Application of the extended technology acceptance model to explore clinician likelihood to use robotics in rehabilitation

References

• Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke. 2001;32(6):1279–1284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris JH, van Wijck F, Joice S, et al. Predicting health related quality of life 6 months after stroke: the role of anxiety and upper limb dysfunction. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(4):291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poltawski L, Allison R, Briscoe S, et al. Assessing the impact of upper limb disability following stroke: a qualitative enquiry using internet-based personal accounts of stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(10):945–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelsen SM, Dannenbaum R, Levin MF. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: randomized control trial. Stroke. 2006;37(1):186–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkenmeier RL, Prager EM, Lang CE. Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(7):620–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, et al. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(10):1692–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Gnip C. Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31(1):3–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayward KS, Brauer SG. Dose of arm activity training during acute and subacute rehabilitation post stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(12):1234–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandson RF, Kristy KA, Wu SJ, et al. Use of a robotic arm in the rehabilitation of stroke. Technical Paper – Society of Manufacturing Engineers MS. 1989: var paging MS89–296.
   Google Scholar
• Pignolo L. Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(12):955–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(6):22–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Platz T, et al. Electromechanical and robot‐assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(9). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub5.
   Google Scholar
• Lu EC, Wang RH, Hebert D, et al. The development of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot: identification of clinical practices and design requirements through a survey of therapists. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(5):420–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flynn N, Kuys S, Froude E, et al. Introducing robotic upper limb training into routine clinical practice for stroke survivors: perceptions of occupational therapists and physiotherapists. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66(4):530–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaic M, Kapp S, Hudson P, et al. Implementability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sci. 2008;39(2):273–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi B, Nadri H, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, et al. A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health Informatics. Appl Clin Inform. 2018;9(3):604–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health. 2011;26(9):1113–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEachan RRC, Conner M, Taylor NJ, et al. Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2011;5(2):97–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten-Peeters GG, Beekman-Evers MS, van Boxel AC, et al. Attitude, knowledge and behaviour towards evidence-based medicine of physical therapists, students, teachers and supervisors in The Netherlands: a survey. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(4):598–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diermayr G, Schachner H, Eidenberger M, et al. Evidence-based practice in physical therapy in Austria: current state and factors associated with EBP engagement. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(6):1219–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong J, Crocher V, Klaic M, et al. Promoting clinical best practice in a user-centred design study of an upper limb rehabilitation robot. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020; 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(1):159–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber LM, Stein J. The use of robots in stroke rehabilitation: a narrative review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;43(1):99–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar