphasic peers. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;19(4):418–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhr HR, Hoepner JK, Miller H, et al. AphasiaWeb: development and evaluation of an aphasia-friendly social networking application. Aphasiology. 2017;31(9):999–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz A, Wallace SE, Weissling K. Revisiting the role of augmentative and alternative communication in aphasia rehabilitation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020;29(2):909–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown K, Worrall L, Davidson B, et al. Exploring speech-language pathologists' perspectives about living successfully with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011;46(3):300–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown K, Worrall LE, Davidson B, et al. Living successfully with aphasia: a qualitative meta-analysis of the perspectives of individuals with aphasia, family members, and speech-language pathologists. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14(2):141–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grohn B, Worrall L, Simmons-Mackie N, et al. Living successfully with aphasia during the first year post-stroke: a longitudinal qualitative study. Aphasiology. 2014;28(12):1405–1425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, et al. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(6):957–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk M, Livingstone A, Pit SW. Telehealth in the context of COVID-19: changing perspectives in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e19264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appuswamy AV, Desimone ME. Managing diabetes in hard to reach populations: a review of telehealth interventions. Curr Diab Rep. 2020;20(7):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn A, Preston E, Dennis S, et al. Home-based exercise monitored with telehealth is feasible and acceptable compared to centre-based exercise in Parkinson’s disease: a randomised pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(5):728–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howland C, Wakefield B. Assessing telehealth interventions for physical activity and sedentary behavior self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an integrative review. Res Nurs Health. 2021;44(1):92–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Albright D. The effectiveness of telehealth on self-management for older adults with a chronic condition: a comprehensive narrative review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(6):392–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaglal SB, Haroun VA, Salbach NM, et al. Increasing access to chronic disease self-management programs in rural and remote communities using telehealth. Telemed e-Health. 2013;19(6):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekhtyar M, Braun EJ, Billot A, et al. Videoconference administration of the western aphasia battery-revised: feasibility and validity. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020;29(2):673–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill AJ, Theodoros DG, Russell TG, et al. The effects of aphasia severity on the ability to assess language disorders via telerehabilitation. Aphasiology. 2009;23(5):627–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi Y-H, Park HK, Paik N-J. A telerehabilitation approach for chronic aphasia following stroke. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(5):434–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macoir J, Sauvageau VM, Boissy P, et al. In-home synchronous telespeech therapy to improve functional communication in chronic poststroke aphasia: results from a quasi-experimental study. Telemed J E Health. 2017;23(8):630–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øra HP, Kirmess M, Brady MC, et al. Technical features, feasibility, and acceptability of augmented telerehabilitation in post-stroke aphasia-experiences from a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. 2020;11:671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt R, Theodoros D, Hill AJ, et al. The impact of the telerehabilitation group aphasia intervention and networking programme on communication, participation, and quality of life in people with aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;21(5):513–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparacino G. An examination of quality of life and communication confidence in aphasia through Telehealth Communication Groups; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tousignant M, Macoir J, Martel-Sauvageau V, et al. Satisfaction with in-Home speech telerehabilitation in Post-Stroke aphasia: an exploratory analysis. J Int Soc Telemed eHealth. 2018;6(1):e11 (1–8).
   Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Kaye RC, Hitch RS. The best of both worlds: combining synchronous and asynchronous telepractice in the treatment of aphasia. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord. 2011;21(3):83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Plener I, Hayward A, Saibil F. E-mail communication in the management of gastroenterology patients: a review. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;28(3):161–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson SA, Zocchi MS, Netherton D, et al. Secure messaging, diabetes self-management, and the importance of patient autonomy: a mixed methods study. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(10):2955–2962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorig K. Self-management education: more than a nice extra. Med Care. 2003;41(6):699–701.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood DA, Gee PM, Fatkin KJ, et al. A systematic review of reviews evaluating technology-enabled diabetes self-management education and support. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(5):1015–1027.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safari R, Jackson J, Sheffield D. Digital self-management interventions for people with osteoarthritis: systematic review with meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):e15365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermanns N, Ehrmann D, Finke‐Groene K, et al. Trends in diabetes self-management education: where are we coming from and where are we going? A narrative review. Diabet Med. 2020;37(3):436–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velez JA, Keene JR, Corwin M, et al. A visual interactive narrative intervention (VINI) for aphasia education: can digital applications administer augmented input to educate stroke survivors with aphasia? Pat Educ Counsel. 2021;104(10):2536–2543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber SM, Schütz N, Uslu AS, et al. Therapist-guided tablet-based telerehabilitation for patients with aphasia: proof-of-concept and usability study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;6(1):e13163 [
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moss B, Roper A, Talbot R, et al. Can hi-tech augmentative and alternative communication effectively support communication for people with aphasia? Aphasie. 2019;23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong J, Zuo M. How does family support work when older adults obtain information from mobile internet? ITP. 2019;32(6):1496–1516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman-Green D, Feder SL, Dionne-Odom JN, et al. Family caregiver support of patient self-management during chronic, life-limiting illness: a qualitative metasynthesis. J Fam Nurs. 2021;27(1):55–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai H-yS, Shillair R, Cotten SR. Social support and “playing around”: an examination of how older adults acquire digital literacy with tablet computers. J Appl Gerontol. 2017;36(1):29–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayberry LS, Kripalani S, Rothman RL, et al. Bridging the digital divide in diabetes: family support and implications for health literacy. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(10):1005–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer N, Keshavjee K, Demers C, et al. Online self-management interventions for chronically ill patients: cognitive impairment and technology issues. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(4):264–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt R, Hill AJ, Theodoros D, et al. “I definitely think it’s a feasible and worthwhile option”: perspectives of speech-language pathologists providing online aphasia group therapy. Aphasiology. 2018;32(9):1031–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menger F, Morris J, Salis C. Aphasia in an internet age: wider perspectives on digital inclusion. Aphasiology. 2016;30(2–3):112–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan J, Worrall L, Oxenham D. Accessible internet training package helps people with aphasia cross the digital divide. Aphasiology. 2004;18(3):265–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menger F, Morris J, Salis C. The impact of aphasia on internet and technology use. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(21):2986–2996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May J, Erickson S. Telehealth, why not. J Clin Pract Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(3):147–151.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister L, Dunkley C, Wilson L. Attitudes of speech pathologists towards ICTs for service delivery. Acquir Knowl Speech Lang Hear. 2008;10(3):84–88.
   Google Scholar
• Vaezipour A, Aldridge D, Koenig S, et al. “It’s really exciting to think where it could go”: a mixed-method investigation of clinician acceptance, barriers and enablers of virtual reality technology in communication rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2021:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayati B, Ayatollahi H. Speech therapists’ perspectives about using tele-speech therapy: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2021:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales MA, Hill AJ, Finch E. Feature rich, but user-friendly: speech pathologists' preferences for computer-based aphasia therapy. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;18(4):315–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali N. Changing trends from traditional to technology based approach. LLR. 2018;4(1):54–77.
   Google Scholar
• Chengyi L. Designing an assistive naming app for mandarin-speaking anomic aphasia patients; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Vaezipour A, Campbell J, Theodoros D, et al. Correction: mobile apps for speech-language therapy in adults with communication disorders: review of content and quality. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(12):e18858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly H, Kennedy F, Britton H, et al. Narrowing the “digital divide”—facilitating access to computer technology to enhance the lives of those with aphasia: a feasibility study. Aphasiology. 2016;30(2–3):133–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedon TA. Speech-language pathologists' practices and attitudes toward app use in therapy; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Chan AHS, Teh P-L. Insights into older adults’ technology acceptance through meta-analysis. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2021:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hülür G, Macdonald B. Rethinking social relationships in old age: digitalization and the social lives of older adults. Am Psychol. 2020;75(4):554–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar